» Articles » PMID: 20407111

Anatomic and Functional Evaluation of Bifurcation Lesions Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Abstract

Background: We sought to investigate the mechanism of geometric changes after main branch (MB) stent implantation and to identify the predictors of functionally significant "jailed" side branch (SB) lesions.

Methods And Results: Seventy-seven patients with bifurcation lesions were prospectively enrolled from 8 centers. MB intravascular ultrasound was performed before and after MB stent implantation, and fractional flow reserve was measured in the jailed SB. The vessel volume index of both the proximal and distal MB was increased after stent implantation. The plaque volume index decreased in the proximal MB (9.1+/-3.0 to 8.4+/-2.4 mm(3)/mm, P=0.001), implicating plaque shift, but not in the distal MB (5.4+/-1.8 to 5.3+/-1.7 mm(3)/mm, P=0.227), implicating carina shifting to account for the change in vessel size (N=56). The mean SB fractional flow reserve was 0.71+/-0.20 (N=68) and 43% of the lesions were functionally significant. Binary logistic-regression analysis revealed that preintervention % diameter stenosis of the SB (odds ratio=1.05; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.09) and the MB minimum lumen diameter located distal to the SB ostium (odds ratio=3.86; 95% CI, 1.03 to 14.43) were independent predictors of functionally significant SB jailing. In patients with > or =75% stenosis and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow in the SB, no difference in post-stent angiographic and intravascular ultrasound parameters was found between SB lesions with and without functional significance.

Conclusions: Both plaque shift from the MB and carina shift contribute to the creation/aggravation of an SB ostial lesion after MB stent implantation. Anatomic evaluation does not reliably predict the functional significance of a jailed SB stenosis.

Citing Articles

Clinical prognostic value of a novel quantitative flow ratio from a single projection in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with the provisional approach.

Kan J, Ge Z, Nie S, Gao X, Li X, Sheiban I AsiaIntervention. 2023; 9(2):114-123.

PMID: 37736199 PMC: 10507452. DOI: 10.4244/AIJ-D-22-00045.


A wide-angle lens to focus on coronary bifurcational lesions.

Airoldi F, Alberti L, Tavano D Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022; 39:100983.

PMID: 35281757 PMC: 8904592. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.100983.


Fractional Flow Reserve: Patient Selection and Perspectives.

Peper J, Becker L, Van Kuijk J, Leiner T, Swaans M Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2021; 17:817-831.

PMID: 34934324 PMC: 8684425. DOI: 10.2147/VHRM.S286916.


Towards a common pathway for the treatment of left main disease: contemporary evidence and future directions: Left main disease treatment.

Milasinovic D, Stankovic G AsiaIntervention. 2021; 7(2):85-95.

PMID: 34913011 PMC: 8670569. DOI: 10.4244/AIJ-D-21-00022.


Predictors and 3-year outcomes of compromised left circumflex coronary artery after left main crossover stenting.

Ullah H, Elakabawi K, Ke H, Ullah N, Ullah H, Shah S Clin Cardiol. 2021; 44(10):1377-1385.

PMID: 34269478 PMC: 8495093. DOI: 10.1002/clc.23693.