» Articles » PMID: 7762016

Comparison of Static and Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation Measurements

Overview
Journal Stroke
Date 1995 Jun 1
PMID 7762016
Citations 248
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Cerebral autoregulation can be evaluated by measuring relative blood flow changes in response to a steady-state change in the blood pressure (static method) or during the response to a rapid change in blood pressure (dynamic method). The purpose of this study was to compare the results of the two methods in humans with both intact and impaired autoregulatory capacity.

Methods: Using intraoperative transcranial Doppler sonography recordings from both middle cerebral arteries, we determined static and dynamic autoregulatory responses in 10 normal subjects undergoing elective surgical procedures. The changes in cerebrovascular resistance were estimated from the changes in cerebral blood flow velocity and arterial blood pressure in response to manipulations of blood pressure. Static autoregulation was determined by analyzing the response to a phenylephrine-induced rise in blood pressure, whereas rapid deflation of a blood pressure cuff around one thigh served as a stimulus for testing dynamic autoregulation. Both measurements were performed in patients with intact autoregulation during propofol anesthesia and again in the same patients after autoregulation had been impaired by administration of high-dose isoflurane.

Results: There was a significant reduction in autoregulatory capacity after the administration of high-dose isoflurane, which could be demonstrated using static (P < .0001) and dynamic (P < .0001) methods. The correlation between static or steady-state and dynamic autoregulation measurements was highly significant (r = .93, P < .0001).

Conclusions: These data show that in normal human subjects measurement of dynamic autoregulation yields similar results as static testing of intact and pharmacologically impaired autoregulation.

Citing Articles

The U.S. POINTER neurovascular ancillary study: Study design and methods.

Brinkley T, Garcia K, Mitchell G, Tegeler C, Sarwal A, Bennett J Alzheimers Dement. 2025; 21(2):e14574.

PMID: 39992278 PMC: 11849405. DOI: 10.1002/alz.14574.


Individualized autoregulation-guided arterial blood pressure management in neurocritical care.

Gomez J, Bhende B, Mathur R, Gonzalez L, Shah V Neurotherapeutics. 2025; 22(1):e00526.

PMID: 39828496 PMC: 11840358. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00526.


Autoregulatory dysfunction in adult Moyamoya disease with cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after bypass surgery.

Kim J, Hong N, Kim H, Choi Y, Lee H, Ha E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26451.

PMID: 39488581 PMC: 11531593. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-76559-8.


Impact of different blood pressure targets on cerebral hemodynamics in septic shock: A prospective pilot study protocol-SEPSIS-BRAIN.

Cury P, da Hora Passos R, Alves F, Brasil S, Frigieri G, Taccone F PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0304412.

PMID: 39401208 PMC: 11472940. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304412.


Examining the upper frequency limit of dynamic cerebral autoregulation: Considerations across the cardiac cycle during eucapnia.

Burma J, Neill M, Fletcher E, Dennett B, Johnson N, Javra R Exp Physiol. 2024; 109(12):2100-2121.

PMID: 39382938 PMC: 11607623. DOI: 10.1113/EP091719.