» Articles » PMID: 34706070

Can MiRNAs Be Useful Biomarkers in Improving Prognostic Stratification in Endometrial Cancer Patients? An Update Review

Overview
Journal Int J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Oct 27
PMID 34706070
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological cancer, with annual incidence rates in Western countries ranging between 15 and 25 per 100 000 women. About 15% to 20% of patients with EC have high-risk disease and follow an aggressive clinical course. Unfortunately, the assessment of histologic parameters is poorly reproducible and conventional clinicopathological and molecular features do not reliably predict either the patient's response to the available treatments or the definition of personalized therapeutic approaches. In this context, the identification of novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, which can be integrated in the current classification schemes, represents an unmet clinical need and an important challenge. miRNAs are key players in cancer by regulating the expression of specific target genes. Their role in EC, in association with clinical and prognostic tumor biomarkers, has been investigated but, so far, with little consensus among the studies. The present review aims to describe the recent advances in miRNAs research in EC taking into consideration the current classification schemes and to highlight the most promising miRNAs. Finally, a perspective point of view sheds light on the challenges ahead in the landscape of EC.

Citing Articles

[Predictive Value of A miRNA Signature for Distant Metastasis in Lung Cancer].

Cong J, Wang A, Wang Y, Li X, Pi J, Liu K Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2025; 27(12):919-930.

PMID: 39962847 PMC: 11839496. DOI: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.102.43.


Utilization of miRNAs as Biomarkers for the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Metastasis in Gynecological Malignancies.

Lazaridis A, Katifelis H, Kalampokas E, Lambropoulou D, Aravantinos G, Gazouli M Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(21).

PMID: 39519256 PMC: 11546551. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252111703.


Semiconducting polymer dots for multifunctional integrated nanomedicine carriers.

Zhang Z, Yu C, Wu Y, Wang Z, Xu H, Yan Y Mater Today Bio. 2024; 26:101028.

PMID: 38590985 PMC: 11000120. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101028.


miRNA levels are associated with body mass index in endometrial cancer and may have implications for therapy.

Ravegnini G, Gorini F, Coada C, De Leo A, de Biase D, Di Costanzo S Cancer Sci. 2024; 115(3):883-893.

PMID: 38196275 PMC: 10920998. DOI: 10.1111/cas.15977.


Investigating novel biomarkers in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma: in silico analysis and clinical specimens validation via RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry.

Li J, Ramzan F, Zhong G Am J Cancer Res. 2023; 13(9):4376-4400.

PMID: 37818076 PMC: 10560950.


References
1.
Morice P, Leary A, Creutzberg C, Abu-Rustum N, Darai E . Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2015; 387(10023):1094-1108. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00130-0. View

2.
Keys H, Roberts J, Brunetto V, Zaino R, Spirtos N, Bloss J . A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2004; 92(3):744-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.11.048. View

3.
Rizner T . Discovery of biomarkers for endometrial cancer: current status and prospects. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2016; 16(12):1315-1336. DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2016.1258302. View

4.
Stelloo E, Nout R, Osse E, Jurgenliemk-Schulz I, Jobsen J, Lutgens L . Improved Risk Assessment by Integrating Molecular and Clinicopathological Factors in Early-stage Endometrial Cancer-Combined Analysis of the PORTEC Cohorts. Clin Cancer Res. 2016; 22(16):4215-24. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2878. View

5.
Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza M, Marnitz S . ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021; 31(1):12-39. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230. View