» Articles » PMID: 39139101

Is It Feasible to Develop a Supervised Learning Algorithm Incorporating Spinopelvic Mobility to Predict Impingement in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Overview
Journal Bone Jt Open
Date 2024 Aug 14
PMID 39139101
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Precise implant positioning, tailored to individual spinopelvic biomechanics and phenotype, is paramount for stability in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite a few studies on instability prediction, there is a notable gap in research utilizing artificial intelligence (AI). The objective of our pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of developing an AI algorithm tailored to individual spinopelvic mechanics and patient phenotype for predicting impingement.

Methods: This international, multicentre prospective cohort study across two centres encompassed 157 adults undergoing primary robotic arm-assisted THA. Impingement during specific flexion and extension stances was identified using the virtual range of motion (ROM) tool of the robotic software. The primary AI model, the Light Gradient-Boosting Machine (LGBM), used tabular data to predict impingement presence, direction (flexion or extension), and type. A secondary model integrating tabular data with plain anteroposterior pelvis radiographs was evaluated to assess for any potential enhancement in prediction accuracy.

Results: We identified nine predictors from an analysis of baseline spinopelvic characteristics and surgical planning parameters. Using fivefold cross-validation, the LGBM achieved 70.2% impingement prediction accuracy. With impingement data, the LGBM estimated direction with 85% accuracy, while the support vector machine (SVM) determined impingement type with 72.9% accuracy. After integrating imaging data with a multilayer perceptron (tabular) and a convolutional neural network (radiograph), the LGBM's prediction was 68.1%. Both combined and LGBM-only had similar impingement direction prediction rates (around 84.5%).

Conclusion: This study is a pioneering effort in leveraging AI for impingement prediction in THA, utilizing a comprehensive, real-world clinical dataset. Our machine-learning algorithm demonstrated promising accuracy in predicting impingement, its type, and direction. While the addition of imaging data to our deep-learning algorithm did not boost accuracy, the potential for refined annotations, such as landmark markings, offers avenues for future enhancement. Prior to clinical integration, external validation and larger-scale testing of this algorithm are essential.

Citing Articles

Impact of CT-based navigation, large femoral head, and dual-mobility liner on achieving the required range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.

Konishi T, Hamai S, Kawahara S, Hara D, Sato T, Motomura G Bone Jt Open. 2025; 6(2):155-163.

PMID: 39919725 PMC: 11805587. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.62.BJO-2024-0084.R1.

References
1.
Dhawan R, Bare J, Shimmin A . Modular dual-mobility articulations in patients with adverse spinopelvic mobility. Bone Joint J. 2022; 104-B(7):820-825. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B7.BJJ-2021-1628.R1. View

2.
Vigdorchik J, Sharma A, Elbuluk A, Carroll K, Mayman D, Lieberman J . High Offset Stems Are Protective of Dislocation in High-Risk Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020; 36(1):210-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.016. View

3.
Innmann M, Merle C, Phan P, Beaule P, Grammatopoulos G . Differences in Spinopelvic Characteristics Between Hip Osteoarthritis Patients and Controls. J Arthroplasty. 2021; 36(8):2808-2816. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.031. View

4.
Chandler D, Glousman R, Hull D, McGuire P, Kim I, Clarke I . Prosthetic hip range of motion and impingement. The effects of head and neck geometry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982; (166):284-91. View

5.
Innmann M, Merle C, Gotterbarm T, Ewerbeck V, Beaule P, Grammatopoulos G . Can spinopelvic mobility be predicted in patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty? A prospective, diagnostic study of patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis. Bone Joint J. 2019; 101-B(8):902-909. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B8.BJJ-2019-0106.R1. View