» Articles » PMID: 35416350

Association Between Biophysical Properties and Anxiety in Patients with Sensitive Skin

Overview
Date 2022 Apr 13
PMID 35416350
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sensitive skin (SS) is a syndrome in which neurosensory disorders accompany epidermal barrier dysfunction. However, it is not yet clear how high anxiety levels affect the biophysical parameters of the skin in patients with SS.

Objectives: We aimed to investigate the relationship between anxiety levels and facial neurosensitivity, the erythema index, sebum content, and sensitive skin scale scores in individuals with sensitive skin.

Methods: The study was carried out on 35 individuals with SS and 40 without SS over three months. In the study, a questionnaire to detect the presence of sensitive skin, the sensitive skin scale for sensitive skin severity, the lactic acid sting test (LAST) to show facial neurosensitivity, a Mexameter for erythema index measurement, and a Sebumeter for sebum content measurement were used. In addition, the anxiety levels of the patient and control groups were measured using the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS).

Results: While the HADS-Anxiety scores were found to be significantly higher in patients with sensitive skin, there was no significant difference in the HADS-Depression scores. Moreover, a strong positive correlation was found between the HADS-Anxiety scores and the erythema index in patients with sensitive skin.

Conclusions: Sensitive skin is a disorder that can sometimes occur without any dermatological examination findings. In particular, the sensations of the patients, along with their anxiety levels, are essential parameters that should be evaluated in the approach to patients with sensitive skin.

Citing Articles

Controlled comparison evaluation of the soothing effect of 3 cosmetic products on skin discomfort induced by an irritant chemical agent (capsaicin).

Vitale M, Lopez A, Truchuelo M, Nobile V, Milani M, Gomez-Sanchez M J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024; 23(12):4057-4065.

PMID: 39234948 PMC: 11626353. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.16526.


A review of factors influencing sensitive skin: an emphasis on built environment characteristics.

Chen X, Wen J, Wu W, Peng Q, Cui X, He L Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1269314.

PMID: 38111482 PMC: 10726041. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1269314.


The Challenges in Investigating the Pathogenesis of Sensitive Skin by Noninvasive Measurements: A Systematic Review.

Yan S, Zhao J, Han Y, Wang R, Bai K, Ge J Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023; 16:237-251.

PMID: 36726811 PMC: 9885880. DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S392925.


Association between biophysical properties and anxiety in patients with sensitive skin.

Manav V, Gore Karaali M, Erdem O, Aksu A Skin Res Technol. 2022; 28(4):556-563.

PMID: 35416350 PMC: 9907588. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13156.

References
1.
Manav V, Gore Karaali M, Erdem O, Aksu A . Association between biophysical properties and anxiety in patients with sensitive skin. Skin Res Technol. 2022; 28(4):556-563. PMC: 9907588. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13156. View

2.
Nojiri H, Ishida K, Yao X, Liu W, Imokawa G . Amelioration of lactic acid sensations in sensitive skin by stimulating the barrier function and improving the ceramide profile. Arch Dermatol Res. 2018; 310(6):495-504. DOI: 10.1007/s00403-018-1833-9. View

3.
Choi E, Brown B, Crumrine D, Chang S, Man M, Elias P . Mechanisms by which psychologic stress alters cutaneous permeability barrier homeostasis and stratum corneum integrity. J Invest Dermatol. 2005; 124(3):587-95. DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23589.x. View

4.
Maarouf M, Maarouf C, Yosipovitch G, Shi V . The impact of stress on epidermal barrier function: an evidence-based review. Br J Dermatol. 2019; 181(6):1129-1137. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.17605. View

5.
Ramirez M, Guerra-Juarez A, Miyake D, Sebastian-Arellano C, Estrada-Mata A, Gonzalez-Moyotl N . Correlation Between Corneal Nerve Density and Symptoms of Small Fiber Neuropathy in Patients With Fibromyalgia: The Confounding Role of Severe Anxiety or Depression. J Clin Rheumatol. 2020; 27(8):e606-e608. DOI: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001592. View