Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Geometric Model

Overview

Journal Proc Inst Mech Eng H

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2022 Feb 11

PMID 35147063

Authors

Gregory M Pryce

Bismaya Sabu

Mazen Al-Hajjar

Ruth K Wilcox

Jonathan Thompson

Graham H Isaac

Tim Board

Sophie Williams

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most common and successful surgical interventions. The survivorship at 10 years for the most commonly used systems is over 95%. However, the incidence of revision is usually much higher in the 0-1 year time period following the intervention. The most common reason for revision in this early time period is dislocation and subluxation, which may be defined as complete or permanent, and partial or temporary loss of contact between the bearing surfaces respectively. This study comprises the development of a geometric model of bone and an in situ total hip replacement, to predict the occurrence and location of bone and component impingement for a wide range of acetabular cup positions and for a series of frequently practiced activities of daily living. The model developed predicts that anterior-superior component impingement is associated with activities that result in posterior dislocation. The incidence may be reduced by increased cup anteversion and inclination. Posterior-inferior component impingement is associated with anterior dislocation activities. Its incidence may be reduced by decreased cup anteversion and inclination. A component impingement-free range was identified, running from when the cup was positioned with 45° inclination and 25° anteversion to 70° inclination and 15°-20° anteversion.

Citing Articles

Is it feasible to develop a supervised learning algorithm incorporating spinopelvic mobility to predict impingement in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty?.

Fontalis A, Zhao B, Putzeys P, Mancino F, Zhang S, Vanspauwen T Bone Jt Open. 2024; 5(8):671-680.

PMID: 39139101 PMC: 11322786. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.58.BJO-2024-0020.R1.

Phantom validation of a novel RSA-based impingement metric to assess component-on-component impingement risk.

Taleb S, Broberg J, Lanting B, Teeter M Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2024; 238(5):483-487.

PMID: 38519832 PMC: 11083746. DOI: 10.1177/09544119241238950.

Is It Necessary to Obtain Lateral Pelvic Radiographs in Flexed Seated Position for Preoperative Total Hip Arthroplasty Planning?.

Eslam Pour A, Green J, Christensen T, Muthusamy N, Schwarzkopf R Arthroplast Today. 2023; 21:101133.

PMID: 37234599 PMC: 10206860. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101133.

Moving fluoroscopy-based analysis of THA kinematics during unrestricted activities of daily living.

DIsidoro F, Brockmann C, Friesenbichler B, Zumbrunn T, Leunig M, Ferguson S Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1095845.

PMID: 37168610 PMC: 10164959. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1095845.

A novel method for evaluating combined component anteversion in total hip arthroplasty on cross-table lateral hip radiographs.

Dimitriou D, Zindel C, Winkler E, Cornaz F, Mazel P, Zingg P Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023; 143(9):5977-5984.

PMID: 36899142 PMC: 10449991. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04825-x.

References

Kurtz W, M Ecker T, Reichmann W, Murphy S . Factors affecting bony impingement in hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 25(4):624-34.e1-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.03.024. View

Barrack R, Schmalzried T . Impingement and rim wear associated with early osteolysis after a total hip replacement : a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84(7):1218-20. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200207000-00021. View

Barrack R . Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003; 11(2):89-99. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200303000-00003. View

Yamaguchi M, Akisue T, Bauer T, Hashimoto Y . The spatial location of impingement in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15(3):305-13. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(00)90601-6. View

Al-Hajjar M, Leslie I, Tipper J, Williams S, Fisher J, Jennings L . Effect of cup inclination angle during microseparation and rim loading on the wear of BIOLOX® delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010; 95(2):263-8. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31708. View

MCCOLLUM D, Gray W . Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; (261):159-70. View

Danoff J, Bobman J, Cunn G, Murtaugh T, Gorroochurn P, Geller J . Redefining the Acetabular Component Safe Zone for Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015; 31(2):506-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.010. View

Padgett D, Lipman J, Robie B, Nestor B . Influence of total hip design on dislocation: a computer model and clinical analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 447:48-52. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218748.30236.40. View

Hua X, Li J, Wilcox R, Fisher J, Jones A . Geometric parameterisation of pelvic bone and cartilage in contact analysis of the natural hip: an initial study. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2015; 229(8):570-80. PMC: 4620590. DOI: 10.1177/0954411915592656. View

10.

Stroh D, Issa K, Johnson A, Delanois R, Mont M . Reduced dislocation rates and excellent functional outcomes with large-diameter femoral heads. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(8):1415-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.11.017. View

11.

Sariali E, Stewart T, Jin Z, Fisher J . Effect of cup abduction angle and head lateral microseparation on contact stresses in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J Biomech. 2011; 45(2):390-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.10.033. View

12.

Ezquerra L, Quilez M, Perez M, Albareda J, Seral B . Range of Movement for Impingement and Dislocation Avoidance in Total Hip Replacement Predicted by Finite Element Model. J Med Biol Eng. 2017; 37(1):26-34. PMC: 5325855. DOI: 10.1007/s40846-016-0210-4. View

13.

Widmer K, Majewski M . The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2005; 20(7):723-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.04.003. View

14.

Pedersen D, Callaghan J, Brown T . Activity-dependence of the "safe zone" for impingement versus dislocation avoidance. Med Eng Phys. 2005; 27(4):323-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.09.004. View

15.

Usrey M, Noble P, Rudner L, Conditt M, Birman M, Santore R . Does neck/liner impingement increase wear of ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene liners?. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21(6 Suppl 2):65-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.05.013. View

16.

Brown T, Elkins J, Pedersen D, Callaghan J . Impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty: mechanisms and consequences. Iowa Orthop J. 2014; 34:1-15. PMC: 4127709. View

17.

Nishihara S, Sugano N, Nishii T, Ohzono K, Yoshikawa H . Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using three-dimensional computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (411):140-51. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000069891.31220.fd. View

18.

Sultan P, Tan V, Lai M, Garino J . Independent contribution of elevated-rim acetabular liner and femoral head size to the stability of total hip implants. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17(3):289-92. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.30415. View

19.

Widmer K, Grutzner P . Joint replacement-total hip replacement with CT-based navigation. Injury. 2004; 35 Suppl 1:S-A84-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.05.015. View

20.

Nadzadi M, Pedersen D, Yack H, Callaghan J, Brown T . Kinematics, kinetics, and finite element analysis of commonplace maneuvers at risk for total hip dislocation. J Biomech. 2003; 36(4):577-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00232-4. View