» Articles » PMID: 34708718

Magnetic-activated Cell Sorting of Nonapoptotic Spermatozoa with a High DNA Fragmentation Index Improves the Live Birth Rate and Decreases Transfer Cycles of IVF/ICSI

Overview
Journal Asian J Androl
Specialty Urology
Date 2021 Oct 28
PMID 34708718
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) in sperm preparation for male subjects with a sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) ≥30%. A total of 86 patients who had undergone their first long-term long protocol were selected. The protocol involved in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, and the patients were divided into the MACS or control groups. The MACS group included sperm samples analyzed with MACS that were combined with density gradient centrifugation (DGC) and the swim-up (SU) technique (n = 39), and the control group included sperm samples prepared using standard techniques (DGC and SU; n = 41). No differences were noted with regard to basic clinical characteristics, number of oocytes retrieved, normal fertilization rate, cleavage rate, or transplantable embryo rate between the two groups in IVF/ICSI. In addition, the clinical pregnancy and implantation rates of the first embryo transfer cycles indicated no significant differences between the two groups. However, there was a tendency to improve the live birth rate (LBR) of the first embryo transfer cycle (63.2% vs 53.9%) and the cumulative LBR (79.5% vs 70.7%) in the MACS group compared with the control group. Moreover, the number of transferred embryos (mean ± standard deviation [s.d.]: 1.7 ± 0.7 vs 2.3 ± 1.6) and the transfer number of each retrieved cycle (mean ± s.d.: 1.2 ± 0.5 vs 1.6 ± 0.8) were significantly lower in the MACS group than those in the control group. Thus, the selection of nonapoptotic spermatozoa by MACS for higher sperm DFI could improve assisted reproductive clinical outcomes.

Citing Articles

A Narrative Review on the Sperm Selection Methods in Assisted Reproductive Technology: Out with the New, the Old Is Better?.

Tiptiri-Kourpeti A, Asimakopoulos B, Nikolettos N J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004597 PMC: 11856075. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041066.


Emerging trends in sperm selection: enhancing success rates in assisted reproduction.

Zhang X, Chao S, Ye N, Ouyang D Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024; 22(1):67.

PMID: 38877490 PMC: 11177495. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01239-1.


In cases with raised sperm DNA fragmentation, can sperm selection by magnetic-activated cell sorting or testicular sperm aspiration help improve reproductive outcomes?.

Mantravadi K, Rao D J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(6):1507-1515.

PMID: 38700621 PMC: 11224189. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03128-3.


An Alternative Application of Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting: CD45 and CD235a Based Purification of Semen and Testicular Tissue Samples.

Czetany P, Ballo A, Mark L, Torok A, Szanto A, Mate G Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(7).

PMID: 38612438 PMC: 11011735. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25073627.


Management of Primary Infertility: A Comprehensive Approach With Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting in an Asthenozoospermic Patient.

Tyagi P, More A, Chaudhary N, Khemani S, Dagwar P Cureus. 2024; 16(1):e53148.

PMID: 38420052 PMC: 10900275. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53148.


References
1.
Wright C, Milne S, Leeson H . Sperm DNA damage caused by oxidative stress: modifiable clinical, lifestyle and nutritional factors in male infertility. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014; 28(6):684-703. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.02.004. View

2.
Romany L, Garrido N, Motato Y, Aparicio B, Remohi J, Meseguer M . Removal of annexin V-positive sperm cells for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in ovum donation cycles does not improve reproductive outcome: a controlled and randomized trial in unselected males. Fertil Steril. 2014; 102(6):1567-75.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.001. View

3.
Fleming S, Ilad R, Griffin A, Wu Y, Ong K, Smith H . Prospective controlled trial of an electrophoretic method of sperm preparation for assisted reproduction: comparison with density gradient centrifugation. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23(12):2646-51. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den330. View

4.
Herrero M, Delbes G, Chung J, Son W, Holzer H, Buckett W . Case report: the use of annexin V coupled with magnetic activated cell sorting in cryopreserved spermatozoa from a male cancer survivor: healthy twin newborns after two previous ICSI failures. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013; 30(11):1415-9. PMC: 3879941. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-013-0086-y. View

5.
Gardner D, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft W . Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000; 73(6):1155-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00518-5. View