Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics: A Scoping Review

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2021 Nov 23

PMID 34813611

Citations 16

Authors

Simon J Federer

Gareth G Jones

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the application of artificial intelligence (AI) to orthopaedic surgery. This review aims to identify and characterise research in this field, in order to understand the extent, range and nature of this work, and act as springboard to stimulate future studies. A scoping review, a form of structured evidence synthesis, was conducted to summarise the use of AI in orthopaedics. A literature search (1946-2019) identified 222 studies eligible for inclusion. These studies were predominantly small and retrospective. There has been significant growth in the number of papers published in the last three years, mainly from the USA (37%). The majority of research used AI for image interpretation (45%) or as a clinical decision tool (25%). Spine (43%), knee (23%) and hip (14%) were the regions of the body most commonly studied. The application of artificial intelligence to orthopaedics is growing. However, the scope of its use so far remains limited, both in terms of its possible clinical applications, and the sub-specialty areas of the body which have been studied. A standardized method of reporting AI studies would allow direct assessment and comparison. Prospective studies are required to validate AI tools for clinical use.

Citing Articles

Digital Age and Medicine: Visualization and Evaluation of Foot Anatomy with Artificial Intelligence.

Basgun F, Altunbey T, Ay S, Soylemez D, Emre E, Basgun N Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40075798 PMC: 11898475. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15050550.

Exploring artificial intelligence in orthopaedics: A collaborative survey from the ISAKOS Young Professional Task Force.

Familiari F, Saithna A, Martinez-Cano J, Chahla J, Castillo J, DePhillipo N J Exp Orthop. 2025; 12(1):e70181.

PMID: 39996084 PMC: 11848192. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70181.

HKA-Net: clinically-adapted deep learning for automated measurement of hip-knee-ankle angle on lower limb radiography for knee osteoarthritis assessment.

Kim Y, Han B, Kim J, Sa J, Hong J, Son Y J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):777.

PMID: 39568048 PMC: 11580353. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05265-y.

Deep learning models for tendinopathy detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests.

Droppelmann G, Rodriguez C, Smague D, Jorquera C, Feijoo F EFORT Open Rev. 2024; 9(10):941-952.

PMID: 39360789 PMC: 11457807. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-24-0016.

Artifical intelligence in surgery: ethical considerations in the light of social trends in the perception of health and medicine.

Fangerau H EFORT Open Rev. 2024; 9(5):323-328.

PMID: 38726973 PMC: 11099585. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-24-0029.

References

Cabitza F, Locoro A, Banfi G . Machine Learning in Orthopedics: A Literature Review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018; 6:75. PMC: 6030383. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00075. View

Ogink P, Karhade A, Thio Q, Gormley W, Oner F, Verlaan J . Predicting discharge placement after elective surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis using machine learning methods. Eur Spine J. 2019; 28(6):1433-1440. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-05928-z. View

Oktay A, Albayrak N, Akgul Y . Computer aided diagnosis of degenerative intervertebral disc diseases from lumbar MR images. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2014; 38(7):613-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.04.006. View

Haeberle H, Helm J, Navarro S, Karnuta J, Schaffer J, Callaghan J . Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Lower Extremity Arthroplasty: A Review. J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34(10):2201-2203. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.055. View

Mathew B, Norris D, MACKINTOSH I, Waddell G . Artificial intelligence in the prediction of operative findings in low back surgery. Br J Neurosurg. 1989; 3(2):161-70. DOI: 10.3109/02688698909002791. View

Hyer J, Ejaz A, Tsilimigras D, Paredes A, Mehta R, Pawlik T . Novel Machine Learning Approach to Identify Preoperative Risk Factors Associated With Super-Utilization of Medicare Expenditure Following Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2019; 154(11):1014-1021. PMC: 6694398. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2979. View

Huber F, Stutz S, Vittoria de Martini I, Mannil M, Becker A, Winklhofer S . Qualitative versus quantitative lumbar spinal stenosis grading by machine learning supported texture analysis-Experience from the LSOS study cohort. Eur J Radiol. 2019; 114:45-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.023. View

Jaremko J, Poncet P, Ronsky J, Harder J, Dansereau J, Labelle H . Estimation of spinal deformity in scoliosis from torso surface cross sections. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(14):1583-91. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200107150-00017. View

Tricco A, Lillie E, Zarin W, OBrien K, Colquhoun H, Levac D . PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169(7):467-473. DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850. View

10.

DLima D, Patil S, Steklov N, Colwell Jr C . The 2011 ABJS Nicolas Andry Award: 'Lab'-in-a-knee: in vivo knee forces, kinematics, and contact analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(10):2953-70. PMC: 3171531. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1916-9. View

11.

He J, Baxter S, Xu J, Xu J, Zhou X, Zhang K . The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nat Med. 2019; 25(1):30-36. PMC: 6995276. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0. View

12.

Zhang J, Li H, Lv L, Zhang Y . Computer-Aided Cobb Measurement Based on Automatic Detection of Vertebral Slopes Using Deep Neural Network. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2017; 2017:9083916. PMC: 5651147. DOI: 10.1155/2017/9083916. View

13.

Panchmatia J, Visenio M, Panch T . The role of artificial intelligence in orthopaedic surgery. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2018; 79(12):676-681. DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2018.79.12.676. View

14.

Karnuta J, Navarro S, Haeberle H, Helm J, Kamath A, Schaffer J . Predicting Inpatient Payments Prior to Lower Extremity Arthroplasty Using Deep Learning: Which Model Architecture Is Best?. J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34(10):2235-2241.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.048. View

15.

Ramirez L, Durdle N, Raso V, Hill D . A support vector machines classifier to assess the severity of idiopathic scoliosis from surface topography. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2006; 10(1):84-91. DOI: 10.1109/titb.2005.855526. View

16.

Han S, Azad T, Suarez P, Ratliff J . A machine learning approach for predictive models of adverse events following spine surgery. Spine J. 2019; 19(11):1772-1781. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.06.018. View

17.

Karhade A, Schwab J, Bedair H . Development of Machine Learning Algorithms for Prediction of Sustained Postoperative Opioid Prescriptions After Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34(10):2272-2277.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.013. View

18.

Huber M, Kurz C, Leidl R . Predicting patient-reported outcomes following hip and knee replacement surgery using supervised machine learning. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019; 19(1):3. PMC: 6325823. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-018-0731-6. View

19.

Ramkumar P, Karnuta J, Navarro S, Haeberle H, Scuderi G, Mont M . Deep Learning Preoperatively Predicts Value Metrics for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Development and Validation of an Artificial Neural Network Model. J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34(10):2220-2227.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.034. View

20.

Couteaux V, Si-Mohamed S, Nempont O, Lefevre T, Popoff A, Pizaine G . Automatic knee meniscus tear detection and orientation classification with Mask-RCNN. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019; 100(4):235-242. DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.03.002. View