» Articles » PMID: 29162583

International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Abstract

Measurement of glycated hemoglobin (HbA) has been the traditional method for assessing glycemic control. However, it does not reflect intra- and interday glycemic excursions that may lead to acute events (such as hypoglycemia) or postprandial hyperglycemia, which have been linked to both microvascular and macrovascular complications. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), either from real-time use (rtCGM) or intermittently viewed (iCGM), addresses many of the limitations inherent in HbA testing and self-monitoring of blood glucose. Although both provide the means to move beyond the HbA measurement as the sole marker of glycemic control, standardized metrics for analyzing CGM data are lacking. Moreover, clear criteria for matching people with diabetes to the most appropriate glucose monitoring methodologies, as well as standardized advice about how best to use the new information they provide, have yet to be established. In February 2017, the Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes (ATTD) Congress convened an international panel of physicians, researchers, and individuals with diabetes who are expert in CGM technologies to address these issues. This article summarizes the ATTD consensus recommendations and represents the current understanding of how CGM results can affect outcomes.

Citing Articles

Classifying Continuous Glucose Monitoring Documents From Electronic Health Records.

Zheng Y, Iturrate E, Li L, Wu B, Small W, Zweig S J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025; :19322968251324535.

PMID: 40071848 PMC: 11904921. DOI: 10.1177/19322968251324535.


Challenges, current innovations, and opportunities for managing type 2 diabetes in frail older adults: a position paper of the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EuGMS)-Special Interest Group in Diabetes.

Boccardi V, Bahat G, Balci C, Bourdel-Marchasson I, Christiaens A, Donini L Eur Geriatr Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40014274 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-025-01168-1.


Toward Detection of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia in People With Diabetes Using Consumer-Grade Smartwatches and a Machine Learning Approach.

Mendez C, Kaykayoglu C, Bahler T, Kunzler J, Lizoain A, Rothenbuhler M J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025; :19322968251319800.

PMID: 39996274 PMC: 11851596. DOI: 10.1177/19322968251319800.


Availability of Open Dynamic Glycemic Data in the Field of Diabetes Research: A Scoping Review.

Del Giudice L, Piersanti A, Gobl C, Burattini L, Tura A, Morettini M J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025; :19322968251316896.

PMID: 39953711 PMC: 11830157. DOI: 10.1177/19322968251316896.


Association between the GMI/HbA1c ratio and preclinical carotid atherosclerosis in type 1 diabetes: impact of the fast-glycator phenotype across age groups.

Puig-Jove C, Vinals C, Conget I, Quiros C, Vinagre I, Berrocal B Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025; 24(1):75.

PMID: 39953520 PMC: 11829493. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-025-02637-4.


References
1.
New J, Ajjan R, Pfeiffer A, Freckmann G . Continuous glucose monitoring in people with diabetes: the randomized controlled Glucose Level Awareness in Diabetes Study (GLADIS). Diabet Med. 2015; 32(5):609-17. DOI: 10.1111/dme.12713. View

2.
Campbell M, Schatz D, Chen V, Wong J, Steck A, Tamborlane W . A contrast between children and adolescents with excellent and poor control: the T1D Exchange clinic registry experience. Pediatr Diabetes. 2013; 15(2):110-7. PMC: 4164957. DOI: 10.1111/pedi.12067. View

3.
Cryer P . The barrier of hypoglycemia in diabetes. Diabetes. 2008; 57(12):3169-76. PMC: 2584119. DOI: 10.2337/db08-1084. View

4.
Esposito K, Giugliano D, Nappo F, Marfella R . Regression of carotid atherosclerosis by control of postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2004; 110(2):214-9. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000134501.57864.66. View

5.
Shipman K, Jawad M, Sullivan K, Ford C, Gama R . Ethnic/racial determinants of glycemic markers in a UK sample. Acta Diabetol. 2015; 52(4):687-92. DOI: 10.1007/s00592-014-0703-y. View