» Articles » PMID: 35276999

A Narrative Review of the Evidence for Variations in Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentration Thresholds for Optimal Health

Overview
Journal Nutrients
Date 2022 Mar 12
PMID 35276999
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Vitamin D has many important health benefits. Unfortunately, these benefits are not widely known among health care personnel and the general public. As a result, most of the world's population has serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations far below optimal values. This narrative review examines the evidence for the major causes of death including cardiovascular disease, hypertension, cancer, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and COVID-19 with regard to sub-optimal 25(OH)D concentrations. Evidence for the beneficial effects comes from a variety of approaches including ecological and observational studies, studies of mechanisms, and Mendelian randomization studies. Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are generally considered the strongest form of evidence for pharmaceutical drugs, the study designs and the conduct of RCTs performed for vitamin D have mostly been flawed for the following reasons: they have been based on vitamin D dose rather than on baseline and achieved 25(OH)D concentrations; they have involved participants with 25(OH)D concentrations above the population mean; they have given low vitamin D doses; and they have permitted other sources of vitamin D. Thus, the strongest evidence generally comes from the other types of studies. The general finding is that optimal 25(OH)D concentrations to support health and wellbeing are above 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L) for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality rate, whereas the thresholds for several other outcomes appear to range up to 40 or 50 ng/mL. The most efficient way to achieve these concentrations is through vitamin D supplementation. Although additional studies are warranted, raising serum 25(OH)D concentrations to optimal concentrations will result in a significant reduction in preventable illness and death.

Citing Articles

Vitamin D Deficiency Meets Hill's Criteria for Causation in SARS-CoV-2 Susceptibility, Complications, and Mortality: A Systematic Review.

Wimalawansa S Nutrients. 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39940457 PMC: 11820523. DOI: 10.3390/nu17030599.


Physical activity, Vitamin D, and all-cause/cardiovascular mortality: a prospective study in older Chinese adults.

Chen M, Cheng L, Yang S, Zhang Y BMC Geriatr. 2025; 25(1):38.

PMID: 39819506 PMC: 11740327. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-025-05687-1.


Insights in Nutrition to Optimize Type 1 Diabetes Therapy.

Cadario F Nutrients. 2024; 16(21).

PMID: 39519472 PMC: 11547730. DOI: 10.3390/nu16213639.


The impact of supplementing vitamin D through different methods on the prognosis of COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhang X, Wu J, Dong H, Shang N, Li Y, Zhang Y Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1441847.

PMID: 39385791 PMC: 11462671. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1441847.


Daily and Weekly "High Doses" of Cholecalciferol for the Prevention and Treatment of Vitamin D Deficiency for Obese or Multi-Morbidity and Multi-Treatment Patients Requiring Multi-Drugs-A Narrative Review.

Pludowski P, Marcinowska-Suchowierska E, Togizbayev G, Belaya Z, Grant W, Pilz S Nutrients. 2024; 16(15).

PMID: 39125420 PMC: 11314300. DOI: 10.3390/nu16152541.


References
1.
Meltzer D, Best T, Zhang H, Vokes T, Arora V, Solway J . Association of Vitamin D Levels, Race/Ethnicity, and Clinical Characteristics With COVID-19 Test Results. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(3):e214117. PMC: 7980095. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4117. View

2.
Shirvani A, Kalajian T, Song A, Holick M . Disassociation of Vitamin D's Calcemic Activity and Non-calcemic Genomic Activity and Individual Responsiveness: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Clinical Trial. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):17685. PMC: 6881448. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-53864-1. View

3.
Madden J, Murphy L, Zgaga L, Bennett K . De novo vitamin D supplement use post-diagnosis is associated with breast cancer survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018; 172(1):179-190. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4896-6. View

4.
Ong J, Cuellar-Partida G, Lu Y, Fasching P, Hein A, Burghaus S . Association of vitamin D levels and risk of ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomization study. Int J Epidemiol. 2016; 45(5):1619-1630. PMC: 5100621. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw207. View

5.
Gianella F, Hsia C, Sakhaee K . The role of vitamin D in sarcoidosis. Fac Rev. 2021; 9:14. PMC: 7886067. DOI: 10.12703/b/9-14. View