» Articles » PMID: 35274044

Medical Student Portfolios: A Systematic Scoping Review

Abstract

Phenomenon: Medical Student Portfolios (MSP)s allow medical students to reflect and better appreciate their clinical, research and academic experiences which promotes their individual personal and professional development. However, differences in adoption rate, content design and practice setting create significant variability in their employ. With MSPs increasingly used to evaluate professional competencies and the student's professional identity formation (PIF), this has become an area of concern.

Approach: We adopt Krishna's Systematic Evidence-Based Approach to carry out a Systematic Scoping Review (SSR in SEBA) on MSPs. The structured search process of six databases, concurrent use of thematic and content analysis in the Split Approach and comparisons of the themes and categories with the tabulated summaries of included articles in the Jigsaw Perspective and Funnelling Process offers enhanced transparency and reproducibility to this review.

Findings: The research team retrieved 14501 abstracts, reviewed 779 full-text articles and included 96 articles. Similarities between the themes, categories and tabulated summaries allowed the identification of the following funnelled domains: Purpose of MSPs, Content and structure of MSPs, Strengths and limitations of MSPs, Methods to improve MSPs, and Use of E-portfolios.

Insights: Variability in the employ of MSPs arise as a result of a failure to recognise its different roles and uses. Here we propose additional roles of MSPs, in particular, building on a consistent set of content materials and assessments of milestones called micro-competencies. Whislt generalised micro-competencies assess achievement of general milestones expected of all medical students, personalised micro-competencies record attainment of particular skills, knowledge and attitudes balanced against the medical student's abilities, context and needs. This combination of micro-competencies in a consistent framework promises a holistic, authentic and longitudinal perspective of the medical student's development and maturing PIF.

Citing Articles

The impact of death and caring for the dying and their families on surgeons - an AI assisted systematic scoping review.

Tan J, Ong Y, Fam V, Sinnathamby A, Ravindran N, Ng Y BMC Surg. 2025; 25(1):56.

PMID: 39910529 PMC: 11796083. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-025-02792-1.


Integrating portfolio and mentorship in competency-based medical education: a Middle East experience.

Shadan M, Shalaby R, Ziganshina A, Ahmed S BMC Med Educ. 2025; 25(1):36.

PMID: 39780167 PMC: 11715465. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06553-1.


Bridging School and Practice? Barriers to the Integration of 'Boundary Objects' for Learning and Assessment in Clinical Nursing Education.

Stoffels M, Broeksma L, Barry M, van der Burgt S, Daelmans H, Peerdeman S Perspect Med Educ. 2024; 13(1):392-405.

PMID: 39006554 PMC: 11243767. DOI: 10.5334/pme.1103.


Physician-patient boundaries in palliative care.

Ho C, Lim N, Abdul Rahman N, Chiam M, Zhou J, Phua G BMC Palliat Care. 2023; 22(1):41.

PMID: 37055737 PMC: 10099695. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01161-0.


Evidence-guided approach to portfolio-guided teaching and assessing communications, ethics and professionalism for medical students and physicians: a systematic scoping review.

Ting J, Phua G, Hong D, Lam B, Lim A, Chong E BMJ Open. 2023; 13(3):e067048.

PMID: 36977542 PMC: 10069516. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067048.


References
1.
Cherfi Y, Szanto K . Student portfolios: not just a tick-box exercise. Clin Teach. 2018; 16(6):641-642. DOI: 10.1111/tct.12974. View

2.
Oudkerk Pool A, Jaarsma A, Driessen E, Govaerts M . Student perspectives on competency-based portfolios: Does a portfolio reflect their competence development?. Perspect Med Educ. 2020; 9(3):166-172. PMC: 7283408. DOI: 10.1007/s40037-020-00571-7. View

3.
Haffling A, Beckman A, Pahlmblad A, Edgren G . Students' reflections in a portfolio pilot: highlighting professional issues. Med Teach. 2010; 32(12):e532-40. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.509420. View

4.
Pham M, Rajic A, Greig J, Sargeant J, Papadopoulos A, McEwen S . A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2015; 5(4):371-85. PMC: 4491356. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1123. View

5.
van Tartwijk J, Driessen E . Portfolios for assessment and learning: AMEE Guide no. 45. Med Teach. 2009; 31(9):790-801. DOI: 10.1080/01421590903139201. View