» Articles » PMID: 35454038

Fast Segmentation of Metastatic Foci in H&E Whole-Slide Images for Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Apr 23
PMID 35454038
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Breast cancer is the leading cause of death for women globally. In clinical practice, pathologists visually scan over enormous amounts of gigapixel microscopic tissue slide images, which is a tedious and challenging task. In breast cancer diagnosis, micro-metastases and especially isolated tumor cells are extremely difficult to detect and are easily neglected because tiny metastatic foci might be missed in visual examinations by medical doctors. However, the literature poorly explores the detection of isolated tumor cells, which could be recognized as a viable marker to determine the prognosis for T1NoMo breast cancer patients. To address these issues, we present a deep learning-based framework for efficient and robust lymph node metastasis segmentation in routinely used histopathological hematoxylin−eosin-stained (H−E) whole-slide images (WSI) in minutes, and a quantitative evaluation is conducted using 188 WSIs, containing 94 pairs of H−E-stained WSIs and immunohistochemical CK(AE1/AE3)-stained WSIs, which are used to produce a reliable and objective reference standard. The quantitative results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves 89.6% precision, 83.8% recall, 84.4% F1-score, and 74.9% mIoU, and that it performs significantly better than eight deep learning approaches, including two recently published models (v3_DCNN and Xception-65), and three variants of Deeplabv3+ with three different backbones, namely, U-Net, SegNet, and FCN, in precision, recall, F1-score, and mIoU (p<0.001). Importantly, the proposed system is shown to be capable of identifying tiny metastatic foci in challenging cases, for which there are high probabilities of misdiagnosis in visual inspection, while the baseline approaches tend to fail in detecting tiny metastatic foci. For computational time comparison, the proposed method takes 2.4 min for processing a WSI utilizing four NVIDIA Geforce GTX 1080Ti GPU cards and 9.6 min using a single NVIDIA Geforce GTX 1080Ti GPU card, and is notably faster than the baseline methods (4-times faster than U-Net and SegNet, 5-times faster than FCN, 2-times faster than the 3 different variants of Deeplabv3+, 1.4-times faster than v3_DCNN, and 41-times faster than Xception-65).

Citing Articles

Out-of-distribution generalization for segmentation of lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.

Varnava Y, Jakate K, Garnett R, Androutsos D, Tyrrell P, Khademi A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1127.

PMID: 39775089 PMC: 11707152. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80495-y.


HI-Net: A novel histopathologic image segmentation model for metastatic breast cancer via lightweight dataset construction.

Li F, Ma J, Wen T, Tian Z, Liang H Heliyon. 2024; 10(19):e38410.

PMID: 39421372 PMC: 11483284. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38410.


Deep learning to assess microsatellite instability directly from histopathological whole slide images in endometrial cancer.

Wang C, Muzakky H, Firdi N, Liu T, Lai P, Wang Y NPJ Digit Med. 2024; 7(1):143.

PMID: 38811811 PMC: 11137095. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01131-7.


Artificial intelligence in digital pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

McGenity C, Clarke E, Jennings C, Matthews G, Cartlidge C, Freduah-Agyemang H NPJ Digit Med. 2024; 7(1):114.

PMID: 38704465 PMC: 11069583. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01106-8.


Computational methods for metastasis detection in lymph nodes and characterization of the metastasis-free lymph node microarchitecture: A systematic-narrative hybrid review.

Budginaite E, Magee D, Kloft M, Woodruff H, Grabsch H J Pathol Inform. 2024; 15:100367.

PMID: 38455864 PMC: 10918266. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100367.


References
1.
Naylor P, Lae M, Reyal F, Walter T . Segmentation of Nuclei in Histopathology Images by Deep Regression of the Distance Map. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019; 38(2):448-459. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2865709. View

2.
Anderson B, Cazap E, El Saghir N, Yip C, Khaled H, Otero I . Optimisation of breast cancer management in low-resource and middle-resource countries: executive summary of the Breast Health Global Initiative consensus, 2010. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12(4):387-98. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70031-6. View

3.
Yu K, Zhang C, Berry G, Altman R, Re C, Rubin D . Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:12474. PMC: 4990706. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12474. View

4.
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G . Deep learning. Nature. 2015; 521(7553):436-44. DOI: 10.1038/nature14539. View

5.
Bejnordi B, Veta M, van Diest P, van Ginneken B, Karssemeijer N, Litjens G . Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer. JAMA. 2017; 318(22):2199-2210. PMC: 5820737. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.14585. View