» Articles » PMID: 29146468

TDCS Changes in Motor Excitability Are Specific to Orientation of Current Flow

Overview
Journal Brain Stimul
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Nov 18
PMID 29146468
Citations 69
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Measurements and models of current flow in the brain during transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) indicate stimulation of regions in-between electrodes. Moreover, the folded cortex results in local fluctuations in current flow intensity and direction, and animal studies suggest current flow direction relative to cortical columns determines response to tDCS.

Methods: Here we test this idea by using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Motor Evoked Potentials (TMS-MEP) to measure changes in corticospinal excitability following tDCS applied with electrodes aligned orthogonal (across) or parallel to M1 in the central sulcus.

Results: Current flow models predicted that the orthogonal electrode montage produces consistently oriented current across the hand region of M1 that flows along cortical columns, while the parallel electrode montage produces non-uniform current directions across the M1 cortical surface. We find that orthogonal, but not parallel, orientated tDCS modulates TMS-MEPs. We also show modulation is sensitive to the orientation of the TMS coil (PA or AP), which is thought to select different afferent pathways to M1.

Conclusions: Our results are consistent with tDCS producing directionally specific neuromodulation in brain regions in-between electrodes, but shows nuanced changes in excitability that are presumably current direction relative to column and axon pathway specific. We suggest that the direction of current flow through cortical target regions should be considered for targeting and dose-control of tDCS.

Citing Articles

Machine learning-optimized non-invasive brain stimulation and treatment response classification for major depression.

Albizu A, Indahlastari A, Suen P, Huang Z, Waner J, Stolte S Bioelectron Med. 2024; 10(1):25.

PMID: 39473014 PMC: 11524011. DOI: 10.1186/s42234-024-00157-2.


Simulating tDCS electrode placement to stimulate both M1 and SMA enhances motor performance and modulates cortical excitability depending on current flow direction.

Sato T, Katagiri N, Suganuma S, Laakso I, Tanabe S, Osu R Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1362607.

PMID: 39010941 PMC: 11246916. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1362607.


Anodal M1 tDCS enhances online learning of rhythmic timing videogame skill.

Meek A, Greenwell D, Nishio H, Poston B, Riley Z PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0295373.

PMID: 38870202 PMC: 11175489. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295373.


Induced neural phase precession through exogenous electric fields.

Wischnewski M, Tran H, Zhao Z, Shirinpour S, Haigh Z, Rotteveel J Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):1687.

PMID: 38402188 PMC: 10894208. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45898-5.


Optimizing electrode placement for transcranial direct current stimulation in nonsuperficial cortical regions: a computational modeling study.

Choi D, Lee S Biomed Eng Lett. 2024; 14(2):255-265.

PMID: 38374912 PMC: 10874366. DOI: 10.1007/s13534-023-00335-2.


References
1.
Laakso I, Tanaka S, Koyama S, De Santis V, Hirata A . Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS. Brain Stimul. 2015; 8(5):906-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.05.002. View

2.
Pena-Gomez C, Sala-Lonch R, Junque C, Clemente I, Vidal D, Bargallo N . Modulation of large-scale brain networks by transcranial direct current stimulation evidenced by resting-state functional MRI. Brain Stimul. 2011; 5(3):252-263. PMC: 3589751. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.08.006. View

3.
Wiethoff S, Hamada M, Rothwell J . Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. Brain Stimul. 2014; 7(3):468-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.003. View

4.
Truong D, Magerowski G, Blackburn G, Bikson M, Alonso-Alonso M . Computational modeling of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in obesity: Impact of head fat and dose guidelines. Neuroimage Clin. 2013; 2:759-66. PMC: 3778260. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.05.011. View

5.
Kuo H, Bikson M, Datta A, Minhas P, Paulus W, Kuo M . Comparing cortical plasticity induced by conventional and high-definition 4 × 1 ring tDCS: a neurophysiological study. Brain Stimul. 2012; 6(4):644-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.09.010. View