» Articles » PMID: 18709432

Patient-reported Outcome Correlates with Knee Function After a Single-design Mobile-bearing TKA

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2008 Aug 19
PMID 18709432
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: With substantial interest devoted to improving knee flexion after TKA, it is important to document the relationship between high range of motion and patient-rated outcomes shown. We therefore asked whether single-design high-flexion mobile-bearing posterior-stabilized TKA resulted in: (1) improved knee function; (2) satisfying subjective results; (3) participation recreational and sporting activities; and (4) function correlated to the final range of motion. We prospectively followed 445 consecutive patients having 516 TKAs from September 2000 to January 2005. The same high-flexion posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing implant was used in all patients. Mean patient age was 71 +/- 8 years and mean body mass index was 28 +/- 4 kg/m(2). The minimum clinical followup was 2 years (mean, 3 years; range, 2-4 years). The postoperative range of knee flexion was 128 degrees +/- 4 degrees and the mean Knee Society function and knee scores were 91 +/- 6 and 96 +/- 3, respectively. Eighty-two percent of patients were involved in sporting activities and 86% returned to their previous level of activity. These data confirm that high postoperative range of knee flexion improve patient-rated outcomes.

Level Of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Citing Articles

Shift to low-impact sports and recreational activities following total knee replacement.

Ventura A, Macchi V, Borgo E, Legnani C Int J Artif Organs. 2022; 45(11):952-956.

PMID: 35993237 PMC: 9580033. DOI: 10.1177/03913988221119524.


An anatomo-functional implant positioning technique with robotic assistance for primary TKA allows the restoration of the native knee alignment and a natural functional ligament pattern, with a faster recovery at 6 months compared to an adjusted....

Parratte S, Van Overschelde P, Bandi M, Yagmur Ozturk B, Batailler C Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 31(4):1334-1346.

PMID: 35552475 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-06995-4.


Functional and Cost Audit of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Public vs Private Hospitals: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Vaidya S, Desai K, Chavan A, Vaghasia D, Vaidya C Indian J Orthop. 2021; 55(5):1306-1316.

PMID: 34824730 PMC: 8586138. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00362-0.


Time for return to sport following total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Magan A, Baawa-Ameyaw J, Kayani B, Radhakrishnan G, Ronca F, Haddad F Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021; 142(11):3427-3436.

PMID: 34564735 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04180-9.


Comparing Return to Sports After Patellofemoral and Knee Arthroplasty in an Age- and Sex-Matched Cohort.

Schneider B, Ling D, Kleebad L, Strickland S, Pearle A Orthop J Sports Med. 2020; 8(10):2325967120957425.

PMID: 33088840 PMC: 7543186. DOI: 10.1177/2325967120957425.


References
1.
Petrie A . Statistics in orthopaedic papers. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88(9):1121-36. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B9.17896. View

2.
Victor J, Ries M, Bellemans J, Robb W, van Hellemondt G . High-flexion, motion-guided total knee arthroplasty: who benefits the most?. Orthopedics. 2007; 30(8 Suppl):77-9. View

3.
Witvrouw E, Victor J, Bellemans J, Rock B, Van Lummel R, Van Der Slikke R . A correlation study of objective functionality and WOMAC in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2002; 10(6):347-51. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-002-0302-2. View

4.
Dahm D, Barnes S, Harrington J, Berry D . Patient reported activity after revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(6 Suppl 2):106-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.030. View

5.
Jones R, Huo M . Rotating platform knees: an emerging clinical standard: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21(4 Suppl 1):33-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.021. View