Long-Term Clinical Study of Implants Placed in Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate

Overview

Journal Int J Environ Res Public Health

Publisher MDPI

Specialties Environmental Health
Public Health

Date 2021 Oct 13

PMID 34639277

Citations 6

Authors

Eugenio Velasco-Ortega

Angela Sierra-Baztan

Alvaro Jimenez-Guerra

Antonio Espana-Lopez

Ivan Ortiz-Garcia

Enrique Nunez-Marquez

Jesus Moreno-Munoz

Jose Luis Rondon-Romero

Jose Lopez-Lopez

Loreto Monsalve-Guil

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to show the long-term clinical outcomes of implants placed in maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MFSA) using beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP).

Patients And Methods: Maxillary patients were diagnosed for MFSA and used beta- β-TCP. After the lateral sinus surgery, implants were loaded at 6 months with restorations. The clinical follow-up was at 10 years.

Results: One hundred and one patients (58 females and 43 males) were treated with MFSA. Twenty-nine patients (28.7%) had a history of periodontitis. Thirty-three patients (32.7%) were smokers. One hundred and twenty-one MFSA, 81 unilateral and 20 bilateral sites, with 234 implants were performed. The average vertical bone height available was 4.92 ± 1.83 mm. The average vertical bone gain obtained was 6.95 ± 2.19 mm following MFSA. The implant cumulative survival rate was 97.2%. Three implants (1.3%) were lost during the healing period. Six implants (2.6%) were lost by peri-implantitis. One hundred and fifteen restorations were placed in the patients. Mean marginal bone loss was 1.93 mm ± 1.03 mm. Six patients (27.3%) showed technical complications. Thirty-six implants (15.3%) in 14 patients (13.9%) were associated with peri-implantitis.

Conclusions: This study indicates that treatment with implant-supported restoration by MFSA using β-TCP constitutes a successful implant approach.

Citing Articles

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Transalveolar Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation with Rotatory Instruments: An 8-Year Follow-Up Prospective Clinical Study.

Jimenez-Guerra A, Velasco-Ortega E, Matos-Garrido N, Ortiz-Garcia I, Moreno-Munoz J, Nunez-Marquez E J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39860370 PMC: 11765687. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020365.

Long-Term Clinical Study on Sandblasted-Acid-Etched Surface Dental Implants: 12-Year Follow-Up.

Velasco-Ortega E, Pato-Mourelo J, Lopez-Lopez B, Monsalve-Guil L, Moreno-Munoz J, Lopez-Lopez J Materials (Basel). 2025; 18(1.

PMID: 39795828 PMC: 11722049. DOI: 10.3390/ma18010183.

Influence of Schneiderian Membrane Perforation on Implant Survival Rate: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Schiavo-Di Flaviano V, Egido-Moreno S, Gonzalez-Navarro B, Velasco-Ortega E, Lopez-Lopez J, Monsalve-Guil L J Clin Med. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999315 PMC: 11242322. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133751.

Radiographic Study of Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation Using Osseodensification Technique with Graft Material: A Pilot Study.

Sulyhan-Sulyhan K, Barbera-Millan J, Larrazabal-Moron C, Espinosa-Gimenez J, Gomez-Adrian M Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(5).

PMID: 38786485 PMC: 11118885. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9050276.

Addition of recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 to the graft materials improves the clinical outcomes of implants placed in grafted maxillary sinus.

Lee J, Seo H, Cho Y, Sung I, Son J J Dent Sci. 2024; 19(2):865-870.

PMID: 38618057 PMC: 11010705. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.08.020.

References

Romero-Millan J, Martorell-Calatayud L, Penarrocha M, Garcia-Mira B . Indirect osteotome maxillary sinus floor elevation: an update. J Oral Implantol. 2013; 38(6):799-804. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00160. View

Wu J, Jiang J, Xu L, Liang C, Bai Y, Zou W . A pilot clinical study of Class III surgical patients facilitated by improved accelerated osteogenic orthodontic treatments. Angle Orthod. 2014; 85(4):616-24. PMC: 8611740. DOI: 10.2319/032414-220.1. View

Al-Dajani M . Recent Trends in Sinus Lift Surgery and Their Clinical Implications. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014; 18(1):204-12. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12275. View

