» Articles » PMID: 35343269

Long-term Continuous Glucose Monitor Use in Very Young Children With Type 1 Diabetes: One-Year Results From the SENCE Study

Abstract

Objectives: Achieving optimal glycemic outcomes in young children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) is challenging. This study examined the durability of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) coupled with a family behavioral intervention (FBI) to improve glycemia.

Study Design: This one-year study included an initial 26-week randomized controlled trial of CGM with FBI () and CGM alone () compared with blood glucose monitoring (BGM), followed by a 26-week extension phase wherein the BGM Group received the CGM+FBI () and both original CGM groups continued this technology.

Results: Time in range (70-180 mg/dL) did not improve with CGM use (CGM+FBI: baseline 37%, 52 weeks 41%; Standard-CGM: baseline 41%, 52 weeks 44%; BGM-Crossover: 26 weeks 38%, 52 weeks 40%). All three groups sustained decreases in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) with CGM use (CGM+FBI: baseline 3.4%, 52 weeks 2.0%; Standard-CGM: baseline 4.1%, 52 weeks 2.1%; BGM-Crossover: 26 weeks 4.5%, 52 weeks 1.7%, -values <.001). Hemoglobin A1c was unchanged with CGM use (CGM+FBI: baseline 8.3%, 52 weeks 8.2%; Standard-CGM: baseline 8.2%, 52 weeks 8.0%; BGM-Crossover: 26 weeks 8.1%, 52 weeks 8.3%). Sensor use remained high (52-week study visit: CGM+FBI 91%, Standard-CGM 92%, BGM-Crossover 88%).

Conclusion: Over 12 months young children with T1D using newer CGM technology sustained reductions in hypoglycemia and, in contrast to prior studies, persistently wore CGM. However, pervasive hyperglycemia remained unmitigated. This indicates an urgent need for further advances in diabetes technology, behavioral support, and diabetes management educational approaches to optimize glycemia in young children.

Citing Articles

International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2024 Diabetes Technologies: Glucose Monitoring.

Tauschman M, Cardona-Hernandez R, DeSalvo D, Hood K, Laptev D, Lindholm Olinder A Horm Res Paediatr. 2025; 97(6):615-635.

PMID: 39884260 PMC: 11854985. DOI: 10.1159/000543156.


7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

Diabetes Care. 2024; 48(Supplement_1):S146-S166.

PMID: 39651978 PMC: 11635043. DOI: 10.2337/dc25-S007.


Using Time in Tight Glucose Range as a Health-Promoting Strategy in Preschoolers With Type 1 Diabetes.

Sundberg F, Smart C, Samuelsson J, Akesson K, Krogvold L Diabetes Care. 2024; 48(1):6-14.

PMID: 39546551 PMC: 11664192. DOI: 10.2337/dci24-0058.


Gaming the System: A Fun Continuous Glucose Monitor Interface Improves Glycemic Outcomes for Children.

Ahmadi F, Lucero A J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024; :19322968231223759.

PMID: 38213125 PMC: 11572176. DOI: 10.1177/19322968231223759.


7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.

Diabetes Care. 2023; 47(Suppl 1):S126-S144.

PMID: 38078575 PMC: 10725813. DOI: 10.2337/dc24-S007.


References
1.
Sundberg F, Forsander G . Detection and treatment efficacy of hypoglycemic events in the everyday life of children younger than 7 yr. Pediatr Diabetes. 2013; 15(1):34-40. DOI: 10.1111/pedi.12057. View

2.
. 13. Children and Adolescents: . Diabetes Care. 2019; 43(Suppl 1):S163-S182. DOI: 10.2337/dc20-S013. View

3.
Van Name M, Hilliard M, Boyle C, Miller K, DeSalvo D, Anderson B . Nighttime is the worst time: Parental fear of hypoglycemia in young children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2017; 19(1):114-120. PMC: 5650950. DOI: 10.1111/pedi.12525. View

4.
Ware J, Allen J, Boughton C, Wilinska M, Hartnell S, Thankamony A . Randomized Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Very Young Children with Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2022; 386(3):209-219. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111673. View

5.
Laffel L, Kanapka L, Beck R, Bergamo K, Clements M, Criego A . Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020; 323(23):2388-2396. PMC: 7298603. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.6940. View