» Articles » PMID: 26923495

Does Kinematic Alignment and Flexion of a Femoral Component Designed for Mechanical Alignment Reduce the Proximal and Lateral Reach of the Trochlea?

Overview
Journal J Arthroplasty
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2016 Mar 1
PMID 26923495
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty uses a femoral component designed for mechanical alignment (MA) and sets the component in more internal, valgus, and flexion rotation than MA. It is unknown how much kinematic alignment (KA) and flexion of the femoral component reduce the proximal and lateral reach of the trochlea; two reductions that could increase the risk of abnormal patella tracking.

Methods: We simulated MA and KA of the femoral component in 0° of flexion on 20 3-dimensional bone models of normal femurs. The mechanically and kinematically aligned components were then aligned in 5°, 10°, and 15° of flexion and downsized until the flange contacted the anterior femur. The reductions in the proximal and lateral reach from the proximal point of the trochlea of the MA component set in 0° of flexion were computed.

Results: KA at 0° of flexion did not reduce the proximal reach and reduced the lateral reach an average of 3 mm. Flexion of the MA and KA femoral component 5°, 10°, and 15° reduced the proximal reach an average of 4 mm, 8 mm, and 12 mm, respectively (0.8 mm/degree of flexion), and reduced the lateral reach an average of 1 mm and 4 mm regardless of the degree of flexion, respectively.

Conclusion: Arthroplasty surgeons and biomechanical engineers striving to optimize patella tracking might consider developing surgical techniques to minimize flexion of the femoral component when performing KA and MA total knee arthroplasty to promote early patella engagement and consider designing a femoral component with a trochlea shaped specifically for KA.

Citing Articles

Factors Affecting Successful Restricted Kinematic Alignment With Robotic Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Severe Varus Preoperative Alignment.

Fang S, Chiu K, Liu W, Cheung A, Chan P, Fu H Arthroplast Today. 2025; 30:101490.

PMID: 39959381 PMC: 11827013. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101490.


Does contemporary total knee designs replicate the anatomy of the native trochlea?.

Gattu N, Doherty D, He H, Rodriguez-Quintana D, Ismaily S, Lanfermeijer N Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 35(1):21.

PMID: 39579207 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-04159-3.


Excellent results of restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty at a minimum of 10 years of follow-up.

Morcos M, Beckers G, Salvi A, Bennani M, Masse V, Vendittoli P Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024; 33(2):654-665.

PMID: 39248213 PMC: 11792112. DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12452.


No Difference in 10-year Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment in TKA: A Randomized Trial.

Gibbons J, Zeng N, Bayan A, Walker M, Farrington B, Young S Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024; 483(1):140-149.

PMID: 39145997 PMC: 11658733. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003193.


Differences in Trochlear Morphology of a New Femoral Component Designed for Kinematic Alignment from a Mechanical Alignment Design.

Hull M, Simileysky A, Howell S Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(1).

PMID: 38247939 PMC: 10812931. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11010062.