» Articles » PMID: 26315736

Clinical Outcome After DK Crush Versus Culotte Stenting of Distal Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: The 3-Year Follow-Up Results of the DKCRUSH-III Study

Abstract

Objectives: The present study aimed to investigate the difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 3 years after double-kissing (DK) crush versus culotte stenting for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (LMDBLs).

Background: The multicenter and randomized DKCRUSH-III (Comparison of double kissing crush versus culotte stenting for unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions: results from a multicenter, randomized, prospective study) showed that DK crush stenting was associated with fewer MACE at 1-year follow-up in patients with LMDBLs compared with culotte stenting. Here, we report the 3-year clinical outcome of the DKCRUSH-III study.

Methods: A total of 419 patients with LMDBLs who were randomly assigned to either the DK crush or culotte group in the DKCRUSH-III study were followed for 3 year. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a MACE at 3 years. Stent thrombosis (ST) was the safety endpoint. Patients were classified by simple and complex LMDBLs according to the DEFINITION (Definition and Impact of Complex Bifurcation Lesions on Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Drug-Eluting Stents) study criteria.

Results: At 3 years, MACE occurred in 49 patients the culotte group and in 17 patients in the DK crush group (cumulative event rates of 23.7% and 8.2%, respectively; p < 0.001), mainly driven by increased myocardial infarction (8.2% vs. 3.4%, respectively; p = 0.037) and target-vessel revascularization (18.8% vs. 5.8%, respectively; p < 0.001) between groups. Definite ST rate was 3.4% in the culotte group and 0% in the DK crush group (p = 0.007). Complex LMDBLs were associated with a higher rate of MACE (35.3%) at 3 years compared with a rate of 8.1% in patients with simple LMDBLs (p < 0.001), with an extremely higher rate in the culotte group (51.5% vs. 15.1%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Culotte stenting for LMDBLs was associated with significantly increased rates of MACE and ST. (Double Kissing [DK] Crush Versus Culotte Stenting for the Treatment of Unprotected Distal Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-III, a Multicenter Randomized Study Comparing Double-Stent Techniques; ChiCTR-TRC-11001877).

Citing Articles

Left Main Disease and Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Focus on Antithrombotic Therapy.

Varlamos C, Lianos I, Benetou D, Alexopoulos D US Cardiol. 2024; 15:e11.

PMID: 39720505 PMC: 11664771. DOI: 10.15420/usc.2020.34.


Comparative Short-Term Outcomes of Double-Kissing Culotte and Culotte Techniques in Acute Coronary Syndrome from the Lower Silesia Culotte Bifurcation Registry.

Barycki M, Wlodarczak A, Wlodarczak S, Pecherzewski M, Wlodarczak P, Jastrzebski A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685851 PMC: 11642240. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237392.


An Approach to Non-left Main Bifurcation Lesions: A Contemporary Review.

Calik A, Cader F, Rafflenbeul E, Okutucu S, Khan S, Canbolat I US Cardiol. 2024; 17:e10.

PMID: 39493947 PMC: 11526486. DOI: 10.15420/usc.2022.25.


Immediate, Short-Term, Intermediate, and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of True Bifurcation Stenting.

Qadir M, Ali A, Khalid F, Umar Khan B, Saifullah Khan I, Akbar A Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e67251.

PMID: 39301385 PMC: 11411170. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67251.


The Balloon-Assisted Double-Kissing T-Stenting Technique: Concept, In Vitro Model, and Case Examples.

Rinfret S, Verreault-Julien L, Croce K J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024; 3(7):101928.

PMID: 39132000 PMC: 11307903. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101928.