» Articles » PMID: 34928307

Untoward Effects of Micro- and Nanoplastics: An Expert Review of Their Biological Impact and Epigenetic Effects

Overview
Journal Adv Nutr
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2021 Dec 20
PMID 34928307
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The production of plastic has dramatically increased in the last 50 y. Because of their stability and durability, plastics are ubiquitously incorporated in both marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Plastic is acted upon by biological, chemical, and physical agents, leading to fragmentation into small pieces [i.e., microplastics (MPs) or nanoplastics (NPs)], classified depending on their size. MPs range from 0.1 to 5000 μm and NPs are fragments between 0.001 to 0.1 μm. MPs and, especially NPs, are easily incorporated into living beings via ingestion. The penetration of MPs and NPs into the food system is an important issue, for both food security and health risk assessment. Ingestion of different MPs and NPs has been associated with different issues in the intestine, such as direct physical damage, increased intestinal permeability, diminished microbiota diversity, and increases in local inflammatory response. However, the potential harmful effects of low-dose dietary plastic are still unclear. Some evidence indicates that intestinal uptake of plastic particles is relatively low and is mostly dependent on the particle's size. However, other evidence highlights that NPs dysregulate key molecular signaling pathways, modify the gut microbiota composition, and may induce important epigenetic changes, including transgenerational effects that might be involved in the onset of many different metabolic disorders. Until now, experiments have been mostly performed on marine organisms, Caenorhabditis elegans, and mouse models, but some research indicates accidental plastic dietary consumption by humans, raising the issue of detrimental health effects of MPs and NPs. This review discusses the impact that MPs and NPs could have on the intestinal tract and the biodistribution and systemic, cellular, and molecular levels. Accumulated evidence of MPs' effects on the human gut suggests that large exposure to MPs and NPs may have phenotypical untoward effects in humans, calling for urgent research in this field.

Citing Articles

Microplastics: an often-overlooked issue in the transition from chronic inflammation to cancer.

Cheng Y, Yang Y, Bai L, Cui J J Transl Med. 2024; 22(1):959.

PMID: 39438955 PMC: 11494930. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05731-5.


Microplastic exposure is associated with epigenomic effects in the model organism Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow).

Wade M, Bucci K, Rochman C, Meek M J Hered. 2024; 116(2):113-125.

PMID: 38742563 PMC: 11879203. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esae027.


Toward Nano- and Microplastic Sensors: Identification of Nano- and Microplastic Particles via Artificial Intelligence Combined with a Plasmonic Probe Functionalized with an Estrogen Receptor.

Seggio M, Arcadio F, Radicchi E, Cennamo N, Zeni L, Bossi A ACS Omega. 2024; 9(17):18984-18994.

PMID: 38708270 PMC: 11064004. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c09485.


Sex-Specific Effects of Polystyrene Microplastic and Lead(II) Co-Exposure on the Gut Microbiome and Fecal Metabolome in C57BL/6 Mice.

Shen W, Zhao M, Xu W, Shi X, Ren F, Tu P Metabolites. 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38668317 PMC: 11051764. DOI: 10.3390/metabo14040189.


Unraveling the in vivo fate of inhaled micro- and nanoplastics with PET imaging.

Delaney S, Rodriguez C, Sarrett S, Dayts E, Zeglis B, Keinanen O Sci Total Environ. 2023; 904:166320.

PMID: 37586535 PMC: 10841220. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166320.


References
1.
de Jong W, Hagens W, Krystek P, Burger M, Sips A, Geertsma R . Particle size-dependent organ distribution of gold nanoparticles after intravenous administration. Biomaterials. 2008; 29(12):1912-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.037. View

2.
Huang W, Yin H, Yang Y, Jin L, Lu G, Dang Z . Influence of the co-exposure of microplastics and tetrabromobisphenol A on human gut: Simulation in vitro with human cell Caco-2 and gut microbiota. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 778:146264. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146264. View

3.
Ragusa A, Svelato A, Santacroce C, Catalano P, Notarstefano V, Carnevali O . Plasticenta: First evidence of microplastics in human placenta. Environ Int. 2021; 146:106274. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106274. View

4.
Merkley S, Moss H, Goodfellow S, Ling C, Meyer-Hagen J, Weaver J . Polystyrene microplastics induce an immunometabolic active state in macrophages. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2021; 38(1):31-41. PMC: 8606615. DOI: 10.1007/s10565-021-09616-x. View

5.
Deng Y, Zhang Y, Lemos B, Ren H . Tissue accumulation of microplastics in mice and biomarker responses suggest widespread health risks of exposure. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:46687. PMC: 5402289. DOI: 10.1038/srep46687. View