» Articles » PMID: 35523699

4D Flow MRI Derived Aortic Hemodynamics Multi-year Follow-up in Repaired Coarctation with Bicuspid Aortic Valve

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 May 6
PMID 35523699
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between hemodynamic parameters and longitudinal changes in aortic dimensions on four-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and repaired coarctation.

Materials And Methods: The study retrospectively included patients with BAV and childhood coarctation repair who had at least two cardiothoracic MRI examinations including 4D flow MRI at baseline and follow-up. Analysis included the calculation of aortic peak velocities, wall shear stress (WSS), pulse wave velocity (PWV), aortic dimensions and annual growth rates. Differences between examinations were assessed using paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test. Relationships between growth rate and 4D flow metrics were assessed using Pearson or Spearman correlation tests.

Results: The cohort included 15 patients (mean age 35 ± 8 [SD] years, 9 men) with a median follow-up time of 3.98 years (Q1: 2.10; Q3: 4.96). There were no significant differences in aortic mean WSS, peak velocities, and PWV between baseline and follow-up values. Greater baseline peak velocities at the site of the coarctation were strongly associated with aortic narrowing (follow-up vs. baseline diameter) at coarctation zone (r = -0.64; P = 0.010) and moderately in descending aorta (r = -0.53; P = 0.042). In addition, increased baseline WSS in the aortic arch was strongly related with narrowing of the coarctation zone at follow-up (r = -0.64, P = 0.011).

Conclusion: Measures of aortic hemodynamics and aortic WSS are stable over time in patients with BAV with coarctation repair. Increased peak velocity was associated with a progressive narrowing at the site of the coarctation repair.

Citing Articles

Repaired coarctation of the aorta does not affect four-dimensional flow metrics in bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Kiljander T, Kauhanen P, Sillanmaki S, Lottonen-Raikaslehto L, Husso M, Yla-Herttuala E Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024; 38(5).

PMID: 38704861 PMC: 11101282. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivae086.


Clinical Use of Blood Flow Analysis through 4D-Flow Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease.

Mansoor O, Garcia J J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023; 10(6).

PMID: 37367416 PMC: 10299618. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10060251.


Location matters: Offset in tissue-engineered vascular graft implantation location affects wall shear stress in porcine models.

Contento J, Mass P, Cleveland V, Aslan S, Matsushita H, Hayashi H JTCVS Open. 2023; 12:355-363.

PMID: 36590712 PMC: 9801286. DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.08.006.

References
1.
Bedayat A, Jalili M, Hassani C, Chalian H, Reuhm S, Moriarty J . CT evaluation of unrepaired/incidental congenital cardiovascular diseases in adults. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2021; 102(4):213-224. DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.09.011. View

2.
Garcia J, Barker A, Markl M . The Role of Imaging of Flow Patterns by 4D Flow MRI in Aortic Stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 12(2):252-266. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.10.034. View

3.
Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke D, Bremerich J, Flamm S, Fogel M, Friedrich M . Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update : Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR): Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post-Processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020; 22(1):19. PMC: 7066763. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-020-00610-6. View

4.
Rahman O, Scott M, Bollache E, Suwa K, Collins J, Carr J . Interval changes in aortic peak velocity and wall shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 35(10):1925-1934. PMC: 6995350. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-019-01632-7. View

5.
Scott M, Huh H, van Ooij P, Chen V, Herrera B, Elbaz M . Impact of age, sex, and global function on normal aortic hemodynamics. Magn Reson Med. 2020; 84(4):2088-2102. PMC: 7751625. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28250. View