» Articles » PMID: 35395721

Machine Learning Models Outperform Deep Learning Models, Provide Interpretation and Facilitate Feature Selection for Soybean Trait Prediction

Overview
Journal BMC Plant Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Apr 9
PMID 35395721
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent growth in crop genomic and trait data have opened opportunities for the application of novel approaches to accelerate crop improvement. Machine learning and deep learning are at the forefront of prediction-based data analysis. However, few approaches for genotype to phenotype prediction compare machine learning with deep learning and further interpret the models that support the predictions. This study uses genome wide molecular markers and traits across 1110 soybean individuals to develop accurate prediction models. For 13/14 sets of predictions, XGBoost or random forest outperformed deep learning models in prediction performance. Top ranked SNPs by F-score were identified from XGBoost, and with further investigation found overlap with significantly associated loci identified from GWAS and previous literature. Feature importance rankings were used to reduce marker input by up to 90%, and subsequent models maintained or improved their prediction performance. These findings support interpretable machine learning as an approach for genomic based prediction of traits in soybean and other crops.

Citing Articles

Application of machine learning and genomics for orphan crop improvement.

MacNish T, Danilevicz M, Bayer P, Bestry M, Edwards D Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):982.

PMID: 39856113 PMC: 11760368. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56330-x.


Integration of machine learning and genome-wide association study to explore the genomic prediction accuracy of agronomic trait in oats (Avena sativa L.).

Peng J, Lei X, Liu T, Xiong Y, Wu J, Xiong Y Plant Genome. 2025; 18(1):e20549.

PMID: 39780036 PMC: 11711298. DOI: 10.1002/tpg2.20549.


Global Genotype by Environment Prediction Competition Reveals That Diverse Modeling Strategies Can Deliver Satisfactory Maize Yield Estimates.

Washburn J, Varela J, Xavier A, Chen Q, Ertl D, Gage J bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39345633 PMC: 11429743. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.13.612969.


Exploring genomic feature selection: A comparative analysis of GWAS and machine learning algorithms in a large-scale soybean dataset.

Al-Mamun H, Danilevicz M, Marsh J, Gondro C, Edwards D Plant Genome. 2024; 18(1):e20503.

PMID: 39253773 PMC: 11726426. DOI: 10.1002/tpg2.20503.


Technological Development and Advances for Constructing and Analyzing Plant Pangenomes.

Hu H, Li R, Zhao J, Batley J, Edwards D Genome Biol Evol. 2024; 16(4).

PMID: 38669452 PMC: 11058698. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evae081.


References
1.
Zou J, Huss M, Abid A, Mohammadi P, Torkamani A, Telenti A . A primer on deep learning in genomics. Nat Genet. 2018; 51(1):12-18. PMC: 11180539. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-018-0295-5. View

2.
Valliyodan B, Qiu D, Patil G, Zeng P, Huang J, Dai L . Landscape of genomic diversity and trait discovery in soybean. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:23598. PMC: 4814817. DOI: 10.1038/srep23598. View

3.
Marsh J, Hu H, Petereit J, Bayer P, Valliyodan B, Batley J . Haplotype mapping uncovers unexplored variation in wild and domesticated soybean at the major protein locus cqProt-003. Theor Appl Genet. 2022; 135(4):1443-1455. PMC: 9033719. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-022-04045-8. View

4.
McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A . The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010; 20(9):1297-303. PMC: 2928508. DOI: 10.1101/gr.107524.110. View

5.
Ubbens J, Parkin I, Eynck C, Stavness I, Sharpe A . Deep neural networks for genomic prediction do not estimate marker effects. Plant Genome. 2021; 14(3):e20147. DOI: 10.1002/tpg2.20147. View