Brum I, Frigo L, Dos Santos P, Elias C, da Fonseca G, de Carvalho J . Performance of Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate and Xenogenic Hydroxyapatite on Bone Regeneration in Rat Calvarial Defects: Histomorphometric, Immunohistochemical and Ultrastructural Analysis. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021; 16:3473-3485. PMC: 8140889. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S301470. View

Rengo C, Fiorino A, Cucchi A, Nappo A, Randellini E, Calamai P . Patient-reported outcomes and complication rates after lateral maxillary sinus floor elevation: a prospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25(7):4431-4444. PMC: 8310489. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03755-x. View

Maximiano Millan A, Bravo Alvarez R, Plana Montori M, Guerrero Gonzalez M, Saura Garcia-Martin D, Rios-Carrasco B . Assessment of the Simultaneous Use of Biomaterials in Transalveolar Sinus Floor Elevation: Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial in Humans. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(6). PMC: 7143782. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17061888. View

Szabo G, Huys L, Coulthard P, Maiorana C, Garagiola U, Barabas J . A prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial of autogenous bone versus beta-tricalcium phosphate graft alone for bilateral sinus elevation: histologic and histomorphometric evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20(3):371-81. View

Velasco-Ortega E, Valente N, Iezzi G, Petrini M, Derchi G, Barone A . Maxillary sinus augmentation with three different biomaterials: Histological, histomorphometric, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes from a randomized controlled trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020; 23(1):86-95. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12964. View

Alayan J, Ivanovski S . A prospective controlled trial comparing xenograft/autogenous bone and collagen-stabilized xenograft for maxillary sinus augmentation-Complications, patient-reported outcomes and volumetric analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 29(2):248-262. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13107. View

10.

Beretta M, Poli P, Grossi G, Pieroni S, Maiorana C . Long-term survival rate of implants placed in conjunction with 246 sinus floor elevation procedures: results of a 15-year retrospective study. J Dent. 2014; 43(1):78-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.08.006. View

11.

Eliaz N, Metoki N . Calcium Phosphate Bioceramics: A Review of Their History, Structure, Properties, Coating Technologies and Biomedical Applications. Materials (Basel). 2017; 10(4). PMC: 5506916. DOI: 10.3390/ma10040334. View

12.

Al-Moraissi E, Alkhutari A, Abotaleb B, Altairi N, Fabbro M . Do osteoconductive bone substitutes result in similar bone regeneration for maxillary sinus augmentation when compared to osteogenic and osteoinductive bone grafts? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 49(1):107-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.05.004. View

13.

Okada T, Kanai T, Tachikawa N, Munakata M, Kasugai S . Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Implant Dent. 2016; 2(1):8. PMC: 5005607. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-016-0042-6. View

14.

Danesh-Sani S, Loomer P, Wallace S . A comprehensive clinical review of maxillary sinus floor elevation: anatomy, techniques, biomaterials and complications. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 54(7):724-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.05.008. View

15.

Choy C, Lee W, Lin P, Wu Y, Huang H, Teng N . Surface Modified β-Tricalcium phosphate enhanced stem cell osteogenic differentiation in vitro and bone regeneration in vivo. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):9234. PMC: 8084957. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88402-5. View

16.

Starch-Jensen T, Aludden H, Hallman M, Dahlin C, Christensen A, Mordenfeld A . A systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term studies (five or more years) assessing maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 47(1):103-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.001. View

17.

Zijderveld S, Schulten E, Aartman I, Ten Bruggenkate C . Long-term changes in graft height after maxillary sinus floor elevation with different grafting materials: radiographic evaluation with a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20(7):691-700. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01697.x. View

18.

Farina R, Franceschetti G, Travaglini D, Consolo U, Minenna L, Schincaglia G . Radiographic outcomes of transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation: One-year results of a bi-center, parallel-arm randomized trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019; 30(9):910-919. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13497. View

19.

Yin L, Yu Z, Chen Z, Huang B, Zhang K, Zhou A . Analysis of Bone Height Changes after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Simultaneous and Delayed Placement of Dental Implants: A Clinical and Radiographic Study. J Prosthodont. 2015; 25(6):440-5. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12317. View

20.

Tan W, Lang N, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson B . A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Part II: transalveolar technique. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35(8 Suppl):241-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01273.x. View