» Articles » PMID: 18956416

Quantitative 2D and 3D Phase Contrast MRI: Optimized Analysis of Blood Flow and Vessel Wall Parameters

Overview
Journal Magn Reson Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Radiology
Date 2008 Oct 29
PMID 18956416
Citations 219
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Quantification of CINE phase contrast (PC)-MRI data is a challenging task because of the limited spatiotemporal resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The method presented in this work combines B-spline interpolation and Green's theorem to provide optimized quantification of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. The B-spline model provided optimal derivatives of the measured three-directional blood velocities onto the vessel contour, as required for vectorial wall shear stress (WSS) computation. Eight planes distributed along the entire thoracic aorta were evaluated in a 19-volunteer study using both high-spatiotemporal-resolution planar two-dimensional (2D)-CINE-PC ( approximately 1.4 x 1.4 mm(2)/24.4 ms) and lower-resolution 3D-CINE-PC ( approximately 2.8 x 1.6 x 3 mm(3)/48.6 ms) with three-directional velocity encoding. Synthetic data, error propagation, and interindividual, intermodality, and interobserver variability were used to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of the method. While the impact of MR measurement noise was only minor, the limited resolution of PC-MRI introduced systematic WSS underestimations. In vivo data demonstrated close agreement for flow and WSS between 2D- and 3D-CINE-PC as well as observers, and confirmed the reliability of the method. WSS analysis along the aorta revealed the presence of a circumferential WSS component accounting for 10-20%. Initial results in a patient with atherosclerosis suggest the potential of the method for understanding the formation and progression of cardiovascular diseases.

Citing Articles

The influence of post-processing software on quantitative results in 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations.

Trauzeddel R, Muller M, Demir A, Wiesemann S, Daud E, Schmitter S Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1465554.

PMID: 39399512 PMC: 11467864. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1465554.


4D-Flow MRI and Vector Ultrasound in the In-Vitro Evaluation of Surgical Aortic Heart Valves - a Pilot Study.

Stephan H, Grefen L, Clevert D, Onkes M, Ning J, Thierfelder N J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2024; 18(1):158-168.

PMID: 39365396 PMC: 11885334. DOI: 10.1007/s12265-024-10564-0.


Cluster analysis of 100 Marfan patients based on aortic 4D flow MRI and Z-score: insights into disease heterogeneity and stratification of subgroups.

Lenz A, Bahr F, Riedel C, Wright F, Sinn M, Zhang S Eur Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39283357 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11034-6.


Imaging of Carotid Stenosis: Where Are We Standing? Comparison of Multiparametric Ultrasound, CT Angiography, and MRI Angiography, with Recent Developments.

David E, Grazhdani H, Aliotta L, Gavazzi L, Foti P, Palmucci S Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(16).

PMID: 39202195 PMC: 11352936. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14161708.


A comprehensive MRI-based computational model of blood flow in compliant aorta using radial basis function interpolation.

Perinajova R, van de Ven T, Roelse E, Xu F, Juffermans J, Westenberg J Biomed Eng Online. 2024; 23(1):69.

PMID: 39039565 PMC: 11265469. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-024-01251-x.