» Articles » PMID: 19236990

Implanted Electrical Stimulation of the Trunk for Seated Postural Stability and Function After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: a Single Case Study

Overview
Date 2009 Feb 25
PMID 19236990
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To explore and quantify the physical and functional effects of stabilizing the torso with electrical stimulation of the paralyzed hip and trunk musculature after motor complete tetraplegia.

Design: Single-subject case study with repeated measures and concurrent controls.

Setting: Academic outpatient rehabilitation center.

Participants: Forty-four-year-old man with C4 American Spinal Injury Association grade A tetraplegia 20 years postspinal cord injury.

Intervention: A surgically implanted multichannel pulse generator and intramuscular stimulating electrodes to activate lumbar erector spinae, quadratus lumborum, and gluteus maximus muscles bilaterally.

Main Outcome Measures: Outcomes assessed with and without stimulation included (1) spinal alignment and pelvic orientation, (2) pulmonary function and ventilatory volumes, (3) forward bimanual reaching distance, (4) seated stability and resistance to externally applied disturbances, (5) maximal force and speed of rowing-like movements, and the ability to (6) independently return to an erect seated position from full forward or lateral flexion and (7) roll in bed without assistance.

Results: Stimulation improved spinal convexity and kyphosis by 26 degrees and 21 degrees , reduced posterior pelvic tilt by 11 degrees , increased forced expiratory volume and vital capacity by 10% and 22%, and improved forward reach by more than 7cm. Average resistance to sagittal disturbances increased by more than 40% (P<.002), and mean force exerted during underhanded pulling more than doubled (P=.014) with stimulation. Restoration of upright sitting in both sagittal and coronal planes and bed turning was made possible through appropriately timed activation of the hip and trunk muscles.

Conclusions: A neuroprosthesis for controlling the paralyzed torso can positively impact spinal alignment, seated posture, pulmonary function, trunk stability, and reach. Stimulation of hip and trunk muscles can improve performance of activities of daily living as well as enable independent wheelchair and bed mobility.

Citing Articles

Stabilizing leaning postures with feedback controlled functional neuromuscular stimulation after trunk paralysis.

Friederich A, Lombardo L, Foglyano K, Audu M, Triolo R Front Rehabil Sci. 2023; 4:1222174.

PMID: 37841066 PMC: 10568131. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1222174.


Sagittal Spinal Alignment in People with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury and Normal Individual: A Comparison Study Using 3D Ultrasound Imaging.

Tharu N, Lee T, Lai K, Lau T, Chan C, Zheng Y J Clin Med. 2023; 12(11).

PMID: 37298049 PMC: 10253971. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113854.


Neuromodulation for recovery of trunk and sitting functions following spinal cord injury: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Tharu N, Wong A, Zheng Y Bioelectron Med. 2023; 9(1):11.

PMID: 37246214 PMC: 10226194. DOI: 10.1186/s42234-023-00113-6.


Effects of trunk neuromuscular electrical stimulation on the motor circuits of able-bodied individuals.

Sasaki A, Cao N, Yuasa A, Popovic M, Nakazawa K, Milosevic M Exp Brain Res. 2023; 241(4):979-990.

PMID: 36918420 PMC: 10082097. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06585-x.


Improving Upper Extremity Strength, Function, and Trunk Stability Using Wide-Pulse Functional Electrical Stimulation in Combination With Functional Task-Specific Practice.

Tefertiller C, Bartelt P, Stobelaar M, Charlifue S, Sevigny M, Vande Griend E Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2022; 28(2):139-152.

PMID: 35521056 PMC: 9009203. DOI: 10.46292/sci21-00004.


References
1.
Anderson K . Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2005; 21(10):1371-83. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371. View

2.
DAVIS Jr J, Triolo R, Uhlir J, Bhadra N, Lissy D, Nandurkar S . Surgical technique for installing an eight-channel neuroprosthesis for standing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; (385):237-52. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200104000-00035. View

3.
Marsolais E, Kobetic R . Implantation techniques and experience with percutaneous intramuscular electrodes in the lower extremities. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1986; 23(3):1-8. View

4.
Brown-Triolo D, Roach M, Nelson K, Triolo R . Consumer perspectives on mobility: implications for neuroprosthesis design. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007; 39(6):659-69. View

5.
Bogie K, Triolo R . Effects of regular use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on tissue health. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004; 40(6):469-75. DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2003.11.0469. View