» Articles » PMID: 34176546

On-campus Food Environment, Purchase Behaviours, Preferences and Opinions in a Norwegian University Community

Overview
Date 2021 Jun 28
PMID 34176546
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the food environment at OsloMet, through the nutritional profile and processing level of available commercial foods and drinks, as well as to determine food-purchasing behaviours, preferences and opinions on the food environment, in order to identify whether interventions on campus need to be conducted.

Design: Cross-sectional descriptive study.

Setting: Pilestredet and Kjeller campus of OsloMet (Norway).

Participants: To analyse the nutritional profile of products offered at all food outlets (seven canteens, three coffee shops and two vending machines) at the main campuses three criteria were applied: those proposed by the Spanish Agency for Food Safety and Nutrition, the UK nutrient profiling model and those of the Food and Drink Industry Professional Practices Committee Norway. In addition, products were classified by processing level, using the NOVA system. Food purchasing, food choice behaviours and opinions were analysed through a survey online, in which 129 subjects participated.

Results: With regard to the first of the objectives, the combination of the above-mentioned criteria showed that 39·8 % of the products were 'unhealthy' and 85·9 % were 'ultra-processed'. Regarding the second objective, the most important determinants of food choice were taste, convenience, and cost and nutrition/health value. The most common improvements suggested were lowering the cost, improving the allergen information on labelling and increasing the variety of fresh and healthy foods.

Conclusions: A high proportion of the products offered were considered 'unhealthy' and highly processed. Interventions that improve food prices, availability and information on labelling would be well-received in this community.

Citing Articles

Changes in Availability and Affordability on the University Food Environment: The Potential Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Perez P, Jose M, da Silva I, Mazzonetto A, Canella D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 21(12.

PMID: 39767387 PMC: 11675125. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21121544.


Assessing the Healthfulness of University Food Environments: A Systematic Review of Methods and Tools.

Dahl A, Fandetti S, Ademu L, Harris R, Racine E Nutrients. 2024; 16(10.

PMID: 38794664 PMC: 11123862. DOI: 10.3390/nu16101426.


A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of the Food Environment at an Australian University Campus.

Coyle D, Sanavio L, Barrett E, Huang L, Law K, Nanayakkara P Nutrients. 2023; 15(7).

PMID: 37049463 PMC: 10097222. DOI: 10.3390/nu15071623.


How Does the University Food Environment Impact Student Dietary Behaviors? A Systematic Review.

Li X, Braakhuis A, Li Z, Roy R Front Nutr. 2022; 9:840818.

PMID: 35571951 PMC: 9090611. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.840818.


Development of the University Food Environment Assessment (Uni-Food) Tool and Process to Benchmark the Healthiness, Equity, and Environmental Sustainability of University Food Environments.

Mann D, Kwon J, Naughton S, Boylan S, Chan J, Charlton K Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(22).

PMID: 34831648 PMC: 8625487. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182211895.

References
1.
Roy R, Kelly B, Rangan A, Allman-Farinelli M . Food Environment Interventions to Improve the Dietary Behavior of Young Adults in Tertiary Education Settings: A Systematic Literature Review. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015; 115(10):1647-81.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.06.380. View

2.
Byrd-Bredbenner C, Johnson M, Quick V, Walsh J, Greene G, Hoerr S . Sweet and salty. An assessment of the snacks and beverages sold in vending machines on US post-secondary institution campuses. Appetite. 2012; 58(3):1143-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.02.055. View

3.
Fuentes Pacheco A, Carrillo Balam G, Archibald D, Grant E, Skafida V . Exploring the relationship between local food environments and obesity in UK, Ireland, Australia and New Zealand: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(2):e018701. PMC: 5855298. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018701. View

4.
Kelly N, Mazzeo S, Bean M . Systematic review of dietary interventions with college students: directions for future research and practice. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013; 45(4):304-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2012.10.012. View

5.
Thow A, Jan S, Leeder S, Swinburn B . The effect of fiscal policy on diet, obesity and chronic disease: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2010; 88(8):609-14. PMC: 2908970. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.09.070987. View