» Articles » PMID: 36726811

The Challenges in Investigating the Pathogenesis of Sensitive Skin by Noninvasive Measurements: A Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Dermatology
Date 2023 Feb 2
PMID 36726811
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sensitive skin (SS) is a common cutaneous condition that seriously affects people's quality of life, but studies of sensitive skin pathogenesis are unclear, the exploration are ongoing, and the biophysical properties of sensitive skin disagree with the study results. In this paper, we summarize the noninvasive biophysical and imaging instrumental methods used for sensitive skin and provide support for the classification of sensitive skin subtypes to prescribe precise treatment. PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched according to PRISMA guidelines for articles from January 1971 to May 2022 that used noninvasive biophysical or imaging methods to monitor adult subjects with sensitive skin. The quality of the included articles was determined based on 22 items of the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. A total of 55 studies were included, representing 8 biophysical and 5 imaging methods and their applications in treatment efficacy evaluation studies. The biophysical parameter and cutaneous morphological property changes in sensitive skin subjects were observed. The quality of the studies was relatively low, and there was high variability in results between studies. Several parameters have shown tremendous potential in exploring the pathogenesis with different sensitive skin subtypes: type I may be detected with higher transepidermal water loss and lower stratum corneum hydration values, as well as with thinner epidermis with a shallower and more irregular honeycomb structure; Type II and III are more prone to higher blood flow, lower current perception threshold than normal skin. This systematic review identifies key reasons for the lack of uniform trends in noninvasive measurements and recommends the use of effective selection instruments or relevant parameters to explore the pathogenesis of sensitive skin, and to differentiate the subtypes of sensitive skin for achieving the precise treatment.

Citing Articles

Unveiling the Metabolomic Profile of Oily Sensitive Skin: A Non-Invasive Approach.

Zhang J, Wu F, Wang J, Qin Y, Pan Y Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(20).

PMID: 39456816 PMC: 11507585. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252011033.


Dietary inflammatory index (DII) and sleep quality, duration, and timing: A systematic review.

Farrell E, Hebert J, Heflin K, Davis J, Turner-McGrievy G, Wirth M Sleep Med Rev. 2024; 77:101964.

PMID: 38833836 PMC: 11381171. DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2024.101964.

References
1.
Robinson M . Population differences in acute skin irritation responses. Race, sex, age, sensitive skin and repeat subject comparisons. Contact Dermatitis. 2002; 46(2):86-93. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.460205.x. View

2.
Qiao Z, Huang S, Leng F, Bei Y, Chen Y, Chen M . Analysis of the Bacterial Flora of Sensitive Facial Skin Among Women in Guangzhou. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021; 14:655-664. PMC: 8214519. DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S307668. View

3.
Zhang Y, Jin Y, Humbert P, Fan X, Cha Y, Guo Y . An herbal cream reduces erythema of sensitive skin. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020; 20(3):792-797. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.13610. View

4.
Sandby-Moller J, Poulsen T, Wulf H . Epidermal thickness at different body sites: relationship to age, gender, pigmentation, blood content, skin type and smoking habits. Acta Derm Venereol. 2003; 83(6):410-3. DOI: 10.1080/00015550310015419. View

5.
Robinson M, Perkins M . Evaluation of a quantitative clinical method for assessment of sensory skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis. 2001; 45(4):205-13. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.450403.x. View