» Articles » PMID: 35266962

Mapping Spatial Frequency Preferences Across Human Primary Visual Cortex

Overview
Journal J Vis
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2022 Mar 10
PMID 35266962
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neurons in primate visual cortex (area V1) are tuned for spatial frequency, in a manner that depends on their position in the visual field. Several studies have examined this dependency using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), reporting preferred spatial frequencies (tuning curve peaks) of V1 voxels as a function of eccentricity, but their results differ by as much as two octaves, presumably owing to differences in stimuli, measurements, and analysis methodology. Here, we characterize spatial frequency tuning at a millimeter resolution within the human primary visual cortex, across stimulus orientation and visual field locations. We measured fMRI responses to a novel set of stimuli, constructed as sinusoidal gratings in log-polar coordinates, which include circular, radial, and spiral geometries. For each individual stimulus, the local spatial frequency varies inversely with eccentricity, and for any given location in the visual field, the full set of stimuli span a broad range of spatial frequencies and orientations. Over the measured range of eccentricities, the preferred spatial frequency is well-fit by a function that varies as the inverse of the eccentricity plus a small constant. We also find small but systematic effects of local stimulus orientation, defined in both absolute coordinates and relative to visual field location. Specifically, peak spatial frequency is higher for pinwheel than annular stimuli and for horizontal than vertical stimuli.

Citing Articles

Spatial Frequency Maps in Human Visual Cortex: A Replication and Extension.

Ha J, Broderick W, Kay K, Winawer J bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39896600 PMC: 11785079. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.21.634150.


Color and Spatial Frequency Provide Functional Signatures of Retinotopic Visual Areas.

Loggia S, Duffield S, Braunlich K, Conway B J Neurosci. 2024; 45(2.

PMID: 39496489 PMC: 11714348. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1673-23.2024.


Consequences of eye movements for spatial selectivity.

Intoy J, Li Y, Bowers N, Victor J, Poletti M, Rucci M Curr Biol. 2024; 34(14):3265-3272.e4.

PMID: 38981478 PMC: 11348862. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.06.016.


Convolutional neural networks develop major organizational principles of early visual cortex when enhanced with retinal sampling.

da Costa D, Kornemann L, Goebel R, Senden M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):8980.

PMID: 38637554 PMC: 11026486. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59376-x.


Auditory and Visual Gratings Elicit Distinct Gamma Responses.

Gulati D, Ray S eNeuro. 2024; 11(4).

PMID: 38604776 PMC: 11046261. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0116-24.2024.


References
1.
Freeman J, Simoncelli E . Metamers of the ventral stream. Nat Neurosci. 2011; 14(9):1195-201. PMC: 3164938. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2889. View

2.
Hermes D, Petridou N, Kay K, Winawer J . An image-computable model for the stimulus selectivity of gamma oscillations. Elife. 2019; 8. PMC: 6839904. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.47035. View

3.
Peirce J, Gray J, Simpson S, Macaskill M, Hochenberger R, Sogo H . PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behav Res Methods. 2019; 51(1):195-203. PMC: 6420413. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y. View

4.
Gorgolewski K, Burns C, Madison C, Clark D, Halchenko Y, Waskom M . Nipype: a flexible, lightweight and extensible neuroimaging data processing framework in python. Front Neuroinform. 2011; 5:13. PMC: 3159964. DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2011.00013. View

5.
Wandell B, Winawer J . Computational neuroimaging and population receptive fields. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015; 19(6):349-57. PMC: 4484758. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.03.009. View