Intermittent ERK Oscillations Downstream of FGF in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells

Overview

Journal Development

Specialty Biology

Date 2022 Feb 17

PMID 35175328

Authors

Dhruv Raina

Fiorella Fabris

Luis G Morelli

Christian Schroter

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Signal transduction networks generate characteristic dynamic activities to process extracellular signals and guide cell fate decisions such as to divide or differentiate. The differentiation of pluripotent cells is controlled by FGF/ERK signaling. However, only a few studies have addressed the dynamic activity of the FGF/ERK signaling network in pluripotent cells at high time resolution. Here, we use live cell sensors in wild-type and Fgf4-mutant mouse embryonic stem cells to measure dynamic ERK activity in single cells, for defined ligand concentrations and differentiation states. These sensors reveal pulses of ERK activity. Pulsing patterns are heterogeneous between individual cells. Consecutive pulse sequences occur more frequently than expected from simple stochastic models. Sequences become more prevalent with higher ligand concentration, but are rarer in more differentiated cells. Our results suggest that FGF/ERK signaling operates in the vicinity of a transition point between oscillatory and non-oscillatory dynamics in embryonic stem cells. The resulting heterogeneous dynamic signaling activities add a new dimension to cellular heterogeneity that may be linked to divergent fate decisions in stem cell cultures.

Citing Articles

AI-powered simulation-based inference of a genuinely spatial-stochastic gene regulation model of early mouse embryogenesis.

Ramirez Sierra M, Sokolowski T PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(11):e1012473.

PMID: 39541410 PMC: 11614244. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012473.

Transient frequency preference responses in cell signaling systems.

Szischik C, Reves Szemere J, Balderrama R, Sanchez de la Vega C, Ventura A NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2024; 10(1):86.

PMID: 39128915 PMC: 11317535. DOI: 10.1038/s41540-024-00413-w.

The physiological and pathological mechanisms of early embryonic development.

Mu J, Zhou Z, Sang Q, Wang L Fundam Res. 2024; 2(6):859-872.

PMID: 38933386 PMC: 11197659. DOI: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.08.011.

Tonic ErbB signaling underlies TGFβ-induced activation of ERK and is required for lens cell epithelial to myofibroblast transition.

VanSlyke J, Boswell B, Musil L Mol Biol Cell. 2024; 35(3):ar35.

PMID: 38170570 PMC: 10916858. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E23-07-0294.

Antigen perception in T cells by long-term Erk and NFAT signaling dynamics.

Wither M, White W, Pendyala S, Leanza P, Fowler D, Kueh H Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(52):e2308366120.

PMID: 38113261 PMC: 10756264. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2308366120.

References

Tinevez J, Perry N, Schindelin J, Hoopes G, Reynolds G, Laplantine E . TrackMate: An open and extensible platform for single-particle tracking. Methods. 2016; 115:80-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.016. View

Aoki K, Kumagai Y, Sakurai A, Komatsu N, Fujita Y, Shionyu C . Stochastic ERK activation induced by noise and cell-to-cell propagation regulates cell density-dependent proliferation. Mol Cell. 2013; 52(4):529-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.09.015. View

Hiratsuka T, Fujita Y, Naoki H, Aoki K, Kamioka Y, Matsuda M . Intercellular propagation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation revealed by in vivo imaging of mouse skin. Elife. 2015; 4:e05178. PMC: 4337632. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.05178. View

Deathridge J, Antolovic V, Parsons M, Chubb J . Live imaging of ERK signalling dynamics in differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells. Development. 2019; 146(12). PMC: 6602347. DOI: 10.1242/dev.172940. View

Sturm O, Orton R, Grindlay J, Birtwistle M, Vyshemirsky V, Gilbert D . The mammalian MAPK/ERK pathway exhibits properties of a negative feedback amplifier. Sci Signal. 2010; 3(153):ra90. DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2001212. View

Harris C, Millman K, van der Walt S, Gommers R, Virtanen P, Cournapeau D . Array programming with NumPy. Nature. 2020; 585(7825):357-362. PMC: 7759461. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2. View

Raina D, Bahadori A, Stanoev A, Protzek M, Koseska A, Schroter C . Cell-cell communication through FGF4 generates and maintains robust proportions of differentiated cell types in embryonic stem cells. Development. 2021; 148(21). PMC: 8602943. DOI: 10.1242/dev.199926. View

Guo G, Yang J, Nichols J, Hall J, Eyres I, Mansfield W . Klf4 reverts developmentally programmed restriction of ground state pluripotency. Development. 2009; 136(7):1063-9. PMC: 2685927. DOI: 10.1242/dev.030957. View

de la Cova C, Townley R, Regot S, Greenwald I . A Real-Time Biosensor for ERK Activity Reveals Signaling Dynamics during C. elegans Cell Fate Specification. Dev Cell. 2017; 42(5):542-553.e4. PMC: 5595649. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.07.014. View

10.

Molotkov A, Mazot P, Brewer J, Cinalli R, Soriano P . Distinct Requirements for FGFR1 and FGFR2 in Primitive Endoderm Development and Exit from Pluripotency. Dev Cell. 2017; 41(5):511-526.e4. PMC: 5502766. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.05.004. View

11.

Kalkan T, Olova N, Roode M, Mulas C, Lee H, Nett I . Tracking the embryonic stem cell transition from ground state pluripotency. Development. 2017; 144(7):1221-1234. PMC: 5399622. DOI: 10.1242/dev.142711. View

12.

Rueden C, Schindelin J, Hiner M, DeZonia B, Walter A, Arena E . ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017; 18(1):529. PMC: 5708080. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z. View

13.

Sumi T, Oki S, Kitajima K, Meno C . Epiblast ground state is controlled by canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling in the postimplantation mouse embryo and epiblast stem cells. PLoS One. 2013; 8(5):e63378. PMC: 3653965. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063378. View

14.

Webb A, Lengyel I, Jorg D, Valentin G, Julicher F, Morelli L . Persistence, period and precision of autonomous cellular oscillators from the zebrafish segmentation clock. Elife. 2016; 5. PMC: 4803185. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.08438. View

15.

Sparta B, Pargett M, Minguet M, Distor K, Bell G, Albeck J . Receptor Level Mechanisms Are Required for Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF)-stimulated Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase (ERK) Activity Pulses. J Biol Chem. 2015; 290(41):24784-92. PMC: 4598990. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M115.662247. View

16.

Santos S, Verveer P, Bastiaens P . Growth factor-induced MAPK network topology shapes Erk response determining PC-12 cell fate. Nat Cell Biol. 2007; 9(3):324-30. DOI: 10.1038/ncb1543. View

17.

Singh A, Hamazaki T, Hankowski K, Terada N . A heterogeneous expression pattern for Nanog in embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2007; 25(10):2534-42. DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0126. View

18.

Eguiluz V, Ospeck M, Choe Y, Hudspeth A, Magnasco M . Essential nonlinearities in hearing. Phys Rev Lett. 2000; 84(22):5232-5. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5232. View

19.

Camalet S, Duke T, Julicher F, Prost J . Auditory sensitivity provided by self-tuned critical oscillations of hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(7):3183-8. PMC: 16213. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.7.3183. View

20.

Shankaran H, Ippolito D, Chrisler W, Resat H, Bollinger N, Opresko L . Rapid and sustained nuclear-cytoplasmic ERK oscillations induced by epidermal growth factor. Mol Syst Biol. 2009; 5:332. PMC: 2824491. DOI: 10.1038/msb.2009.90. View