» Articles » PMID: 25965164

Non-genetic Cancer Cell Plasticity and Therapy-induced Stemness in Tumour Relapse: 'What Does Not Kill Me Strengthens Me'

Overview
Journal Br J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2015 May 13
PMID 25965164
Citations 159
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Therapy resistance and tumour relapse after drug therapy are commonly explained by Darwinian selection of pre-existing drug-resistant, often stem-like cancer cells resulting from random mutations. However, the ubiquitous non-genetic heterogeneity and plasticity of tumour cell phenotype raises the question: are mutations really necessary and sufficient to promote cell phenotype changes during tumour progression? Cancer therapy inevitably spares some cancer cells, even in the absence of resistant mutants. Accumulating observations suggest that the non-killed, residual tumour cells actively acquire a new phenotype simply by exploiting their developmental potential. These surviving cells are stressed by the cytotoxic treatment, and owing to phenotype plasticity, exhibit a variety of responses. Some are pushed into nearby, latent attractor states of the gene regulatory network which resemble evolutionary ancient or early developmental gene expression programs that confer stemness and resilience. By entering such stem-like, stress-response states, the surviving cells strengthen their capacity to cope with future noxious agents. Considering non-genetic cell state dynamics and the relative ease with which surviving but stressed cells can be tipped into latent attractors provides a foundation for exploring new therapeutic approaches that seek not only to kill cancer cells but also to avoid promoting resistance and relapse that are inherently linked to the attempts to kill them.

Citing Articles

Molecular mechanisms altering cell identity in cancer.

Zippo A, Beyes S Oncogene. 2025; .

PMID: 40011573 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-025-03314-2.


Radiation-induced cellular plasticity primes glioblastoma for forskolin-mediated differentiation.

He L, Azizad D, Bhat K, Ioannidis A, Hoffmann C, Arambula E Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(9):e2415557122.

PMID: 40009641 PMC: 11892679. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2415557122.


Tumor-associated macrophages drive heterogenetic CD10 cancer stem cells to implement tumor-associated neutrophils reprogramming in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

You Y, Du Z, Tian Z, Li S, Yu F, Xiao M Int J Biol Sci. 2025; 21(3):1110-1126.

PMID: 39897030 PMC: 11781160. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.100611.


Classification of Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer Using Radiomic Features of Preoperative Ultrasound Images.

Zhang H, Wang L, Lin Y, Ha X, Huang C, Han C J Imaging Inform Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39843718 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-025-01388-8.


[F]FDG PET/CT volumetric biomarkers for non-invasive prediction of HER2 expression in breast cancer patients.

Elahmadawy M, Abdelhamed H, Gamal El-Din D, Eltohamy M, Ismail Hassan A, Abd El-Gaid S Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol. 2025; 13(1):10-20.

PMID: 39744060 PMC: 11682474. DOI: 10.22038/aojnmb.2024.79970.1563.


References
1.
Gupta P, Chaffer C, Weinberg R . Cancer stem cells: mirage or reality?. Nat Med. 2009; 15(9):1010-2. DOI: 10.1038/nm0909-1010. View

2.
Huang S . Genetic and non-genetic instability in tumor progression: link between the fitness landscape and the epigenetic landscape of cancer cells. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2013; 32(3-4):423-48. DOI: 10.1007/s10555-013-9435-7. View

3.
Raj A, van Oudenaarden A . Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences. Cell. 2008; 135(2):216-26. PMC: 3118044. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.050. View

4.
Zhou J, Pisco A, Qian H, Huang S . Nonequilibrium population dynamics of phenotype conversion of cancer cells. PLoS One. 2014; 9(12):e110714. PMC: 4249833. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110714. View

5.
Zhou J, Aliyu M, Aurell E, Huang S . Quasi-potential landscape in complex multi-stable systems. J R Soc Interface. 2012; 9(77):3539-53. PMC: 3481575. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0434. View