» Articles » PMID: 36382611

Managers' Attitudes Toward Gene-editing Technology and Companies' R&D Investment in Gene-editing: the Case of Chinese Seed Companies

Overview
Journal GM Crops Food
Date 2022 Nov 16
PMID 36382611
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Chinese government has issued a series of new policies to make it easier to industrialize gene-edited crops. However, whether technological advantages will eventually translate into industrial advantages and whether farmers will soon have access to gene-edited varieties partly depends on seed companies' willingness to produce and sell gene-edited varieties to farmers and to invest in developing their own gene-edited varieties. This study utilizes data from a survey of 111 seed companies collected in 2019 before the implementation of new regulations. This study provides empirical evidence on whether gene-edited crops will be available to farmers. The results show that the number of companies conducting research on gene-edited crops is limited, mostly to large companies. Approximately 55% of seed company managers would consider developing and selling gene-edited crops modified by SDN-1 and SDN-2 site-directed nuclease genome editing without external genetic material, whereas 46% support crops modified by SDN-3, which require gene replacement or foreign deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) insertion and are regulated as genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The regression results show that large companies and companies with well-educated researchers are more likely to support and develop gene-editing technology. Past GM investment experience and collaboration with public institutions in gene-editing research increases the probability of company investment in gene editing R&D. These results suggest that gene-edited cultivars are more likely to be produced and sold to farmers in the future than GMOs, and that gene-edited agricultural products could have a significant market share of the seed market in the future.

References
1.
Apel A . The costly benefits of opposing agricultural biotechnology. N Biotechnol. 2010; 27(5):635-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2010.05.006. View

2.
Zhao Y, Deng H, Yu C, Hu R . The Chinese public's awareness and attitudes toward genetically modified foods with different labeling. NPJ Sci Food. 2019; 3:17. PMC: 6763464. DOI: 10.1038/s41538-019-0049-5. View

3.
Trapero C, Wilson I, Stiller W, Wilson L . Enhancing Integrated Pest Management in GM Cotton Systems Using Host Plant Resistance. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7:500. PMC: 4840675. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00500. View

4.
Marette S, Disdier A, Beghin J . A comparison of EU and US consumers' willingness to pay for gene-edited food: Evidence from apples. Appetite. 2020; 159:105064. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105064. View

5.
Watanabe D, Saito Y, Tsuda M, Ohsawa R . Increased awareness and decreased acceptance of genome-editing technology: The impact of the Chinese twin babies. PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0238128. PMC: 7500613. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238128. View