» Articles » PMID: 35007772

Quantitative Proteomics Using Isobaric Labeling: A Practical Guide

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Jan 10
PMID 35007772
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the past decade, relative proteomic quantification using isobaric labeling technology has developed into a key tool for comparing the expression of proteins in biological samples. Although its multiplexing capacity and flexibility make this a valuable technology for addressing various biological questions, its quantitative accuracy and precision still pose significant challenges to the reliability of its quantification results. Here, we give a detailed overview of the different kinds of isobaric mass tags and the advantages and disadvantages of the isobaric labeling method. We also discuss which precautions should be taken at each step of the isobaric labeling workflow, to obtain reliable quantification results in large-scale quantitative proteomics experiments. In the last section, we discuss the broad applications of the isobaric labeling technology in biological and clinical studies, with an emphasis on thermal proteome profiling and proteogenomics.

Citing Articles

Atroposelective [4+1] annulation for the synthesis of isotopic isoindolinones bearing both central and axial chirality.

Gu J, Zhang L, Zhuang H, He Y Chem Sci. 2025; .

PMID: 40046081 PMC: 11877746. DOI: 10.1039/d5sc00594a.


Quantitative Proteomics and Molecular Mechanisms of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Mice Treated with Incomptine A, Part II.

Garcia-Hernandez N, Calzada F, Bautista E, Sanchez-Lopez J, Valdes M, Hernandez-Caballero M Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025; 18(2).

PMID: 40006055 PMC: 11858899. DOI: 10.3390/ph18020242.


Editorial: Advancements in proteomics and PTMomics: unveiling mechanistic insights and targeted therapies for metabolic diseases.

Chen X, Li Y, Braconi D Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025; 13:1556129.

PMID: 39925740 PMC: 11802801. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1556129.


Exosome: an overview on enhanced biogenesis by small molecules.

Bavafa A, Izadpanahi M, Hosseini E, Hajinejad M, Abedi M, Forouzanfar F Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025; .

PMID: 39862264 DOI: 10.1007/s00210-024-03762-9.


Multidimensional Proteomic Landscape Reveals Distinct Activated Pathways Between Human Brain Tumors.

Yang S, Zheng Y, Zhou C, Yao J, Yan G, Shen C Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 12(7):e2410142.

PMID: 39716938 PMC: 11831486. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202410142.


References
1.
Liang H, Lahert E, Pike I, Ward M . Quantitation of protein post-translational modifications using isobaric tandem mass tags. Bioanalysis. 2015; 7(3):383-400. DOI: 10.4155/bio.14.296. View

2.
Lin W, Hung W, Yian Y, Wu K, Han C, Chen Y . Multi-Q: a fully automated tool for multiplexed protein quantitation. J Proteome Res. 2006; 5(9):2328-38. DOI: 10.1021/pr060132c. View

3.
Christoforou A, Lilley K . Isobaric tagging approaches in quantitative proteomics: the ups and downs. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012; 404(4):1029-37. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-012-6012-9. View

4.
Ren Y, He Y, Lin Z, Zi J, Yang H, Zhang S . Reagents for Isobaric Labeling Peptides in Quantitative Proteomics. Anal Chem. 2018; 90(21):12366-12371. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00321. View

5.
Qu Z, Meng F, Bomgarden R, Viner R, Li J, Rogers J . Proteomic quantification and site-mapping of S-nitrosylated proteins using isobaric iodoTMT reagents. J Proteome Res. 2014; 13(7):3200-11. PMC: 4084841. DOI: 10.1021/pr401179v. View