Between the Convention and Conventional Practice: Israeli Social Workers' Recommendations Regarding the Legal Capacity of People with Disabilities

Overview

Journal J Appl Res Intellect Disabil

Date 2022 Feb 11

PMID 35146852

Authors

Roni Holler

Shirli Werner

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Following the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (CRPD), various countries have recently amended their legal capacity laws with the aim of restricting the use of guardianship and increasing the use of other, less restrictive practices, mainly supported decision making. As social workers have a key role in carrying out these reforms, this study examines how Israeli social workers make legal capacity-related decisions.

Method: Semi-structured interviews with 27 Israeli social workers.

Results: Thematic analysis identified three factors driving social workers' recommendations regarding guardianship and supported decision-making: the person's diagnosis and functioning level, and the presence of a supportive family. A fourth factor, the person's preferences, played a complex and more limited role.

Conclusions: Many changes have yet to be made to fully apply the support paradigm in Israel, since social workers still tend to base their recommendations on factors not fully aligned with the CRPD.

Citing Articles

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Social Work: Evidence for Impact?.

McCusker P, Gillespie L, Davidson G, Vicary S, Stone K Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(20).

PMID: 37887665 PMC: 10606596. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20206927.

Between the convention and conventional practice: Israeli social workers' recommendations regarding the legal capacity of people with disabilities.

Holler R, Werner S J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2022; 35(3):826-833.

PMID: 35146852 PMC: 9305968. DOI: 10.1111/jar.12986.

References

Rogers E, Pilch M, McGuire B, Flynn E, Egan J . Psychologists' perspectives on supported decision making in Ireland. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2020; 64(3):234-245. DOI: 10.1111/jir.12712. View

Werner S, Holler R . Israeli social workers' recommendations on guardianship and supported decision-making: Examination of client and social worker factors. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2021; 92(1):109-120. DOI: 10.1037/ort0000594. View

Holler R, Werner S . Between the convention and conventional practice: Israeli social workers' recommendations regarding the legal capacity of people with disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2022; 35(3):826-833. PMC: 9305968. DOI: 10.1111/jar.12986. View

Dowling S, Williams V, Webb J, Gall M, Worrall D . Managing relational autonomy in interactions: People with intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019; 32(5):1058-1066. PMC: 6850626. DOI: 10.1111/jar.12595. View

Weiss-Gal I . The person-in-environment approach: professional ideology and practice of social workers in Israel. Soc Work. 2008; 53(1):65-75. DOI: 10.1093/sw/53.1.65. View

Wehmeyer M, Bolding N . Enhanced self-determination of adults with intellectual disability as an outcome of moving to community-based work or living environments. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2001; 45(Pt 5):371-83. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2001.00342.x. View

Jayes M, Palmer R, Enderby P, Sutton A . How do health and social care professionals in England and Wales assess mental capacity? A literature review. Disabil Rehabil. 2019; 42(19):2797-2808. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1572793. View

Muller S . [The influence of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on the German jurisdiction and legalisation regarding compulsory measures]. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2018; 86(8):485-492. DOI: 10.1055/a-0597-2031. View

Dukes E, McGuire B . Enhancing capacity to make sexuality-related decisions in people with an intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009; 53(8):727-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01186.x. View

10.

Ganzini L, Volicer L, Nelson W, Fox E, Derse A . Ten myths about decision-making capacity. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2005; 6(3 Suppl):S100-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.03.021. View

11.

Doron I . Aging in the shadow of the law: the case of elder guardianship in Israel. J Aging Soc Policy. 2005; 16(4):59-77. DOI: 10.1300/J031v16n04_04. View

12.

Series L . Relationships, autonomy and legal capacity: Mental capacity and support paradigms. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2015; 40:80-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.04.010. View

13.

Watson J, Anderson J, Wilson E, Anderson K . The impact of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) on Victorian guardianship practice. Disabil Rehabil. 2020; 44(12):2806-2814. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1836680. View

14.

Marishet M . Legal capacity of persons with disabilities in Ethiopia: The need to reform existing legal frameworks. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2017; 55:8-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.10.001. View

15.

Watson J, Wilson E, Hagiliassis N . Supporting end of life decision making: Case studies of relational closeness in supported decision making for people with severe or profound intellectual disability. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2017; 30(6):1022-1034. DOI: 10.1111/jar.12393. View

16.

McSwiggan S, Meares S, Porter M . Decision-making capacity evaluation in adult guardianship: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2015; 28(3):373-84. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610215001490. View

17.

Werner S, Holler R . Attitudes toward guardianship, social work goals, and perspectives of disability among social work students. Disabil Rehabil. 2019; 42(5):712-721. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1508510. View