» Articles » PMID: 34819056

Cementation of a Dual Mobility Cup in a Well-fixed Acetabular Component- a Reliable Option in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2021 Nov 25
PMID 34819056
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The "cup-in-cup" technique allows for revision of failed total hip arthroplasty (THA) when the cementless cup is well fixed. Furthermore, it can be used for liner wear or mechanical failure where liner replacement may be impossible or impractical. Recently, the "cup-in-cup" technique in combination with dual mobility cups (DMC) has drawn increased attention. Our aim was to report on the clinical and radiographic outcomes following this surgery.

Methods: From 2015 to 2020, 33 patients treated with the DMC- "cup in cup" technique were retrospectively reviewed. Fourteen patients had died while 19 were available for the final follow-up (FU), of which 15 underwent both a radiograph and a FU visit, 2 underwent a radiograph only and 2 underwent a telephone interview only. Patient-related outcome measures included the HHS and the WOMAC. Radiographs were assessed for implant loosening and positioning. Primary endpoint was revision of any cause and secondary endpoint was loosening of the DMC at the latest FU. The survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: The mean age at surgery was 78.6 ± 7.1 (63-93) years and the mean surgery duration was 124.4 ± 52.0 (60-245) minutes. Recurrent dislocation (42.4%), periprosthetic fracture (39.4%) and polyethylene wear (6.1%) were the most frequent reasons for surgery. The mean FU duration (n = 19) was 28.5 ± 17.3 (3-64) months. The mean HHS score at FU was 59.4 ± 22.2 (29-91) and the mean WOMAC score was 59.7 ± 25.6 (15.6-93.8). Two cups were revised due to instability and one revision was performed due to periprosthetic joint infection, accounting for an overall cup survival rate of 86.8% after a mean FU of 22.9 ± 18.0 (1.5-64.6) months. The survival rate free of loosening was 90.9% after a mean FU of 22.3 ± 18.5 (1.5-64.7) months.

Conclusions: We found that the cementation of a DMC in a well-fixed cup is a promising short- to mid-term treatment addressing THA instability especially in elderly and frail patients, who benefit from a reduced operation time. Proper cementation technique, adequate cup positioning as well as selection of a sufficiently large DMC are crucial for treatment success. Longer FUs will be needed in the future in order to further prove the benefit of this technique.

Citing Articles

Removing Cemented Dual Mobility Liners From Acetabular Components: A Technical Tip for a Challenging Surgical Problem.

Wilson J, Mika A, Martin J Arthroplast Today. 2023; 23:101211.

PMID: 37781023 PMC: 10541465. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101211.


Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Ciolli G, Mesnard G, Deroche E, Gunst S, Batailler C, Servien E J Pers Med. 2023; 13(1).

PMID: 36675742 PMC: 9867154. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13010081.


Late intraprosthetic dislocation of a monoblock dual-mobility cup cemented into a well-fixed cementless acetabular shell. A case report.

Ulgelmo M, Sandri A, Regis D, Casablanca E, Toso G, Valentini R Acta Biomed. 2022; 93(S1):e2022206.

PMID: 36129744 PMC: 10510970. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v93iS1.12553.

References
1.
Wegrzyn J, Thoreson A, Guyen O, Lewallen D, An K . Cementation of a dual-mobility acetabular component into a well-fixed metal shell during revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical validation. J Orthop Res. 2013; 31(6):991-7. DOI: 10.1002/jor.22314. View

2.
Brown T, Tibbo M, Arsoy D, Lewallen D, Hanssen A, Trousdale R . Long-Term Outcomes of Constrained Liners Cemented into Retained, Well-Fixed Acetabular Components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019; 101(7):620-627. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00607. View

3.
Chalmers B, Ledford C, Taunton M, Sierra R, Lewallen D, Trousdale R . Cementation of a Dual Mobility Construct in Recurrently Dislocating and High Risk Patients Undergoing Revision Total Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017; 33(5):1501-1506. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.055. View

4.
Bellamy N, BUCHANAN W, Goldsmith C, Campbell J, Stitt L . Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988; 15(12):1833-40. View

5.
Gibbs V, McCulloch R, Dhiman P, McGill A, Taylor A, Palmer A . Modifiable risk factors for mortality in revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic fracture. Bone Joint J. 2020; 102-B(5):580-585. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B5.BJJ-2019-1673.R1. View