» Articles » PMID: 35324989

Directionality of the Injected Current Targeting the P20/N20 Source Determines the Efficacy of 140 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)-induced Aftereffects in the Somatosensory Cortex

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Mar 24
PMID 35324989
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Interindividual anatomical differences in the human cortex can lead to suboptimal current directions and may result in response variability of transcranial electrical stimulation methods. These differences in brain anatomy require individualized electrode stimulation montages to induce an optimal current density in the targeted area of each individual subject. We aimed to explore the possible modulatory effects of 140 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on the somatosensory cortex using personalized multi-electrode stimulation montages. In two randomized experiments using either tactile finger or median nerve stimulation, we measured by evoked potentials the plasticity aftereffects and oscillatory power changes after 140 Hz tACS at 1.0 mA as compared to sham stimulation (n = 17, male = 9). We found a decrease in the power of oscillatory mu-rhythms during and immediately after tactile discrimination tasks, indicating an engagement of the somatosensory system during stimulus encoding. On a group level both the oscillatory power and the evoked potential amplitudes were not modulated by tACS neither after tactile finger stimulation nor after median nerve stimulation as compared to sham stimulation. On an individual level we could however demonstrate that lower angular difference (i.e., differences between the injected current vector in the target region and the source orientation vector) is associated with significantly higher changes in both P20/N20 and N30/P30 source activities. Our findings suggest that the higher the directionality of the injected current correlates to the dipole orientation the greater the tACS-induced aftereffects are.

Citing Articles

Comparing the performance of beamformer algorithms in estimating orientations of neural sources.

Buschermohle Y, Holtershinken M, Erdbrugger T, Radecke J, Sprenger A, Schneider T iScience. 2024; 27(3):109150.

PMID: 38420593 PMC: 10901088. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109150.


Normative tDCS over V5 and FEF reveals practice-induced modulation of extraretinal smooth pursuit mechanisms, but no specific stimulation effect.

Radecke J, Sprenger A, Stockler H, Espeter L, Reichhardt M, Thomann L Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):21380.

PMID: 38049419 PMC: 10695990. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48313-z.

References
1.
Vossen A, Gross J, Thut G . Alpha Power Increase After Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation at Alpha Frequency (α-tACS) Reflects Plastic Changes Rather Than Entrainment. Brain Stimul. 2015; 8(3):499-508. PMC: 4464304. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.12.004. View

2.
Piastra M, Nussing A, Vorwerk J, Clerc M, Engwer C, Wolters C . A comprehensive study on electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography sensitivity to cortical and subcortical sources. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020; 42(4):978-992. PMC: 7856654. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25272. View

3.
Wittenberg M, Morr M, Schnitzler A, Lange J . 10 Hz tACS Over Somatosensory Cortex Does Not Modulate Supra-Threshold Tactile Temporal Discrimination in Humans. Front Neurosci. 2019; 13:311. PMC: 6456678. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00311. View

4.
Nitsche M, Paulus W . Transcranial direct current stimulation--update 2011. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011; 29(6):463-92. DOI: 10.3233/RNN-2011-0618. View

5.
Reato D, Rahman A, Bikson M, Parra L . Effects of weak transcranial alternating current stimulation on brain activity-a review of known mechanisms from animal studies. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:687. PMC: 3805939. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00687. View