» Articles » PMID: 35358172

Quantification of Long-term Doxorubicin Response Dynamics in Breast Cancer Cell Lines to Direct Treatment Schedules

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Mar 31
PMID 35358172
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While acquired chemoresistance is recognized as a key challenge to treating many types of cancer, the dynamics with which drug sensitivity changes after exposure are poorly characterized. Most chemotherapeutic regimens call for repeated dosing at regular intervals, and if drug sensitivity changes on a similar time scale then the treatment interval could be optimized to improve treatment performance. Theoretical work suggests that such optimal schedules exist, but experimental confirmation has been obstructed by the difficulty of deconvolving the simultaneous processes of death, adaptation, and regrowth taking place in cancer cell populations. Here we present a method of optimizing drug schedules in vitro through iterative application of experimentally calibrated models, and demonstrate its ability to characterize dynamic changes in sensitivity to the chemotherapeutic doxorubicin in three breast cancer cell lines subjected to treatment schedules varying in concentration, interval between pulse treatments, and number of sequential pulse treatments. Cell populations are monitored longitudinally through automated imaging for 600-800 hours, and this data is used to calibrate a family of cancer growth models, each consisting of a system of ordinary differential equations, derived from the bi-exponential model which characterizes resistant and sensitive subpopulations. We identify a model incorporating both a period of growth arrest in surviving cells and a delay in the death of chemosensitive cells which outperforms the original bi-exponential growth model in Akaike Information Criterion based model selection, and use the calibrated model to quantify the performance of each drug schedule. We find that the inter-treatment interval is a key variable in determining the performance of sequential dosing schedules and identify an optimal retreatment time for each cell line which extends regrowth time by 40%-239%, demonstrating that the time scale of changes in chemosensitivity following doxorubicin exposure allows optimization of drug scheduling by varying this inter-treatment interval.

Citing Articles

A global sensitivity analysis of a mechanistic model of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple negative breast cancer constrained by in vitro and in vivo imaging data.

Lorenzo G, Jarrett A, Meyer C, DiCarlo J, Virostko J, Quaranta V Eng Comput. 2024; 40(3):1469-1499.

PMID: 39620056 PMC: 11607094. DOI: 10.1007/s00366-023-01873-0.


Computational identification of surface markers for isolating distinct subpopulations from heterogeneous cancer cell populations.

Gardner A, Jost T, Morgan D, Brock A NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2024; 10(1):120.

PMID: 39420005 PMC: 11487074. DOI: 10.1038/s41540-024-00441-6.


Cell-state transitions and density-dependent interactions together explain the dynamics of spontaneous epithelial-mesenchymal heterogeneity.

Jain P, Kizhuttil R, Nair M, Bhatia S, Thompson E, George J iScience. 2024; 27(7):110310.

PMID: 39055927 PMC: 11269952. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110310.


Cancer cell sedimentation in 3D cultures reveals active migration regulated by self-generated gradients and adhesion sites.

Dimitriou N, Flores-Torres S, Kyriakidou M, Kinsella J, Mitsis G PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(6):e1012112.

PMID: 38861575 PMC: 11195982. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012112.


Computational identification of surface markers for isolating distinct subpopulations from heterogeneous cancer cell populations.

Gardner A, Jost T, Brock A bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38854060 PMC: 11160629. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.28.596337.


References
1.
Bonadonna G, Zambetti M, Valagussa P . Sequential or alternating doxorubicin and CMF regimens in breast cancer with more than three positive nodes. Ten-year results. JAMA. 1995; 273(7):542-7. View

2.
Abramson V, Mayer I . Molecular Heterogeneity of Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2014; 6(3):154-158. PMC: 4235783. DOI: 10.1007/s12609-014-0152-1. View

3.
Howard G, Johnson K, Rodriguez Ayala A, Yankeelov T, Brock A . A multi-state model of chemoresistance to characterize phenotypic dynamics in breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):12058. PMC: 6089904. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30467-w. View

4.
Gottlieb J, Rivkin S, Spigel S, Hoogstraten B, OBRYAN R, Delaney F . Proceedings: Superiority of adriamycin over oral nitrosoureas in patients with advanced breast carcinoma. A Southwest Cancer Chemotherapy study Group study. Cancer. 1974; 33(2):519-26. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197402)33:2<519::aid-cncr2820330229>3.0.co;2-x. View

5.
Hanahan D, Bergers G, Bergsland E . Less is more, regularly: metronomic dosing of cytotoxic drugs can target tumor angiogenesis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2000; 105(8):1045-7. PMC: 300842. DOI: 10.1172/JCI9872. View