» Articles » PMID: 3490566

Implantation Techniques and Experience with Percutaneous Intramuscular Electrodes in the Lower Extremities

Overview
Date 1986 Jul 1
PMID 3490566
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Innervated paralyzed muscles have been implanted with temporary percutaneous intramuscular electrodes in order to allow selective stimulation of as many muscles as necessary to achieve a cosmetically acceptable and energy-efficient gait in paraplegic subjects. Fine wire electrodes were implanted under sterile conditions at the motor points (MP) of hip extensors, flexors, abductors and adductors; knee extensors; and ankle plantar- and dorsi-flexors. Electrodes were routed to the MP's from one of four skin sites on the legs where the wires emerged. Employed were both a direct approach from the skin site to the MP and an indirect approach which involved one or more subcutaneous passages of the electrode wire from the MP to the skin site. Muscles were stimulated approximately 12 hours per week in daily electrical exercise and gait training. Electrodes were removed when they exhibited one of two types of failure: breakage, as determined by high impedance, or loss of adequate function as a result of electrode movement. Of 1025 electrodes implanted in 6 subjects over a period of 38 months, 35 percent failed within the first 4 months; more than 75 percent of those early failures resulted from electrode movement. Complete withdrawal of those electrodes was usually possible. The probability of electrode failure decreased exponentially during the first 4 months and reached less than 4 percent per month for electrodes implanted for longer than 6 months. These procedures have allowed multiple revisions toward a more functional neuro-orthotic system.

Citing Articles

Overcoming failure: improving acceptance and success of implanted neural interfaces.

Dalrymple A, Jones S, Fallon J, Shepherd R, Weber D Bioelectron Med. 2025; 11(1):6.

PMID: 40083033 PMC: 11907899. DOI: 10.1186/s42234-025-00168-7.


A review of prospective studies regarding percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation treatment in the management of chronic pain.

Pritzlaff S, Latif U, Rosenow J, Chae J, Wilson R, Huffman W Pain Manag. 2024; 14(4):209-222.

PMID: 38939963 PMC: 11234914. DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2024.2352398.


Large-scale intramuscular electrode system for chronic electromyography and functional electrical stimulation.

Holly N, Hasse B, Gothard K, Fuglevand A J Neurophysiol. 2022; 128(4):1011-1024.

PMID: 36129191 PMC: 9550579. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00325.2022.


Neural Implants Without Electronics: A Proof-of-Concept Study on a Human Skin Model.

Kiele P, Braig D, Weis J, Baslan Y, Pasluosta C, Stieglitz T IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2022; 1:91-97.

PMID: 35402961 PMC: 8975271. DOI: 10.1109/OJEMB.2020.2981254.


Peripherally Induced Reconditioning of the Central Nervous System: A Proposed Mechanistic Theory for Sustained Relief of Chronic Pain with Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.

Deer T, Eldabe S, Falowski S, Huntoon M, Staats P, Cassar I J Pain Res. 2021; 14:721-736.

PMID: 33737830 PMC: 7966353. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S297091.