» Articles » PMID: 35172335

Is Sex As a Biological Variable Still Being Ignored in Preclinical Aging Research?

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2022 Feb 16
PMID 35172335
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Five years ago, the National Institute of Health (NIH) introduced a mandate to revolutionize the way sex as a biological variable (SABV) is considered in NIH-funded preclinical research. Given the known effects of sex on aging physiology, pathology, treatment response, and the effectiveness of interventions it is particularly important that SABV be considered in basic biology of aging research. Five years after this mandate, a significant amount of published work funded by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) is still not including mice of both sexes and/or not considering sex differences or comparisons in preclinical studies. Here we review a cross-section of recently published NIA-funded research to determine adherence to this mandate. We discuss the state of the preclinical aging field in terms of SABV and suggest strategies for improving adherence to the NIH mandate. It is imperative that we consider SABV and include males and females in all aspects of aging biology research to improve health outcomes for all.

Citing Articles

Recommendations for the Application of Sex and Gender Medicine in Preclinical, Epidemiological and Clinical Research.

Cattaneo A, Bellenghi M, Ferroni E, Mangia C, Marconi M, Rizza P J Pers Med. 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39338162 PMC: 11433203. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14090908.


Female aging: when translational models don't translate.

Gilmer G, Hettinger Z, Tuakli-Wosornu Y, Skidmore E, Silver J, Thurston R Nat Aging. 2023; 3(12):1500-1508.

PMID: 38052933 PMC: 11099540. DOI: 10.1038/s43587-023-00509-8.


Optimizing preclinical models of ageing for translation to clinical trials.

Mitchell S, MacArthur M, Kane A Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023; 91(1):5-7.

PMID: 37675638 PMC: 11671336. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15902.


Sex differences in pharmacological interventions and their effects on lifespan and healthspan outcomes: a systematic review.

Knufinke M, MacArthur M, Ewald C, Mitchell S Front Aging. 2023; 4:1172789.

PMID: 37305228 PMC: 10249017. DOI: 10.3389/fragi.2023.1172789.


Disciplinary Roots of 300 Top-Ranked Scientific Contributors to Gerontology: From Legacy to Enriching Our Discovery.

Ferraro K J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022; 77(11):2149-2154.

PMID: 36409829 PMC: 9678198. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glac129.

References
1.
Mitchell S, Madrigal-Matute J, Scheibye-Knudsen M, Fang E, Aon M, Gonzalez-Reyes J . Effects of Sex, Strain, and Energy Intake on Hallmarks of Aging in Mice. Cell Metab. 2016; 23(6):1093-1112. PMC: 4911707. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.027. View

2.
Sampathkumar N, Bravo J, Chen Y, Danthi P, Donahue E, Lai R . Widespread sex dimorphism in aging and age-related diseases. Hum Genet. 2019; 139(3):333-356. PMC: 7031050. DOI: 10.1007/s00439-019-02082-w. View

3.
Harrison D, Strong R, Allison D, Ames B, Astle C, Atamna H . Acarbose, 17-α-estradiol, and nordihydroguaiaretic acid extend mouse lifespan preferentially in males. Aging Cell. 2013; 13(2):273-82. PMC: 3954939. DOI: 10.1111/acel.12170. View

4.
Rubinow D, Moore M . Sex-dependent modulation of treatment response. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2011; 6(1):39-51. PMC: 3181787. View

5.
. Accounting for sex and gender makes for better science. Nature. 2020; 588(7837):196. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-020-03459-y. View