» Articles » PMID: 35177617

Genome-wide Functional Screens Enable the Prediction of High Activity CRISPR-Cas9 and -Cas12a Guides in Yarrowia Lipolytica

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Feb 18
PMID 35177617
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genome-wide functional genetic screens have been successful in discovering genotype-phenotype relationships and in engineering new phenotypes. While broadly applied in mammalian cell lines and in E. coli, use in non-conventional microorganisms has been limited, in part, due to the inability to accurately design high activity CRISPR guides in such species. Here, we develop an experimental-computational approach to sgRNA design that is specific to an organism of choice, in this case the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. A negative selection screen in the absence of non-homologous end-joining, the dominant DNA repair mechanism, was used to generate single guide RNA (sgRNA) activity profiles for both SpCas9 and LbCas12a. This genome-wide data served as input to a deep learning algorithm, DeepGuide, that is able to accurately predict guide activity. DeepGuide uses unsupervised learning to obtain a compressed representation of the genome, followed by supervised learning to map sgRNA sequence, genomic context, and epigenetic features with guide activity. Experimental validation, both genome-wide and with a subset of selected genes, confirms DeepGuide's ability to accurately predict high activity sgRNAs. DeepGuide provides an organism specific predictor of CRISPR guide activity that with retraining could be applied to other fungal species, prokaryotes, and other non-conventional organisms.

Citing Articles

Balanced Training Sets Improve Deep Learning-Based Prediction of CRISPR sgRNA Activity.

Trivedi V, Mohseni A, Lonardi S, Wheeldon I ACS Synth Biol. 2024; 13(11):3774-3781.

PMID: 39495623 PMC: 11574921. DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.4c00542.


The Evolution of Nucleic Acid-Based Diagnosis Methods from the (pre-)CRISPR to CRISPR era and the Associated Machine/Deep Learning Approaches in Relevant RNA Design.

Chakraborty S, Ray Dutta J, Ganesan R, Minary P Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2847:241-300.

PMID: 39312149 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4079-1_17.


Optimizing multicopy chromosomal integration for stable high-performing strains.

Du F, Li Z, Li X, Zhang D, Zhang F, Zhang Z Nat Chem Biol. 2024; 20(12):1670-1679.

PMID: 38858530 DOI: 10.1038/s41589-024-01650-0.


Multiplex CRISPR-Cas Genome Editing: Next-Generation Microbial Strain Engineering.

Lim S, Lee S J Agric Food Chem. 2024; 72(21):11871-11884.

PMID: 38744727 PMC: 11141556. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c01650.


Comparison of CRISPR-MAD7 and CRISPR-Cas9 for Gene Disruptions in .

Smirnov K, Weiss F, Hatzl A, Rieder L, Olesen K, Jensen S J Fungi (Basel). 2024; 10(3).

PMID: 38535206 PMC: 10971144. DOI: 10.3390/jof10030197.


References
1.
Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna J, Charpentier E . A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012; 337(6096):816-21. PMC: 6286148. DOI: 10.1126/science.1225829. View

2.
Zetsche B, Gootenberg J, Abudayyeh O, Slaymaker I, Makarova K, Essletzbichler P . Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell. 2015; 163(3):759-71. PMC: 4638220. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038. View

3.
Sadhu M, Bloom J, Day L, Siegel J, Kosuri S, Kruglyak L . Highly parallel genome variant engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Genet. 2018; 50(4):510-514. PMC: 6115196. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-018-0087-y. View

4.
Cong L, Ran F, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N . Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 2013; 339(6121):819-23. PMC: 3795411. DOI: 10.1126/science.1231143. View

5.
Gilbert L, Horlbeck M, Adamson B, Villalta J, Chen Y, Whitehead E . Genome-Scale CRISPR-Mediated Control of Gene Repression and Activation. Cell. 2014; 159(3):647-61. PMC: 4253859. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.029. View