» Articles » PMID: 35327938

Machine Learning Models and Statistical Complexity to Analyze the Effects of Posture on Cerebral Hemodynamics

Overview
Journal Entropy (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Mar 25
PMID 35327938
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The mechanism of cerebral blood flow autoregulation can be of great importance in diagnosing and controlling a diversity of cerebrovascular pathologies such as vascular dementia, brain injury, and neurodegenerative diseases. To assess it, there are several methods that use changing postures, such as sit-stand or squat-stand maneuvers. However, the evaluation of the dynamic cerebral blood flow autoregulation (dCA) in these postures has not been adequately studied using more complex models, such as non-linear ones. Moreover, dCA can be considered part of a more complex mechanism called cerebral hemodynamics, where others (CO reactivity and neurovascular-coupling) that affect cerebral blood flow (BF) are included. In this work, we analyzed postural influences using non-linear machine learning models of dCA and studied characteristics of cerebral hemodynamics under statistical complexity using eighteen young adult subjects, aged 27 ± 6.29 years, who took the systemic or arterial blood pressure (BP) and cerebral blood flow velocity (BFV) for five minutes in three different postures: stand, sit, and lay. With models of a Support Vector Machine (SVM) through time, we used an AutoRegulatory Index (ARI) to compare the dCA in different postures. Using wavelet entropy, we estimated the statistical complexity of BFV for three postures. Repeated measures ANOVA showed that only the complexity of lay-sit had significant differences.

Citing Articles

Time-domain methods for quantifying dynamic cerebral blood flow autoregulation: Review and recommendations. A white paper from the Cerebrovascular Research Network (CARNet).

Kostoglou K, Bello-Robles F, Brassard P, Chacon M, Claassen J, Czosnyka M J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2024; 44(9):1480-1514.

PMID: 38688529 PMC: 11418733. DOI: 10.1177/0271678X241249276.


Time-Series Modeling and Forecasting of Cerebral Pressure-Flow Physiology: A Scoping Systematic Review of the Human and Animal Literature.

Vakitbilir N, Froese L, Gomez A, Sainbhi A, Stein K, Islam A Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(5).

PMID: 38474990 PMC: 10934638. DOI: 10.3390/s24051453.


Evaluating the Effectiveness of Complexity Features of Eye Movement on Computer Activities Detection.

Destyanto T, Lin R Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(6).

PMID: 35742067 PMC: 9222268. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10061016.

References
1.
Cavieres R, Landerretche J, Jara J, Chacon M . Analysis of cerebral blood flow entropy while listening to music with emotional content. Physiol Meas. 2021; 42(5). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/abf885. View

2.
Mitsis G, Zhang R, Levine B, Marmarelis V . Modeling of nonlinear physiological systems with fast and slow dynamics. II. Application to cerebral autoregulation. Ann Biomed Eng. 2002; 30(4):555-65. DOI: 10.1114/1.1477448. View

3.
Claassen J, Levine B, Zhang R . Dynamic cerebral autoregulation during repeated squat-stand maneuvers. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008; 106(1):153-60. PMC: 2636935. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90822.2008. View

4.
Mahdi A, Nikolic D, Birch A, Olufsen M, Panerai R, Simpson D . Increased blood pressure variability upon standing up improves reproducibility of cerebral autoregulation indices. Med Eng Phys. 2017; 47:151-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.06.006. View

5.
Tiecks F, Lam A, Aaslid R, Newell D . Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation measurements. Stroke. 1995; 26(6):1014-9. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.26.6.1014. View