» Articles » PMID: 35277591

Environment and Body-brain Interplay Affect Inhibition and Decision-making

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Mar 12
PMID 35277591
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The fine-tuned interplay of brain and body underlies human ability to cope with changes in the internal and external milieus. Previous research showed that cardiac interoceptive changes (e.g., cardiac phase) affect cognitive functions, notably inhibition that is a key element for adaptive behaviour. Here we investigated the influence on cognition of vestibular signal, which provides the brain with sensory information about body position and movement. We used a centrifuge-based design to disrupt vestibular signal in healthy human volunteers while their inhibition and decision-making functions were assessed with the stop-signal paradigm. Participants performed the standard and a novel, sensorial version of the stop-signal task to determine whether disrupted vestibular signal influences cognition as a function of its relevance to the context. First, we showed that disrupted vestibular signal was associated with a larger variability of longest inhibition latencies, meaning that participants were even slower to inhibit in the trials where they had the most difficulty inhibiting. Second, we revealed that processing of bodily information, as required in the sensorial stop-signal task, also led to a larger variability of longest inhibition latencies, which was all the more important when vestibular signal was disrupted. Lastly, we found that such a degraded response inhibition performance was due in part to the acceleration of decision-making process, meaning that participants made a decision more quickly even when strength of sensory evidence was reduced. Taken together, these novel findings provide direct evidence that vestibular signal affects the cognitive functions of inhibition and decision-making.

References
1.
Chambers C, Garavan H, Bellgrove M . Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008; 33(5):631-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.016. View

2.
Sanchez-Tena M, Alvarez-Peregrina C, Valbuena-Iglesias M, Ruisoto Palomera P . Optical Illusions and Spatial Disorientation in Aviation Pilots. J Med Syst. 2018; 42(5):79. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-018-0935-4. View

3.
Salvato G, Richter F, Sedeno L, Bottini G, Paulesu E . Building the bodily self-awareness: Evidence for the convergence between interoceptive and exteroceptive information in a multilevel kernel density analysis study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019; 41(2):401-418. PMC: 7268061. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24810. View

4.
Rae C, Botan V, Gould van Praag C, Herman A, Nyyssonen J, Watson D . Response inhibition on the stop signal task improves during cardiac contraction. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):9136. PMC: 6002409. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27513-y. View

5.
Heathcote A, Lin Y, Reynolds A, Strickland L, Gretton M, Matzke D . Dynamic models of choice. Behav Res Methods. 2018; 51(2):961-985. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-1067-y. View