Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) in the Management of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk: An Update

Overview

Journal Adv Exp Med Biol

Specialties Biology
General Medicine

Date 2022 May 4

PMID 35508869

Authors

Didier Hans

Antoine Metrailler

Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez

Olivier Lamy

Enisa Shevroja

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) presents a low cost and readily available alternative to DXA measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) for osteoporotic fracture risk assessment. It is performed in a variety of skeletal sites, among which the most widely investigated and clinically used are first the calcaneus and then the radius. Nevertheless, there is still uncertainty in the incorporation of QUS in the clinical management of osteoporosis as the level of clinical validation differs substantially upon the QUS models available. In fact, results from a given QUS device can unlikely be extrapolated to another one, given the technological differences between QUS devices. The use of QUS in clinical routine to identify individuals at low or high risk of fracture could be considered primarily when central DXA is not easily available. In this later case, it is recommended that QUS bone parameters are used in combination with established clinical risk factors for fracture. Currently, stand-alone QUS is not recommended for treatment initiation decision making or follow-up. As WHO classification of osteoporosis thresholds cannot apply to QUS, thresholds specific for given QUS devices and parameters need to be determined and cross-validated widely to have a well-defined and certain use of QUS in osteoporosis clinical workflow. Despite the acknowledged current clinical limitations for QUS to be used more widely in daily routine, substantial progresses have been made and new results are promising.

Citing Articles

Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry-A Novel Tool in the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis and Prediction of Fragility Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Icatoiu E, Vladulescu-Trandafir A, Groseanu L, Berghea F, Cobilinschi C, Potcovaru C Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40075802 PMC: 11898608. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15050555.

Association Between Mandibular Cortical Erosion and Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Phalangeal Ultrasound and Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Spanish Women.

Canal-Macias M, Vera-Rodriguez V, Leal-Hernandez O, Calderon-Garcia J, Roncero-Martin R, Garcia-Blazquez F Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(4).

PMID: 40002658 PMC: 11854751. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15040507.

Relationships among Physical Activity Bone Mineral Density and Body Composition in Obese and Athletes.

Suttho D, Apibantaweesakul S, Soponputthaporn J, Hemapaibun S, Santipongphibool M, Tengcharoenkul C J Bone Metab. 2024; 31(4):326-334.

PMID: 39701111 PMC: 11658836. DOI: 10.11005/jbm.24.791.

Prevalence of osteoporosis and associated factors among people aged 50 years and older in the Madhesh province of Nepal: a community-based cross-sectional study.

Chaudhary N, Sunuwar D, Sapkota M, Pant S, Pradhan M, Bhandari K J Health Popul Nutr. 2024; 43(1):100.

PMID: 38965638 PMC: 11225282. DOI: 10.1186/s41043-024-00591-7.

Navigating Post-Traumatic Osteoporosis: A Comprehensive Review of Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future Directions.

Weiss M, Syed S, Whiteson H, Hirani R, Etienne M, Tiwari R Life (Basel). 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38792583 PMC: 11122478. DOI: 10.3390/life14050561.

References

Adami G, Arioli G, Bianchi G, Brandi M, Caffarelli C, Cianferotti L . Radiofrequency echographic multi spectrometry for the prediction of incident fragility fractures: A 5-year follow-up study. Bone. 2020; 134:115297. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115297. View

Alenfeld F, Wuster C, Funck C, Fritz T, Meeder P, Ziegler R . Ultrasound measurements at the proximal phalanges in healthy women and patients with hip fractures. Osteoporos Int. 1998; 8(5):393-8. DOI: 10.1007/s001980050081. View

Augat P, Fan B, Lane N, Lang T, LeHir P, Lu Y . Assessment of bone mineral at appendicular sites in females with fractures of the proximal femur. Bone. 1998; 22(4):395-402. DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(97)00302-5. View

Barkmann R, Kantorovich E, Singal C, Hans D, Genant H, Heller M . A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites: first results of precision and fracture discrimination. J Clin Densitom. 2000; 3(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1385/jcd:3:1:001. View

