» Articles » PMID: 20643402

Effect of Sperm DNA Fragmentation on Pregnancy Outcome Depends on Oocyte Quality

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2010 Jul 21
PMID 20643402
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To quantify the effect of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) on reproductive outcome by evaluating the most statistically significant bias factors using logistic regression.

Design: Prospective blind observational cohort study.

Setting: University affiliated private IVF unit.

Patient(s): Two hundred ten male partners of couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) or first intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles with fresh or thawed sperm with the women's own or donated oocytes.

Intervention(s): None.

Main Outcome Measure(s): SDF determined before and after swim-up (n=420), odds ratio calculated of the effect of an increase of one unit of SDF on pregnancy, and stratified regression analysis performed to evaluate the confusion effect of oocyte quality, sperm origin, and the fertilization procedure.

Result(s): The effect of SDF on pregnancy was not affected by sperm origin (fresh or thawed) or fertilization procedure when measured both before and after swim-up. When oocytes from infertile patients were employed, SDF had a statistically significant negative impact on chance of pregnancy. For every 10% increase in SDF, the probability of not achieving pregnancy increased by 1.31. When donated oocytes were employed, SDF did not have a statistically significant effect.

Conclusion(s): The effect of SDF on the probability of pregnancy can be calculated independent of the fertilization procedure or sperm origin. Oocyte quality conditions the extent of the negative impact of SDF on pregnancy; this can be overcome when good quality oocytes are employed.

Citing Articles

Superior Live Birth Rates, Reducing Sperm DNA Fragmentation (SDF), and Lowering Miscarriage Rates by Using Testicular Sperm Versus Ejaculates in Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Cycles from Couples with High SDF: A Systematic Review and....

Cano-Extremera M, Hervas I, Gisbert Iranzo A, Falquet Guillem M, Gil Julia M, Navarro-Gomezlechon A Biology (Basel). 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 40001898 PMC: 11851878. DOI: 10.3390/biology14020130.


Effects of sperm DNA fragmentation on embryo morphokinetic parameters and laboratory outcomes in women of different ages during intracytoplasmic sperm treatment cycles.

Ye D, Ye Z, Zhang H Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025; .

PMID: 39955692 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-025-07949-0.


The Assessment of Sperm DNA Integrity: Implications for Assisted Reproductive Technology Fertility Outcomes across Livestock Species.

Robertson M, Chambers C, Spanner E, de Graaf S, Rickard J Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 39056730 PMC: 11273975. DOI: 10.3390/biology13070539.


Expression of DDSR1 Long Non-Coding RNA and Genes Involved in the DNA Damage Response in Sperm with DNA Fragmentation.

Moayeri M, Irani S, Novin M, Salahshourifar I, Salehi M Reprod Sci. 2024; 31(10):3112-3121.

PMID: 39014289 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-024-01640-6.


Can Microfluidics Improve Sperm Quality? A Prospective Functional Study.

Meseguer F, Gimenez Rodriguez C, Rivera Egea R, Carrion Sisternas L, Remohi J, Meseguer M Biomedicines. 2024; 12(5).

PMID: 38791093 PMC: 11118748. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12051131.