An Anatomo-functional Implant Positioning Technique with Robotic Assistance for Primary TKA Allows the Restoration of the Native Knee Alignment and a Natural Functional Ligament Pattern, with a Faster Recovery at 6 months Compared to an Adjusted...

Overview

Journal Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

Publisher Wiley

Specialties Emergency Medicine
General Surgery
Orthopedics

Date 2022 May 13

PMID 35552475

Authors

Sebastien Parratte

Philippe Van Overschelde

Marc Bandi

Burak Yagmur Ozturk

Cecile Batailler

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: An anatomo-functional implant positioning (AFIP) technique in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) could restore physiological ligament balance (symmetric gap in extension, asymmetric gap in flexion). The purposes were to compare (1) ligament balancing in extension and flexion after TKA in the AFIP group, (2) TKA alignment, implant positioning and patellar tracking between AFIP and adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA) techniques, (3) clinical outcomes between both groups at 12 months.

Methods: All robotic-assisted TKA with an AFIP technique were included (n = 40). Exclusion criteria were genu valgum (HKA angle > 183°), extra-articular deformity more than 10°, and patellar maltracking (high-grade J-sign). One control patient with a TKA implanted by an aMA technique was matched for each case, based on age, body mass index, sex, and knee alignment. Ligament balancing (medial and lateral gaps in millimeters) in full extension and at 90° of flexion after TKA in the AFIP group was assessed with the robotic system. TKA alignment (HKA angle), implants positioning (femoral and tibial coronal axis, tibial slope, joint-line orientation), patellar tracking (patellar tilt and translation) and the Knee Society Score (KSS) at 6 and 12 months were compared between both groups. The ligament balancing was compared using a t test for paired samples in the AFIP group. The radiographic measurements and KSS scores were compared between groups using a t test for independent samples.

Results: In the AFIP group, there was no significant difference between the medial and lateral gap laxity in extension (NS). A significant opening of the lateral gap was observed in flexion compared to extension (mean: + 2.9 mm; p < 0.0001). The mean postoperative HKA angle was comparable between both groups (177.3° ± 2.1 in the AFIP group vs 176.8° ± 3.2; NS). In the AFIP group, the femoral anatomy was restored (90.9° ± 1.6) and the tibial varus was partially corrected (87.4° ± 1.8). The improvement of Knee and Function KSS at 6 months was better in the AFIP group (59.3 ± 11.9 and 51.7 ± 20, respectively, versus 49.3 ± 9.7 and 20.8 ± 13; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The AFIP concept allowed the restoration of the native knee alignment and a natural functional ligament pattern. With a more physiological target for ligament balancing, the AFIP technique had equivalent clinical outcomes at 12 months compared to aMA, with a faster recovery.

Level Of Evidence: III retrospective therapeutic case control series.

Citing Articles

Accuracy and clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty using an image-free navigation system.

Naito Y, Hasegawa M, Kobayashi G, Tone S, Sudo A Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025; 145(1):190.

PMID: 40085222 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-025-05819-7.

Orthopedic surgical robotic systems in knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive review.

Fan X, Wang Y, Zhang S, Xing Y, Li J, Ma X Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 13:1523631.

PMID: 40051834 PMC: 11882601. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1523631.

Current developments in robotic assistance technology for total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive overview.

Zhang H, Jiang X, Jin B, Zhang H, Liang J J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):80.

PMID: 39844280 PMC: 11752961. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05490-z.

Image-based robotic (ROSA knee system) total knee arthroplasty with inverse kinematic alignment compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty : Study protocol and the inverse kinematic alignment in 8-steps using the ROSA Knee system for knee....

Eijking H, Dorling I, Van Haaren E, Hendrickx R, Nijenhuis T, Schotanus M J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):47.

PMID: 39815282 PMC: 11734351. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05427-y.

Functional alignment is a feasible alignment strategy in robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis with extra-articular deformity - A case series.

Eu W, Ho J, Kunalan G SICOT J. 2025; 11():2.

PMID: 39803978 PMC: 11727079. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2024059.

References

Almaawi A, Hutt J, Masse V, Lavigne M, Vendittoli P . The Impact of Mechanical and Restricted Kinematic Alignment on Knee Anatomy in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32(7):2133-2140. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.028. View

Anglin C, Brimacombe J, Hodgson A, Masri B, Greidanus N, Tonetti J . Determinants of patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2008; 23(7):900-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.04.001. View

Argenson J, Parratte S, Ashour A, Komistek R, Scuderi G . Patient-reported outcome correlates with knee function after a single-design mobile-bearing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(11):2669-76. PMC: 2565059. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0418-x. View

Batailler C, Hannouche D, Benazzo F, Parratte S . Concepts and techniques of a new robotically assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: the ROSA knee system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021; 141(12):2049-2058. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04048-y. View

Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A . Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84(1):50-3. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b1.12432. View

Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J . The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 470(1):45-53. PMC: 3237976. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1936-5. View

Blakeney W, Clement J, Desmeules F, Hagemeister N, Riviere C, Vendittoli P . Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty better reproduces normal gait than mechanical alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 27(5):1410-1417. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5174-1. View

Brar A, Howell S, Hull M, Mahfouz M . Does Kinematic Alignment and Flexion of a Femoral Component Designed for Mechanical Alignment Reduce the Proximal and Lateral Reach of the Trochlea?. J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31(8):1808-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.040. View

de Boer J, Blankevoort L, Kingma I, Vorster W . In vitro study of inter-individual variation in posterior slope in the knee joint. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2009; 24(6):488-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.03.008. View

10.

Ferle M, Guo R, Hurschler C . The Laxity of the Native Knee: A Meta-Analysis of in Vitro Studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019; 101(12):1119-1131. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00754. View

11.

Franciozi C, Ambra L, Albertoni L, Debieux P, Granata Jr G, Kubota M . Anteromedial Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy Improves Results of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Instability in Patients With Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove Distance of 17 to 20 mm. Arthroscopy. 2019; 35(2):566-574. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.109. View

12.

Gharaibeh M, Monk E, Chen D, MacDessi S . Evaluation of the patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty: Validation of the weight bearing merchant radiographic view. Knee. 2018; 25(6):1262-1271. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.08.009. View

13.

Khow Y, Liow M, Goh G, Chen J, Lo N, Yeo S . Aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty outcomes were equivalent to patients' own pre-failure state but inferior to patients without revision. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 31(3):822-829. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06776-5. View

14.

Graichen H, Lekkreusuwan K, Eller K, Grau T, Hirschmann M, Scior W . A single type of varus knee does not exist: morphotyping and gap analysis in varus OA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 30(8):2600-2608. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06688-4. View

15.

Hill P, Vedi V, Williams A, Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman M . Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 82(8):1196-8. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b8.10716. View

16.

Hirschmann M, Moser L, Amsler F, Behrend H, Leclerq V, Hess S . Functional knee phenotypes: a novel classification for phenotyping the coronal lower limb alignment based on the native alignment in young non-osteoarthritic patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 27(5):1394-1402. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05509-z. View

17.

Howell S, Howell S, Kuznik K, Cohen J, Hull M . Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 471(3):1000-7. PMC: 3563808. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2613-z. View

18.

Howell S, Papadopoulos S, Kuznik K, Hull M . Accurate alignment and high function after kinematically aligned TKA performed with generic instruments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 21(10):2271-80. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2621-x. View

19.

Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman M . Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 82(8):1189-95. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b8.10717. View

20.

Kayani B, Konan S, Ayuob A, Onochie E, Al-Jabri T, Haddad F . Robotic technology in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev. 2019; 4(10):611-617. PMC: 6836078. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.190022. View