» Articles » PMID: 35400312

Genetically Modified Foods: Bibliometric Analysis on Consumer Perception and Preference

Overview
Journal GM Crops Food
Date 2022 Apr 11
PMID 35400312
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this study, we present the bibliometric trends emerging from research outputs on consumer perception and preference for genetically modified (GM) foods and policy prescriptions for enabling the consumption using VOSviewer visualization software. Consumers' positive response is largely influenced by the decision of the governments to ban or approve the GM crops cultivation. Similarly, the public support increases when the potential benefits of the technology are well articulated, consumption increases with a price discount, people's trust on the government and belief in science increases with a positive influence by the media. Europe and the USA are the first region and country, respectively, in terms of the number of active institutions per research output, per-capita GDP publication and citations. We suggest research-, agri-food industries-, and society-oriented policies to be implemented by the stakeholders to ensure the safety of GM foods, encourage consumer-based studies, and increase public awareness toward these food products.

Citing Articles

Genetically modified crops and sustainable development: navigating challenges and opportunities.

Sandhu R, Chaudhary N, Shams R, Dash K Food Sci Biotechnol. 2025; 34(2):307-323.

PMID: 39944670 PMC: 11811348. DOI: 10.1007/s10068-024-01669-y.


Consumers' response to genetically modified food: an Italian case study.

DeMaria F, Romeo Lironcurti S, Morandi F, Pesce A, Gazza L, Nocente F GM Crops Food. 2024; 15(1):303-315.

PMID: 39504095 PMC: 11545258. DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2024.2417473.


Developing Food Consumer Attitudes towards Ionizing Radiation and Genetic Modification.

Junaedi I, McNeill L, Hamlin R Nutrients. 2024; 16(20).

PMID: 39458425 PMC: 11514585. DOI: 10.3390/nu16203427.


Impacts of knowledge and trust on consumer perceptions and purchase intentions towards genetically modified foods.

Ngo T, Phan T, Le T PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0311257.

PMID: 39356695 PMC: 11446447. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311257.


A review and outlook on expression of animal proteins in plants.

Tuse D, McNulty M, McDonald K, Buchman L Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1426239.

PMID: 39239203 PMC: 11374769. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1426239.


References
1.
Lassoued R, Phillips P, Macall D, Hesseln H, Smyth S . Expert opinions on the regulation of plant genome editing. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021; 19(6):1104-1109. PMC: 8196660. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13597. View

2.
Shukla M, Al-Busaidi K, Trivedi M, Tiwari R . Status of research, regulations and challenges for genetically modified crops in India. GM Crops Food. 2018; 9(4):173-188. PMC: 6343535. DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2018.1529518. View

3.
Chen K, Wang Y, Zhang R, Zhang H, Gao C . CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing and Precision Plant Breeding in Agriculture. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2019; 70:667-697. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100049. View

4.
Gao C . Genome engineering for crop improvement and future agriculture. Cell. 2021; 184(6):1621-1635. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.005. View

5.
Araus J, Serret M, Lopes M . Transgenic solutions to increase yield and stability in wheat: shining hope or flash in the pan?. J Exp Bot. 2019; 70(5):1419-1424. PMC: 6411371. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz077. View