» Articles » PMID: 34831648

Development of the University Food Environment Assessment (Uni-Food) Tool and Process to Benchmark the Healthiness, Equity, and Environmental Sustainability of University Food Environments

Abstract

Globally, there is increasing interest in monitoring actions to create healthy, equitable and environmentally sustainable food environments. Currently, there is a lack of detailed tools for monitoring and benchmarking university food environments. This study aimed to develop the University Food Environment Assessment (Uni-Food) tool and process to benchmark the healthiness, equity, and environmental sustainability of food environments in tertiary education settings, and pilot test its implementation in three Australian universities in 2021. The Uni-Food tool development was informed by a review of the literature and input from an expert advisory panel. It comprises three components: (1) university systems and governance, (2) campus facilities and environments, and (3) food retail outlets. The process for implementing the tool is designed for universities to self-assess the extent to which they have implemented recommended practice in 68 indicators, across 16 domains, weighted based on their relative importance. The pilot implementation of the tool identified moderate diversity in food environments across universities and highlighted several opportunities for improvements at each institution. The assessment process was found to be reliable, with assessors rating the tool as easy to use, requiring minimal resources. Broad application of the tool has the potential to increase accountability and guide best practice in tertiary education and other complex institutional settings.

Citing Articles

Perspectives on the sustainment of a healthy vending initiative in a university setting: a reflexive thematic analysis.

Dancey J, Reeve B, Jones A, Brimblecombe J J Nutr Sci. 2025; 14:e23.

PMID: 40070911 PMC: 11894401. DOI: 10.1017/jns.2025.12.


Do US-based university pouring rights contracts with beverage companies include provisions that promote environmental sustainability?.

Benjamin-Neelon S, Ruffin M, Grossman E, Lucas S, Marx K, Neelon B Prev Med Rep. 2025; 51:103001.

PMID: 40060935 PMC: 11889575. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103001.


Benchmarking the healthiness, equity and environmental sustainability of university food environments in Australia, 2021/22.

Sacks G, Chan J, Mann D, Dickie S, Gaucher-Holm A, Naughton S BMC Nutr. 2025; 11(1):38.

PMID: 39934860 PMC: 11817424. DOI: 10.1186/s40795-025-01029-x.


Changes in Availability and Affordability on the University Food Environment: The Potential Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Perez P, Jose M, da Silva I, Mazzonetto A, Canella D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 21(12.

PMID: 39767387 PMC: 11675125. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21121544.


Transforming food environments: a global lens on challenges and opportunities for achieving healthy and sustainable diets for all.

Goh E, Sobratee-Fajurally N, Allegretti A, Sardeshpande M, Mustafa M, Azam-Ali S Front Sustain Food Syst. 2024; 8:1366878.

PMID: 39655043 PMC: 7617158. DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1366878.


References
1.
Lee K, Marcinow M, Minaker L, Kirkpatrick S . The Healthfulness of Eateries at the University of Waterloo: A Comparison across 2 Time Points. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2019; 81(2):72-79. DOI: 10.3148/cjdpr-2019-031. View

2.
. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020; 396(10258):1223-1249. PMC: 7566194. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2. View

3.
Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T, Wedding D, Gwet K . A comparison of Cohen's Kappa and Gwet's AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:61. PMC: 3643869. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-61. View

4.
Grech A, Howse E, Boylan S . A scoping review of policies promoting and supporting sustainable food systems in the university setting. Nutr J. 2020; 19(1):97. PMC: 7488481. DOI: 10.1186/s12937-020-00617-w. View

5.
Robinson E, Parker C, Carey R, Sacks G . The Extent to Which Obesity and Population Nutrition Are Considered by Institutional Investors Engaged in Responsible Investment in Australia - A Review of Policies and Commitments. Front Psychol. 2021; 11:577816. PMC: 7793752. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577816. View