» Articles » PMID: 34811383

The New SUMPOT to Predict Postoperative Complications Using an Artificial Neural Network

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Nov 23
PMID 34811383
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An accurate assessment of preoperative risk may improve use of hospital resources and reduce morbidity and mortality in high-risk surgical patients. This study aims at implementing an automated surgical risk calculator based on Artificial Neural Network technology to identify patients at risk for postoperative complications. We developed the new SUMPOT based on risk factors previously used in other scoring systems and tested it in a cohort of 560 surgical patients undergoing elective or emergency procedures and subsequently admitted to intensive care units, high-dependency units or standard wards. The whole dataset was divided into a training set, to train the predictive model, and a testing set, to assess generalization performance. The effectiveness of the Artificial Neural Network is a measure of the accuracy in detecting those patients who will develop postoperative complications. A total of 560 surgical patients entered the analysis. Among them, 77 patients (13.7%) suffered from one or more postoperative complications (PoCs), while 483 patients (86.3%) did not. The trained Artificial Neural Network returned an average classification accuracy of 90% in the testing set. Specifically, classification accuracy was 90.2% in the control group (46 patients out of 51 were correctly classified) and 88.9% in the PoC group (8 patients out of 9 were correctly classified). The Artificial Neural Network showed good performance in predicting presence/absence of postoperative complications, suggesting its potential value for perioperative management of surgical patients. Further clinical studies are required to confirm its applicability in routine clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Application of Machine Learning in Predicting Perioperative Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: A Narrative Review for Clinicians.

Brydges G, Uppal A, Gottumukkala V Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(5):2727-2747.

PMID: 38785488 PMC: 11120613. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31050207.


Classification of tumor types using XGBoost machine learning model: a vector space transformation of genomic alterations.

Zelli V, Manno A, Compagnoni C, Ibraheem R, Zazzeroni F, Alesse E J Transl Med. 2023; 21(1):836.

PMID: 37990214 PMC: 10664515. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04720-4.


Prediction of Complications and Prognostication in Perioperative Medicine: A Systematic Review and PROBAST Assessment of Machine Learning Tools.

Arina P, Kaczorek M, Hofmaenner D, Pisciotta W, Refinetti P, Singer M Anesthesiology. 2023; 140(1):85-101.

PMID: 37944114 PMC: 11146190. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004764.

References
1.
Kamachi K, Ozawa S, Hayashi T, Kazuno A, Ito E, Makuuchi H . Impact of body mass index on postoperative complications and long-term survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2015; 29(3):229-35. DOI: 10.1111/dote.12327. View

2.
Gao L, Zhang L, Liu C, Wu S . Handling imbalanced medical image data: A deep-learning-based one-class classification approach. Artif Intell Med. 2020; 108:101935. PMC: 7519174. DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101935. View

3.
Sun Y, Peng Y, Chen Y, Shukla A . Application of artificial neural networks in the design of controlled release drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003; 55(9):1201-15. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-409x(03)00119-4. View

4.
Copeland G, Jones D, Walters M . POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg. 1991; 78(3):355-60. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800780327. View

5.
Zhang G, Berardi V . An investigation of neural networks in thyroid function diagnosis. Health Care Manag Sci. 2000; 1(1):29-37. DOI: 10.1023/a:1019078131698. View