» Articles » PMID: 33739433

Association of Vitamin D Levels, Race/Ethnicity, and Clinical Characteristics With COVID-19 Test Results

Overview
Journal JAMA Netw Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Mar 19
PMID 33739433
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Deficient (ie, <20 ng/mL) or insufficient (ie, 20 to <30 ng/mL) 25-hydroxyvitamin D (also known as calcifediol) levels are more common in Black individuals than White individuals and are associated with increased coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) risk. Whether COVID-19 risk is associated with differences in vitamin D levels of 30 ng/mL or greater is not known.

Objective: To examine whether COVID-19 test results are associated with differences in vitamin D levels of 30 ng/mL or greater, including for White individuals and for Black individuals.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at an academic medical center in Chicago, Illinois. Participants included individuals with data on vitamin D level within 365 days before COVID-19 testing, which was conducted from March 3 to December 30, 2020. Data were analyzed from September 11, 2020, to February 5, 2021.

Exposures: The last vitamin D level before COVID-19 testing was categorized as less than 20 ng/mL (ie, deficient), 20 to less than 30 ng/mL (ie, insufficient), 30 to less than 40 ng/mL, or 40 ng/mL or greater. Treatment was defined by vitamin D type and dose 14 days before COVID-19 testing and treatment changes after last vitamin D level.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The main outcome was a positive result for COVID-19 in polymerase chain reaction testing. Multivariable analyses tested whether previously measured vitamin D level was associated with having test results positive for COVID-19 in White individuals and in Black individuals, controlling for months and treatment changes since the vitamin D level was measured, as well as demographic characteristics and comorbidity indicators.

Results: A total of 4638 individuals (mean [SD] age 52.8 [19.5] years; 3205 [69%] women) had data for a vitamin D level within 1 year before COVID-19 testing, including 2288 (49%) Black individuals, 1999 (43%) White individuals, and 351 individuals (8%) who were another race/ethnicity (eg, Asian, Mideast Indian, >1 race). Stratified by vitamin D level, 1251 individuals (27%) had less than 20 ng/mL, 1267 individuals (27%) had 20 to less than 30 ng/mL, 1023 individuals (22%) had 30 to less than 40 ng/mL, and 1097 individuals (24%) had 40 ng/mL or greater. Lower vitamin D levels were more common in Black individuals (<20 ng/mL: 829 of 2288 Black individuals [36%]) than White individuals (<20 ng/mL: 315 of 1999 White individuals [16%]). A total of 333 individuals (7%) had test results positive for COVID-19, including 102 White individuals (5%) and 211 Black individuals (9%). Multivariate analysis controlling for time since last vitamin D level measurement was used to estimate the outcomes associated with levels 14 days before COVID-19 testing. A positive test result for COVID-19 was not significantly associated with vitamin D levels in White individuals but was associated with vitamin D levels in Black individuals (compared with ≥40 ng/mL: <20 ng/mL incidence rate ratio [IRR], 2.55 [95% CI, 1.26-5.15]; P = .009; 20 to <30 ng/mL IRR, 1.69 [95% CI, 0.75-3.84]; P = .21; 30 to <40 ng/mL IRR, 2.64 [95% CI, 1.24-5.66]; P = .01). Stratified by vitamin D level, estimated COVID-19 positivity rates in Black individuals were 9.72% (95% CI, 6.74%-13.41%) for individuals with a vitamin D level less than 20 ng/mL, 6.47% (95% CI, 3.33%-10.28%) for individuals with a vitamin D level of 20 to less than 30 ng/mL, 10.10% (95% CI, 6.00%-15.47%) for individuals with a vitamin D level of 30 to less than 40 ng/mL, and 3.82% (95% CI, 1.78%-6.68%) for individuals with a vitamin D level of 40 ng/mL or higher. Multivariate analysis in individuals with a vitamin D level of 30 ng/mL or greater found that the IRR of a positive COVID-19 test result was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99; P = .008) per 1-ng/mL increase in vitamin D overall and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98; P = .003) per 1-ng/mL increase in vitamin D in Black individuals.

Conclusions And Relevance: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, COVID-19 risk increased among Black individuals with vitamin D level less than 40 ng/mL compared with those with 40 ng/mL or greater and decreased with increasing levels among individuals with levels greater than 30 ng/mL. No significant associations were noted for White individuals. Randomized clinical trials should examine whether increasing vitamin D level to greater than 40 ng/mL affects COVID-19 risk.

Citing Articles

Effect of vitamin D status and vitamin D supplementation on immune function and prevention of acute respiratory tract infections in dark-skinned individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bournot A, Darling A, Givens I, Lovegrove J, Lanham-New S, Hart K Public Health Nutr. 2024; 27(1):e224.

PMID: 39465641 PMC: 11645122. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980024001861.


Racial/ethnic disparities in chronic wounds: Perspectives on linking upstream factors to health outcomes.

Cavalcante-Silva J, Fantuzzi G, Minshall R, Wu S, Oddo V, Koh T Wound Repair Regen. 2024; 32(5):770-779.

PMID: 38943351 PMC: 11578790. DOI: 10.1111/wrr.13200.


COVID-19: An Update on Epidemiology, Prevention and Treatment, September-2023.

Simsek-Yavuz S Infect Dis Clin Microbiol. 2024; 5(3):165-187.

PMID: 38633552 PMC: 10986731. DOI: 10.36519/idcm.2023.251.


Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and its association with cardiometabolic risk factors among healthcare workers in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa; cross-sectional study.

Adeniyi O, Masilela C, George J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):4756.

PMID: 38413628 PMC: 10899187. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54977-y.


Bone health following paediatric and adolescent bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mitra A, Das B, Sarraf K, Ford-Adams M, Fehervari M, Ashrafian H EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 69:102462.

PMID: 38333369 PMC: 10850131. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102462.


References
1.
Billington E, Burt L, Rose M, Davison E, Gaudet S, Kan M . Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019; 105(4). DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgz212. View

2.
Mohammad S, Mishra A, Ashraf M . Emerging Role of Vitamin D and its Associated Molecules in Pathways Related to Pathogenesis of Thrombosis. Biomolecules. 2019; 9(11). PMC: 6920963. DOI: 10.3390/biom9110649. View

3.
Zhang J, Iwashyna T, Christakis N . The performance of different lookback periods and sources of information for Charlson comorbidity adjustment in Medicare claims. Med Care. 1999; 37(11):1128-39. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199911000-00005. View

4.
Looker A, Johnson C, Lacher D, Pfeiffer C, Schleicher R, Sempos C . Vitamin D status: United States, 2001-2006. NCHS Data Brief. 2011; (59):1-8. View

5.
Meltzer D, Best T, Zhang H, Vokes T, Arora V, Solway J . Association of Vitamin D Status and Other Clinical Characteristics With COVID-19 Test Results. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3(9):e2019722. PMC: 7489852. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19722. View