Expanding the Parameter Space of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2019 Dec 5

PMID 31796827

Citations 48

Authors

Desmond Agboada

Mohsen Mosayebi Samani

Asif Jamil

Min-Fang Kuo

Michael A Nitsche

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Size and duration of the neuroplastic effects of tDCS depend on stimulation parameters, including stimulation duration and intensity of current. The impact of stimulation parameters on physiological effects is partially non-linear. To improve the utility of this intervention, it is critical to gather information about the impact of stimulation duration and intensity on neuroplasticity, while expanding the parameter space to improve efficacy. Anodal tDCS of 1-3 mA current intensity was applied for 15-30 minutes to study motor cortex plasticity. Sixteen healthy right-handed non-smoking volunteers participated in 10 sessions (intensity-duration pairs) of stimulation in a randomized cross-over design. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced motor-evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded as outcome measures of tDCS effects until next evening after tDCS. All active stimulation conditions enhanced motor cortex excitability within the first 2 hours after stimulation. We observed no significant differences between the three stimulation intensities and durations on cortical excitability. A trend for larger cortical excitability enhancements was however observed for higher current intensities (1 vs 3 mA). These results add information about intensified tDCS protocols and suggest that the impact of anodal tDCS on neuroplasticity is relatively robust with respect to gradual alterations of stimulation intensity, and duration.

Citing Articles

Timing of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation to the nondominant primary motor cortex fails to modulate cortical hemodynamic activity and improve motor sequence learning.

Jin M, Xu X, Zhang Z, Xia W, Lou X, Bai Z J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):17.

PMID: 39891195 PMC: 11783929. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-025-01546-7.

A study of long-term GABA and high-energy phosphate alterations in the primary motor cortex using anodal tDCS and H/P MR spectroscopy.

Patel H, Stollberg L, Choi C, Nitsche M, Jon Shah N, Binkofski F Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1461417.

PMID: 39734666 PMC: 11672121. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1461417.

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulates quadriceps motor cortex inhibition and facilitation during rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a triple-blind, randomised controlled proof of....

Murphy M, Sylvester C, Whife C, DAlessandro P, Rio E, Vallence A BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2024; 10(4):e002080.

PMID: 39659706 PMC: 11629017. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002080.

TDCS over PPC or DLPFC does not improve visual working memory capacity.

Jiang S, Jones M, von Bastian C Commun Psychol. 2024; 2(1):20.

PMID: 39242793 PMC: 11332112. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-024-00067-8.

Neurocognitive effects of 3 mA prefrontal electrical stimulation in schizophrenia: A randomized sham-controlled tDCS-fMRI study protocol.

Hallajian A, Sharifi K, Rostami R, Saeed F, Mokarian Rajabi S, Zangenehnia N PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0306422.

PMID: 39150917 PMC: 11329159. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306422.

References

Malenka R, Bear M . LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches. Neuron. 2004; 44(1):5-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.012. View

Lisman J . Three Ca2+ levels affect plasticity differently: the LTP zone, the LTD zone and no man's land. J Physiol. 2001; 532(Pt 2):285. PMC: 2278561. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0285f.x. View

Jamil A, Batsikadze G, Kuo H, Labruna L, Hasan A, Paulus W . Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2016; 595(4):1273-1288. PMC: 5309387. DOI: 10.1113/JP272738. View

Wiethoff S, Hamada M, Rothwell J . Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. Brain Stimul. 2014; 7(3):468-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.003. View

Woods A, Antal A, Bikson M, Boggio P, Brunoni A, Celnik P . A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015; 127(2):1031-1048. PMC: 4747791. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.012. View

Shin Y, Foerster A, Nitsche M . Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) - application in neuropsychology. Neuropsychologia. 2015; 69:154-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.002. View

Rohan J, Carhuatanta K, McInturf S, Miklasevich M, Jankord R . Modulating Hippocampal Plasticity with In Vivo Brain Stimulation. J Neurosci. 2015; 35(37):12824-32. PMC: 4643097. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2376-15.2015. View

Nitsche M, Liebetanz D, Schlitterlau A, Henschke U, Fricke K, Frommann K . GABAergic modulation of DC stimulation-induced motor cortex excitability shifts in humans. Eur J Neurosci. 2004; 19(10):2720-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03398.x. View

Kidgell D, Daly R, Young K, Lum J, Tooley G, Jaberzadeh S . Different current intensities of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation do not differentially modulate motor cortex plasticity. Neural Plast. 2013; 2013:603502. PMC: 3614037. DOI: 10.1155/2013/603502. View

10.

Monte-Silva K, Kuo M, Hessenthaler S, Fresnoza S, Liebetanz D, Paulus W . Induction of late LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex by repeated non-invasive brain stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2012; 6(3):424-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.04.011. View

11.

Polania R, Nitsche M, Ruff C . Studying and modifying brain function with non-invasive brain stimulation. Nat Neurosci. 2018; 21(2):174-187. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-017-0054-4. View

12.

Reymann K, Frey J . The late maintenance of hippocampal LTP: requirements, phases, 'synaptic tagging', 'late-associativity' and implications. Neuropharmacology. 2006; 52(1):24-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2006.07.026. View

13.

Liebetanz D, Nitsche M, Tergau F, Paulus W . Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain. 2002; 125(Pt 10):2238-47. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf238. View

14.

Batsikadze G, Moliadze V, Paulus W, Kuo M, Nitsche M . Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans. J Physiol. 2013; 591(7):1987-2000. PMC: 3624864. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.249730. View

15.

Bikson M, Grossman P, Thomas C, Zannou A, Jiang J, Adnan T . Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016. Brain Stimul. 2016; 9(5):641-661. PMC: 5007190. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.004. View

16.

Feise R . Do multiple outcome measures require p-value adjustment?. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002; 2:8. PMC: 117123. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-2-8. View

17.

Brunoni A, Amadera J, Berbel B, Volz M, Rizzerio B, Fregni F . A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011; 14(8):1133-45. DOI: 10.1017/S1461145710001690. View

18.

Ammann C, Lindquist M, Celnik P . Response variability of different anodal transcranial direct current stimulation intensities across multiple sessions. Brain Stimul. 2017; 10(4):757-763. PMC: 5511514. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.04.003. View

19.

Esmaeilpour Z, Marangolo P, Hampstead B, Bestmann S, Galletta E, Knotkova H . Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes. Brain Stimul. 2017; 11(2):310-321. PMC: 7050474. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.002. View

20.

Martins C, Rodrigues L, Nitsche M, Nakamura-Palacios E . AMPA receptors are involved in prefrontal direct current stimulation effects on long-term working memory and GAP-43 expression. Behav Brain Res. 2019; 362:208-212. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.01.023. View