A Consensus Guide to Capturing the Ability to Inhibit Actions and Impulsive Behaviors in the Stop-signal Task

Response inhibition is essential for navigating everyday life. Its derailment is considered integral to numerous neurological and psychiatric disorders, and more generally, to a wide range of behavioral and health problems. Response-inhibition efficiency furthermore correlates with treatment outcome in some of these conditions. The stop-signal task is an essential tool to determine how quickly response inhibition is implemented. Despite its apparent simplicity, there are many features (ranging from task design to data analysis) that vary across studies in ways that can easily compromise the validity of the obtained results. Our goal is to facilitate a more accurate use of the stop-signal task. To this end, we provide 12 easy-to-implement consensus recommendations and point out the problems that can arise when they are not followed. Furthermore, we provide user-friendly open-source resources intended to inform statistical-power considerations, facilitate the correct implementation of the task, and assist in proper data analysis.

Citing Articles

Parietal cortex is recruited by frontal and cingulate areas to support action monitoring and updating during stopping.

Kang J, Mattar L, Vergara J, Gobo V, Rey H, Heilbronner S bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40060422 PMC: 11888462. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.28.640787.

Reduced temporal and spatial stability of neural activity patterns predict cognitive control deficits in children with ADHD.

Gao Z, Duberg K, Warren S, Zheng L, Hinshaw S, Menon V Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):2346.

PMID: 40057478 PMC: 11890578. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57685-x.

Mitigating Ethnic Moral Disengagement: The Role of Inhibitory Control, Cognitive Reflection, and Growth-Oriented Personal Values from an Integrative Perspective.

Corbelli G, Paciello M, Sportelli C, Cicirelli P, DErrico F Behav Sci (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40001800 PMC: 11852329. DOI: 10.3390/bs15020169.

Understanding and targeting repetitive behaviors and restricted interests in autism spectrum disorder via high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation: a study-protocol.

Lazzaro G, Passarini S, Battisti A, Costanzo F, Garone G, Mercier M BMC Psychiatry. 2025; 25(1):170.

PMID: 40001028 PMC: 11863796. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-06506-y.

Transdiagnostic Connectome-Based Prediction of Response Inhibition.

Lv Q, Wang X, Kang N, Wang X, Lin P Hum Brain Mapp. 2025; 46(3):e70158.

PMID: 39972946 PMC: 11839765. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70158.

References

Logan G, Van Zandt T, Verbruggen F, Wagenmakers E . On the ability to inhibit thought and action: general and special theories of an act of control. Psychol Rev. 2014; 121(1):66-95. DOI: 10.1037/a0035230. View

Verbruggen F, Chambers C, Logan G . Fictitious inhibitory differences: how skewness and slowing distort the estimation of stopping latencies. Psychol Sci. 2013; 24(3):352-62. PMC: 3724271. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612457390. View

Chambers C, Garavan H, Bellgrove M . Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008; 33(5):631-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.016. View

Smith J, Mattick R, Jamadar S, Iredale J . Deficits in behavioural inhibition in substance abuse and addiction: a meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014; 145:1-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.08.009. View

Schall J, Palmeri T, Logan G . Models of inhibitory control. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017; 372(1718). PMC: 5332852. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0193. View

Bissett P, Logan G . Selective stopping? Maybe not. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013; 143(1):455-72. PMC: 3728275. DOI: 10.1037/a0032122. View

Leunissen I, Zandbelt B, Potocanac Z, Swinnen S, Coxon J . Reliable estimation of inhibitory efficiency: to anticipate, choose or simply react?. Eur J Neurosci. 2017; 45(12):1512-1523. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13590. View

Band G, van der Molen M, Logan G . Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2003; 112(2):105-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(02)00079-3. View

Boucher L, Palmeri T, Logan G, Schall J . Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades. Psychol Rev. 2007; 114(2):376-97. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.376. View

10.

Tannock R, Schachar R, Carr R, Chajczyk D, Logan G . Effects of methylphenidate on inhibitory control in hyperactive children. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1989; 17(5):473-91. DOI: 10.1007/BF00916508. View

11.

Logan G, Yamaguchi M, Schall J, Palmeri T . Inhibitory control in mind and brain 2.0: blocked-input models of saccadic countermanding. Psychol Rev. 2015; 122(2):115-47. PMC: 4556000. DOI: 10.1037/a0038893. View

12.

Bari A, Robbins T . Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control. Prog Neurobiol. 2013; 108:44-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.06.005. View

13.

Congdon E, Mumford J, Cohen J, Galvan A, Canli T, Poldrack R . Measurement and reliability of response inhibition. Front Psychol. 2012; 3:37. PMC: 3283117. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00037. View

14.

Matzke D, Curley S, Gong C, Heathcote A . Inhibiting responses to difficult choices. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019; 148(1):124-142. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000525. View

15.

Nelson M, Boucher L, Logan G, Palmeri T, Schall J . Nonindependent and nonstationary response times in stopping and stepping saccade tasks. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010; 72(7):1913-29. PMC: 3237060. DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.7.1913. View

16.

Wilkinson M, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg I, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A . The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016; 3:160018. PMC: 4792175. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18. View

17.

Vince M . The intermittency of control movements and the psychological refractory period. Br J Psychol Gen Sect. 1948; 38(Pt 3):149-57. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1948.tb01150.x. View

18.

Nosek B, Ebersole C, DeHaven A, Mellor D . The preregistration revolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(11):2600-2606. PMC: 5856500. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1708274114. View

19.

Lipszyc J, Schachar R . Inhibitory control and psychopathology: a meta-analysis of studies using the stop signal task. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010; 16(6):1064-76. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617710000895. View

20.

Aron A . From reactive to proactive and selective control: developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses. Biol Psychiatry. 2010; 69(12):e55-68. PMC: 3039712. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.024. View