Bauer D, Gluer C, Genant H, Stone K . Quantitative ultrasound and vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. J Bone Miner Res. 1995; 10(3):353-8. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650100304. View

Bauer R . Ethnic differences in hip fracture: a reduced incidence in Mexican Americans. Am J Epidemiol. 1988; 127(1):145-9. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114774. View

Biver E, Pepe J, De Sire A, Chevalley T, Ferrari S . Associations between radius low-frequency axial ultrasound velocity and bone fragility in elderly men and women. Osteoporos Int. 2018; 30(2):411-421. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4725-0. View

Cepollaro C, Gonnelli S, Pondrelli C, Martini S, Montagnani A, Rossi S . The combined use of ultrasound and densitometry in the prediction of vertebral fracture. Br J Radiol. 1997; 70(835):691-6. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.70.835.9245880. View

Chan M, Nguyen N, Center J, Eisman J, Nguyen T . Absolute fracture-risk prediction by a combination of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density. Calcif Tissue Int. 2011; 90(2):128-36. DOI: 10.1007/s00223-011-9556-3. View

10.

Clowes J, Eastell R, Peel N . The discriminative ability of peripheral and axial bone measurements to identify proximal femoral, vertebral, distal forearm and proximal humeral fractures: a case control study. Osteoporos Int. 2005; 16(12):1794-802. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-1931-3. View

11.

Cortet B, Dennison E, Diez-Perez A, Locquet M, Muratore M, Nogues X . Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in a European multicenter clinical context. Bone. 2020; 143:115786. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115786. View

12.

Cummings S, Melton L . Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet. 2002; 359(9319):1761-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08657-9. View

13.

Damilakis J, Papadokostakis G, Perisinakis K, Maris T, Dimitriou P, Hadjipavlou A . Discrimination of hip fractures by quantitative ultrasound of the phalanges and the calcaneus and dual X-ray absorptiometry. Eur J Radiol. 2004; 50(3):268-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.01.023. View

14.

Damilakis J, Papadokostakis G, Vrahoriti H, Tsagaraki I, Perisinakis K, Hadjipavlou A . Ultrasound velocity through the cortex of phalanges, radius, and tibia in normal and osteoporotic postmenopausal women using a new multisite quantitative ultrasound device. Invest Radiol. 2003; 38(4):207-11. DOI: 10.1097/01.RLI.0000057031.21810.F4. View

15.

Dawson-Hughes B, Tosteson A, Melton 3rd L, Baim S, Favus M, Khosla S . Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA. Osteoporos Int. 2008; 19(4):449-58. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-008-0559-5. View

16.

Diez-Perez A, Brandi M, Al-Daghri N, Branco J, Bruyere O, Cavalli L . Radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry for the in-vivo assessment of bone strength: state of the art-outcomes of an expert consensus meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis.... Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019; 31(10):1375-1389. PMC: 6763416. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-019-01294-4. View

17.

Dimai H . Use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for diagnosis and fracture risk assessment; WHO-criteria, T- and Z-score, and reference databases. Bone. 2017; 104:39-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.12.016. View

18.

Donaldson M, McGrother C, Clayton D, Clarke M, Osborne D . Calcaneal ultrasound attenuation in an elderly population: measurement position and relationships with body size and past fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2000; 10(4):316-24. DOI: 10.1007/s001980050234. View

19.

Durosier C, Hans D, Krieg M, Schott A . Prediction and discrimination of osteoporotic hip fracture in postmenopausal women. J Clin Densitom. 2006; 9(4):475-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.06.002. View

20.

Ekman A, Michaelsson K, Petren-Mallmin M, Ljunghall S, Mallmin H . DXA of the hip and heel ultrasound but not densitometry of the fingers can discriminate female hip fracture patients from controls: a comparison between four different methods. Osteoporos Int. 2001; 12(3):185-91. DOI: 10.1007/s001980170128. View