» Articles » PMID: 35187027

A Semi-quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire Has Relative Validity to Identify Groups of NOVA Food Classification System Among Mexican Adults

Overview
Journal Front Nutr
Date 2022 Feb 21
PMID 35187027
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Ultra-processed foods are recognized as indicators of an unhealthy diet in epidemiological studies. In addition to ultra-processed foods, the NOVA food classification system identifies three other groups with less processing. Unprocessed foods that, together with minimally processed foods (MPF), make NOVA group 1, NOVA group 2 is processed culinary ingredients, and NOVA group 3 is processed foods.

Objective: To assess the relative validity of the semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (SFFQ) to estimate the energy intake for each group NOVA classification system by comparing it with two 24 h-dietary-recall (24DRs) Mexican adults.

Methods: We analyzed dietary information from 226 adults included <60 and ≥60 years with complete SFFQ and two 24DRs from the National Health and Nutrition Survey 2012. We reported mean differences, Spearman correlation coefficients, intra-class correlations coefficients, Bland-Altman plots, and weighted kappa between measures.

Results: The percentage energy intake from unprocessed and minimally processed foods group, Spearman correlation coefficients was 0.54 in adults <60 years and 0.42 in adults ≥60 years, while ultra-processed foods group was 0.67 and 0.48, respectively. The intra-class correlation coefficients in the unprocessed and minimally processed foods group was 0.51 in adults <60 years and 0.46 in adults ≥60 years, and for the ultra-processed foods group were 0.71 and 0.50, respectively. Bland-Altman plots indicated reasonably consistent agreement for unprocessed and minimally processed foods group and ultra-processed foods group in adults <60 years and adults in the ≥60 age group. Weighted kappa was 0.45 in the ultra-processed foods group to adults <60 years and was 0.36-≥60 years.

Conclusion: The SFFQ had acceptable validity to rank the percentage of energy intake from unprocessed and minimally processed foods group and ultra-processed foods group in Mexican adults, both in adults under 60 years and who were 60 years old or older.

Citing Articles

Expected benefits of increasing taxes to nonessential energy-dense foods in Mexico: a modeling study.

Junquera-Badilla I, Basto-Abreu A, Reyes-Garcia A, Colchero M, Barrientos-Gutierrez T BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):624.

PMID: 39953471 PMC: 11829337. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21745-0.


Gut Microbiota: Association with Fiber Intake, Ultra-Processed Food Consumption, Sex, Body Mass Index, and Socioeconomic Status in Medical Students.

Moreno-Altamirano L, Robles-Rivera K, Castelan-Sanchez H, Vaca-Paniagua F, Inarritu Perez M, Hernandez-Valencia S Nutrients. 2024; 16(23).

PMID: 39683634 PMC: 11644225. DOI: 10.3390/nu16234241.


Ultra-processed foods and cardiovascular disease: analysis of three large US prospective cohorts and a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Mendoza K, Smith-Warner S, Rossato S, Khandpur N, Manson J, Qi L Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024; 37:100859.

PMID: 39286398 PMC: 11403639. DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100859.


Ultra-processed Food and Obesity: What Is the Evidence?.

Dicken S, Batterham R Curr Nutr Rep. 2024; 13(1):23-38.

PMID: 38294671 PMC: 10924027. DOI: 10.1007/s13668-024-00517-z.


Who consumes ultra-processed food? A systematic review of sociodemographic determinants of ultra-processed food consumption from nationally representative samples.

Dicken S, Qamar S, Batterham R Nutr Res Rev. 2023; 37(2):416-456.

PMID: 37905428 PMC: 7617046. DOI: 10.1017/S0954422423000240.


References
1.
Denova-Gutierrez E, Ramirez-Silva I, Rodriguez-Ramirez S, Jimenez-Aguilar A, Shamah-Levy T, Rivera-Dommarco J . Validity of a food frequency questionnaire to assess food intake in Mexican adolescent and adult population. Salud Publica Mex. 2017; 58(6):617-628. DOI: 10.21149/spm.v58i6.7862. View

2.
Hall K, Ayuketah A, Brychta R, Cai H, Cassimatis T, Chen K . Ultra-Processed Diets Cause Excess Calorie Intake and Weight Gain: An Inpatient Randomized Controlled Trial of Ad Libitum Food Intake. Cell Metab. 2019; 30(1):67-77.e3. PMC: 7946062. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.008. View

3.
Morales Ruan M, Valenzuela Bravo D, Jimenez Aguilar A, Cuevas Nasu L, Mendez Gomez Humaran I, Shamah Levy T . [Dietary diversity in women who live in food insecurity settings in Mexico, beneficiaries of a food support program]. Nutr Hosp. 2018; 35(2):408-415. DOI: 10.20960/nh.1620. View

4.
Moubarac J, Batal M, Louzada M, Martinez Steele E, Monteiro C . Consumption of ultra-processed foods predicts diet quality in Canada. Appetite. 2016; 108:512-520. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.006. View

5.
Oviedo-Solis C, Monterrubio-Flores E, Cediel G, Denova-Gutierrez E, Barquera S . Relative Validity of a Semi-Quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire to Estimate Dietary Intake According to the NOVA Classification in Mexican Children and Adolescents. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021; 122(6):1129-1140. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.11.002. View