A Wide-angle Lens to Focus on Coronary Bifurcational Lesions

Overview

Journal Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc

Date 2022 Mar 14

PMID 35281757

Authors

Flavio Airoldi

Luca Paolo Alberti

Davide Tavano

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

References

Chen S, Xu B, Han Y, Sheiban I, Zhang J, Ye F . Clinical Outcome After DK Crush Versus Culotte Stenting of Distal Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: The 3-Year Follow-Up Results of the DKCRUSH-III Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8(10):1335-1342. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.05.017. View

Sheiban I, Albiero R, Marsico F, Dharmadhikari A, Tzifos V, Pagnotta P . Immediate and long-term results of "T" stenting for bifurcation coronary lesions. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 85(9):1141-4, A9. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00712-8. View

Inohara T, Kohsaka S, Spertus J, Masoudi F, Rumsfeld J, Kennedy K . Comparative Trends in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Japan and the United States, 2013 to 2017. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 76(11):1328-1340. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.037. View

Kumsars I, Holm N, Niemela M, Erglis A, Kervinen K, Christiansen E . Randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV. Open Heart. 2020; 7(1):e000947. PMC: 6999681. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000947. View

Maeng M, Holm N, Erglis A, Kumsars I, Niemela M, Kervinen K . Long-term results after simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: Nordic Bifurcation Study 5-year follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62(1):30-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.015. View

Chen S, Santoso T, Zhang J, Ye F, Xu Y, Fu Q . Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus.... Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10(2). PMC: 5319391. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004497. View

Jensen J, Galloe A, Lassen J, Erglis A, Kumsars I, Steigen T . Safety in simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions. The nordic bifurcation study 14-month follow-up results. EuroIntervention. 2008; 4(2):229-33. DOI: 10.4244/eijv4i2a41. View

Murasato Y, Yamaji K, Kohsaka S, Wada H, Ishii H, Kinoshita Y . Percutaneous coronary intervention in side branch coronary arteries: Insights from the Japanese nationwide registry. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021; 36:100856. PMC: 8374521. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100856. View

Maron D, Hochman J, Reynolds H, Bangalore S, OBrien S, Boden W . Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(15):1395-1407. PMC: 7263833. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915922. View

10.

Koo B, Waseda K, Kang H, Kim H, Nam C, Hur S . Anatomic and functional evaluation of bifurcation lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3(2):113-9. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.887406. View

11.

Burzotta F, Lassen J, Lefevre T, Banning A, Chatzizisis Y, Johnson T . Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary lesions: the 15 consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention. 2020; 16(16):1307-1317. PMC: 8919527. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00169. View

12.

Behan M, Holm N, Curzen N, Erglis A, Stables R, de Belder A . Simple or complex stenting for bifurcation coronary lesions: a patient-level pooled-analysis of the Nordic Bifurcation Study and the British Bifurcation Coronary Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 4(1):57-64. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.958512. View

13.

Colombo A, Chieffo A . One versus two stents: the cause or the effect?. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 7(3):264-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.10.019. View

14.

Hildick-Smith D, de Belder A, Cooter N, Curzen N, Clayton T, Oldroyd K . Randomized trial of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions: the British Bifurcation Coronary Study: old, new, and evolving strategies. Circulation. 2010; 121(10):1235-43. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.888297. View

15.

Al Suwaidi J, Berger P, Rihal C, Garratt K, Bell M, TING H . Immediate and long-term outcome of intracoronary stent implantation for true bifurcation lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35(4):929-36. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00648-8. View

16.

Morice M, Serruys P, Sousa J, Fajadet J, Ban Hayashi E, Perin M . A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(23):1773-80. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa012843. View

17.

Lefevre T, Louvard Y, Morice M, Dumas P, Loubeyre C, Benslimane A . Stenting of bifurcation lesions: classification, treatments, and results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000; 49(3):274-83. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(200003)49:3<274::aid-ccd11>3.0.co;2-n. View

18.

Koo B, Kang H, Youn T, Chae I, Choi D, Kim H . Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46(4):633-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.054. View

19.

Koh Y, Kim P, Chang K, Park H, Jeong M, Kim H . Long-term clinical outcomes of the one-stent technique versus the two-stent technique for non-left main true coronary bifurcation disease in the era of drug-eluting stents. J Interv Cardiol. 2013; 26(3):245-53. DOI: 10.1111/joic.12025. View

20.

Kim H, Doh J, Lim H, Nam C, Shin E, Koo B . Identification of Coronary Artery Side Branch Supplying Myocardial Mass That May Benefit From Revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10(6):571-581. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.033. View